ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I still can't figure out why they wasted a 6th on Tom Frigging Brady, any draftnik could have told you that Giovanni Carmozzi was a much better prospect. Brady was the slowest QB ever at the Combine, and if you saw his picture there he looked more like one of those guys who criticize every draft than a player. Christ, what a waste, they had Micheal Bishop and Bledsoe already and Bishop had an absolute cannon and could run a 3.84 40.
So the Patriots drafted Tom Brady in the sixth round.
Is this brilliant move, then, prove that the Patriots cannot make bad drafting decisions? When they depart from the conventionally-rated prospects, does the drafting of Tom Brady prove the Patriots are smarter than everyone else?
I'm not sure even the Brady pick, in the 6th, is at all controversial. That's about where he was rated. I think the point above would have been stronger had Brady been rated at that level, when the Pats took him in the second, endured the controversy, and then won three Super Bowls.
I think we can all agree, hard as that is sometimes, that Wilson in the second was a surprise. Most folks who follow the draft closely expected him two to four rounds later. There's a decent industry assessing the NFL draft, and while none of us have access to the exact ratings of the other 31 teams, the people paid for their analysis had Wilson much later.
There were glimmers of upside in the preseason. Wilson seemed very good covering tight ends in August.
Then came a couple injuries. Extensive playing time for second round picks is nothing out of the ordinary. Especially for players who are the top pick at the top area of need. Again, most of us would agree that the Patriots secondary was the top area of need last offseason. Wilson was the top pick in the secondary. Not surprising he got some playing time.
In my opinion, his results were about what would have been expected, having reviewed his college production. Consistent with a player rated as a 5th rounder or so. He benefitted from a couple tips early. And then he showed real struggles picking up coverage. None of the strong coverage over the middle showed up in real games. Anyone remember a game in Seattle?
Of course, the concern going forward is the second year plummet in the Patriots secondary. Butler, Wheatley, Wilhite, McCourty. Players who showed promise in their rookie year had awful second seasons. Chung took an extra season to drop. Dowling delivered two incompletes. Could Wilson be the first recent player to challenge this trend?
Let's hope so.
However, if Wilson is pencilled as the starting safety for 2013, I'm not counting that toward the improved column for the New England secondary.
__________________
"Your father was a truck driver, Ray?"
- Trombley
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I love it. When PFF has a negative opinion of a Patriots player, there are 15 fanboys that scream "PFF sucks !" When PFF has a positive opinion of a Patriot player, no one says a word, all you hear is crickets.
Good to hear from PFF's resident representative and occasional Pats fan.
I think the reason people aren't screaming about PFF anymore is because it's been done a thousand times before, and most people are well aware that the site is to football analysis what the Daily Mail is to hard-hitting journalism.
I love it. When PFF has a negative opinion of a Patriots player, there are 15 fanboys that scream "PFF sucks !" When PFF has a positive opinion of a Patriot player, no one says a word, all you hear is crickets.
Ummm, a previous poster in this thread asked for a link to Tavon Wilson being one of the better rookie safetys. I simply googled "nfl rookie team" and it was one of the first sites to pop up. Sorry to ruffle you and DI's feathers. I don't have a strong enough opinion on PFF one way or the other to say whether they suck or not.
Where do Ebner and Gregory fit? The presumption being that McCourty stays at safety, who starts along side him? Where do options in FA and the draft come in?
With regard to the New England Patriots defensive backfield for the 2013 NFL Season:
So the Patriots drafted Tom Brady in the sixth round.
Is this brilliant move, then, prove that the Patriots cannot make bad drafting decisions? When they depart from the conventionally-rated prospects, does the drafting of Tom Brady prove the Patriots are smarter than everyone else?
Who said they can't make bad drafting decisions, I cited 2 in jackson and maroney, and they were "conventionally loved," whereas Mankins and Vollmer in particular were cited as huge reaches by the so called experts.
