Think We Need A Better D? Maybe Not... - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree19Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-05-2013, 01:48 PM   #1
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
Brady'sButtBoy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,651
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Think We Need A Better D? Maybe Not...

Check this from ESPN's TMQ column -

"• The Ravens were awful on defense, yet won the Super Bowl. Not only did Baltimore allow the San Francisco 49ers 468 yards of offense, it was the most allowed by a Super Bowl victor: the 2009 Saints have now dropped to second, winning while allowing 432 yards. Through the postseason, the Ravens allowed an average of 428 yards per game. That's awful! It's so awful, 428 yards per game would have made Baltimore the second-worst defense in the league during the regular season. Before this postseason, no team had ever given up 375 yards or more in three consecutive playoff wins. Baltimore did this in four consecutive playoff wins. The Ravens' defense was awful!But offense rules this decade. In the postseason, Baltimore averaged 31 points and 410 offensive yards. And when everything was on the line, Baltimore's defense saved the best for last."


It was Baltimore's big play ability on offense that made the difference for them, not hard hitting Pollard, Lewis, Reed, etc. The Raven's D managed one big stop, at the very end of the game, and that was much more about how they played it -blitzing like crazy at exactly the right time - not very much about the talent on their defense.


Many notable facts in column including this one - 6 of last 8 SB winners didn't have a bye.


So forget about franchising Talib, Bill, please find Brady some stud WRs like Boldin and Smith. The two SB's and this year's AFC championship were lost because the offense didn't score enough, not because the D didn't come through. 14, 17, and 13 points just won't get you anywhere these days in the big games. Look at those point totals - didn't even get to 20 in any of those games, that's just plain awful offense.
__________________
King of my matchbox sized world
Brady'sButtBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-05-2013, 01:54 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 
randomk1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,603
Default Re: Think We Need A Better D? Maybe Not...

They looked plenty good enough when holding us to 13 points
Triumph and mosi like this.
__________________
Three out of Four. Back-to-back.
randomk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 01:57 PM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
Sicilian's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 3,853
Default Re: Think We Need A Better D? Maybe Not...

Balance wins championships. Gotta be able to score points, gotta be able to stall opponents drives. I'm hoping the Pats are going into this off-season trying to improve in both areas, not because they necessarily NEED either one desperately, but because if you're not trying to improve you're probably going to slip backwards.
Sicilian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 02:02 PM   #4
Brady to Dobson
 
Brady_to_Moss's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Blackjack table at Foxwoods
Posts: 11,881
My Mood: Cool
Send a message via AIM to Brady_to_Moss
Default Re: Think We Need A Better D? Maybe Not...

we need CBs and LBs that can cover and for the love of god we need a pass rush this year...
Triumph likes this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Brady_to_Moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 02:04 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
randomk1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,603
Default Re: Think We Need A Better D? Maybe Not...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brady_to_Moss View Post
we need CBs and LBs that can cover and for the love of god we need a pass rush this year...
Pass rush is overrated. Stop the run is where it's at.
__________________
Three out of Four. Back-to-back.
randomk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 02:13 PM   #6
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Rob0729's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25,367
Default Re: Think We Need A Better D? Maybe Not...

Baltimore's defense stepped up in the playoffs. They shut down the Colts. They stalled the Broncos (remember two of the Broncos' TDs were on special teams). They shutdown the Pats' offense in the second half. They shut down the 49ers' offense until they came out flat after an extra long halftime followed shortly after by a 35 minute break due to the blackout (this report focuses on yards and ignores the fact that the Ravens held the 49ers to 6 points in the first half).

Yes, in the regular season the Ravens' defense was mediocre. But in the playoffs, they played pretty well for the most part.
letekro and jmt57 like this.
Rob0729 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 02:14 PM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 
Palm Beach Pats Fan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,864
My Mood: Busy
Default Re: Think We Need A Better D? Maybe Not...

Some people simply cannot stop confusing YARDS ALLOWED with DEFENSE.

A part of defense is forcing turnovers.
A part of defense is making drives end in field goals rather than touchdowns, and short punts rather than FGs.
__________________
It is what it is, so just go out there and do your job!
Palm Beach Pats Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 02:17 PM   #8
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 562
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: Think We Need A Better D? Maybe Not...

the key is stops when you need them........we couldnt stop a nose bleed against the ravens...
__________________
Lock and loaded ......to give opposing quarterbacks the beating of their lives................


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


stay positive !!! If that doesn't work, go here
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
SONS_OF_BELICHICK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 02:26 PM   #9
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,297
Default Re: Think We Need A Better D? Maybe Not...

People look to blindly at many stats, yardage is one of the worst one to look at.

Of SB42, SB46 & the 2013AFCCG, only the last was the offense to blame. The other, the defense couldn't get off the field, the game was shrunk nearly in half, and the amount of points scored is muddled by the fact that offense didn't get that many touches (SB42 & SB46) and when it did, it's field position was atrocious (SB46).

The 13AFCCG falls squarely on the offense. It didn't execute when it needed to. The defense played as well as it's played in years in that first half, and the offense could've and should've buried the Ravens when it had the chance. But, it didn't execute, and in hindsight, we can see it also didn't have adequate personnel on the field without its stud TE.

Ultimately, without Gronkowski, our offense falls from elite to great, and against a great defense, its output may suffer. It's only elite part left was Brady, with Welker and Hernandez a tier below. When you have two blue chippers like Brady & Gronk, life becomes so much easier for everyone else, not just for the weapons, but the OLine. Gronk also has a huge effect on the run game.

The defense would've been fine with Talib. Obviously, the team needs more depth at CB, it needs to either retain or adequately replace Talib, and then add another corner of starting caliber. It was only a matter of time before Talib's loss was felt, and the offense had not built enough of a lead to endure it.

Overall, you have to be happy with the trajectory of this defense. It is trending up - and now good enough to win a title with.
Off The Grid likes this.
BradyManny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 02:28 PM   #10
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Rob0729's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25,367
Default Re: Think We Need A Better D? Maybe Not...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Palm Beach Pats Fan View Post
Some people simply cannot stop confusing YARDS ALLOWED with DEFENSE.

A part of defense is forcing turnovers.
A part of defense is making drives end in field goals rather than touchdowns, and short punts rather than FGs.
Yeah, I agree. Whenever I see an analysis that judges a defensive performance exclusively or near exclusively on yards allowed, I know that analysis is nothing more superficial hogwash.
.
Rob0729 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563