Report: Welker won't be franchised - Page 15 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree72Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2013, 12:30 PM   #141
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,622
Default Re: Report: Welker won't be franchised

Quote:
Originally Posted by signbabybrady View Post
The good thing lies in the fact that what I was pointing out was a bare minimum that should not be to hard to outdo.
So making up that you think we will replace half of the production with no basis is reason to celebrate? The other half is what makes the offense good.
AndyJohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-19-2013, 12:32 PM   #142
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,622
Default Re: Report: Welker won't be franchised

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax View Post
If you sent WW targets elsewhere based on catch to target, yards per catch and TD to catch ration this is what you would get for production from what we have on our roster.


Player
Catches
Yards
TD
Edelman
115
1286
16
Lloyd
99
1218
5
Gronkowski
121
1744
24
Hernandez
106
1004
10
What? You think Edelman is going to catch 115 passes?
What were you drinkiing when you thought this one up?
BrickPat likes this.
AndyJohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 12:42 PM   #143
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,718
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Report: Welker won't be franchised

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax View Post
I'm not suggesting a JAG I'm just pointing out WW receives a ton of opportunities and the major question should be if another player could do as well or even better with those opportunities.

My only concern is replacing 1354 yards and 6 touchdowns how many catches or first downs are made to get it.

Name the player they can get who is going to replace it? After suggesting that Edelman is going to catch 100 balls i"m really tempted just to put you on ignore but i will wait and see who you come up with first.
BrickPat likes this.
Ivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 12:44 PM   #144
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
Default Re: Report: Welker won't be franchised

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax View Post
Why is it different? The NFL is about yards and points..
Because, other than the short yardage specialist, all "running" running backs are trying to accomplish the same thing: maximize yards per carry, minimize turnovers, move the chains.

Wide receivers, on the other hand, come with several different specialties and goals. The two most often discussed are "possession receiver" and "deep threat" but, as BB stated, "slot receiver" is a speciality of its own and is almost a completely different position. What you're basically arguing for is a YPC approach to rankings and compensation, for all receivers.

Wisely, teams don't follow that advice.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 12:45 PM   #145
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,718
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Report: Welker won't be franchised

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax View Post
Yes well of course he had more first downs it took him more downs to get places than Jackson.
Vincent Jackson plays a different role than Welker does, and while i agree they need a deep threat that in no way means they should throw away the most productive receiver in football for the past 5 years. The answer is to re-sign Welker and add a deep threat or 2 in the draft and free agency. The Patriots get worse if the let Welker walk, period, there is no way to be as good without him.
Ivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 12:50 PM   #146
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,718
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Report: Welker won't be franchised

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax View Post
Why is it different? The NFL is about yards and points..

No kidding? And with Welker the Patriots have had 2 of the 3 most productive offenses in NFL history. And since he came to NE they have had the most productive offense in NFL history over that span. Take the 5 seasons Brady has played with him and find any team that has scored more points over a 5 year span? It can't be done.
Ivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 12:53 PM   #147
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,371
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Report: Welker won't be franchised

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax View Post
They don't? When is the last time you saw a possession slot receiver go in the top rounds of the draft? No team is out there using their valuable resources to find the next Wes Welker.

It's about yards and points. Moving the chains doesn't win championships
It won 3 for the Patriots

Before you started following football?
SteveKiner and fnordcircle like this.
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
PatsWickedPissah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 12:55 PM   #148
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,718
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Report: Welker won't be franchised

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax View Post
It's about yards and points. Moving the chains doesn't win championships

So name the team that has put up more yards and points than the Patriots have with Welker?


C'mon now, you are the one who set the criteria, let's see you come up with the answer.
Ivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 12:57 PM   #149
Banned
 

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 50
Default Re: Report: Welker won't be franchised

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan View Post
No kidding? And with Welker the Patriots have had 2 of the 3 most productive offenses in NFL history. And since he came to NE they have had the most productive offense in NFL history over that span. Take the 5 seasons Brady has played with him and find any team that has scored more points over a 5 year span? It can't be done.
Too bad none of that has carried over to the playoffs with Welker in the playoffs. Time for Brady to suck it up and get on without his best friend, vacation buddy Wes the 'BM' Welker.

I mean seriously, Brady already has enough weapons on offense to win. Gronkowski, Hernandez, Ridley, Vereen, and one of the league's better offensive lines.

Time to say, "cya" to the overrated and limited Welker and shore up the defense so we actually have a chance in the playoffs when the offense stutters with all their millions locked up in a QB, 2 TEs, G, etc..

Welker has had enough chances to help this team to win a superbowl. As an, "elite" receiver as everyone claims, he hasn't been able to do it. Choked up twice, time to move on.
Helmet2Helmet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 12:59 PM   #150
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
Default Re: Report: Welker won't be franchised

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax View Post
They don't? When is the last time you saw a possession slot receiver go in the top rounds of the draft?
Well, now, it depends on just how "possession" you want to get, and you choose to ignore that the Welker-style slot WR as a major weapon is mostly a new development to the game.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax View Post
No team is out there using their valuable resources to find the next Wes Welker.
EVERY team is out there using valuable resources to find the next Wes Welker, including the New England Patriots.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax View Post
It's about yards and points. Moving the chains doesn't win championships
So you're home on spring vacation: High school or middle school? Given NE Patriots history and the likelihood that your mother wouldn't let you post this way if you were still in elementary school, that's the only thing that makes any sense.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mankins 'Definitely' to Be Franchised PatsFans.com Article PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 29 02-14-2011 02:03 PM
Ray Ventrone to be Franchised. IcyPatriot Visiting Locker Room 1 01-11-2009 07:59 AM
Thomas NOT franchised Digger44 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 23 02-22-2007 10:59 AM
Thomas FRANCHISED Remix 6 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 56 02-22-2007 09:24 AM
Do you think we should have franchised Adam now?? Sean Pa Patriot PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 14 03-22-2006 12:24 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563