There is the thing urgent, the draft sites are basically looking at everything generically and most are simply rephrasing and regurgitating "analysis" from other draft sites. They don't understand the specific systems and real needs of each team and grade the players on some generically based rating that doesn't apply to team schemes, systems, and contract situations. And while there is always a general consensus as to who the top prospects are that pretty much falls apart after the first 60-70 picks, and it has no bearing on how teams have them stacked on their own boards because their assessments of their individual teams and it's needs are always radically different than the draft sites evaluations of them, which is why no draft site or draft "expert" ever comes even close to predicting any team's actual draft. Tavon Wilson is a great example of this, as was Sebastien Vollmer, as neither was invited to the combine or on any of the draft site's radar but both ended up as second round choices for the Patriots. So just because the self proclaimed experts don't rate then highly it doesn't mean that the teams feel the same way, and when they think a player is better than rated they are never going to say so because they don't want anyone to know any of what they are actually thinking.
I am not in any way suggesting the Patriots are always right on their picks and i have more than my share of WTF moments, however I do put their own analysis of prospects well above those of the Kipers or Wright's of the world as they have all the information and those people only a bit of it. The patriot's have done a poor job overall in drafting both WR and DB, but their drafting on the whole is good, and that's why they are able to stay on top while rebuilding an en tire team around Brady.
So the Patriots drafted Tom Brady in the sixth round.
Is this brilliant move, then, prove that the Patriots cannot make bad drafting decisions? When they depart from the conventionally-rated prospects, does the drafting of Tom Brady prove the Patriots are smarter than everyone else?
I'm not sure even the Brady pick, in the 6th, is at all controversial. That's about where he was rated. I think the point above would have been stronger had Brady been rated at that level, when the Pats took him in the second, endured the controversy, and then won three Super Bowls.
I would agree that Ivan's Brady analogy doesn't make sense. But it shouldn't take away from the validity of his MAIN point, which I quoted in my post, which I thought was right on the money.
Quote:
I think we can all agree, hard as that is sometimes, that Wilson in the second was a surprise. Most folks who follow the draft closely expected him two to four rounds later. There's a decent industry assessing the NFL draft, and while none of us have access to the exact ratings of the other 31 teams, the people paid for their analysis had Wilson much later.
This accurately sums up what we all thought back in April. To say most of us were "surprised" at the pick would be an understatement. But while not flawless, the Pats draft process is generally pretty astute. They obviously have a ton more information than the most informed draft services. They knew where "everybody" had Wilson slotted. So clearly they must have felt very strongly that Wilson was NOT going to last until the end of the 2nd round.
Quote:
There were glimmers of upside in the preseason. Wilson seemed very good covering tight ends in August. Then came a couple injuries. Extensive playing time for second round picks is nothing out of the ordinary. Especially for players who are the top pick at the top area of need. Again, most of us would agree that the Patriots secondary was the top area of need last offseason. Wilson was the top pick in the secondary. Not surprising he got some playing time.
can't disagree with this.
Quote:
In my opinion, his results were about what would have been expected, having reviewed his college production. Consistent with a player rated as a 5th rounder or so. He benefited from a couple tips early. And then he showed real struggles picking up coverage. None of the strong coverage over the middle showed up in real games. Anyone remember a game in Seattle?
This is overly harsh. I bet there were well over a dozen 2nd round picks who didn't play nearly as much or as well as Wilson, so to equate his play to a "5th rounder" makes no sense. And using the Seattle game to make your point? Low blow, Urgent. The 3rd game of his career, being thrown in after an injury, playing a new position...and he made a mistake?????. What a shock Its should also be noted that his partner at Safety was Nate Ebner, who had exactly 3 snaps at S his entire college career.
Quote:
However, if Wilson is pencilled as the starting safety for 2013, I'm not counting that toward the improved column for the New England secondary.
I don't know how he will turn out either, nor do I know if after the draft and FA, he will be a starting S. But based on his rookie year, I would expect to see a better S than we saw last year, and the one we saw last year wasn't bad.
I think we can all agree, hard as that is sometimes, that Wilson in the second was a surprise. Most folks who follow the draft closely expected him two to four rounds later. There's a decent industry assessing the NFL draft, and while none of us have access to the exact ratings of the other 31 teams, the people paid for their analysis had Wilson much later.
The thing you need to remember, is that there's a scouting service that about half the teams in the NFL use for almost all of their college scouting. That scouting service, which is pretty much where all the draftniks get their data, had Wilson rated late.
There are 16 or so teams that don't use that scouting service. Several of those teams (about 8 IIRC) use a 2nd scouting service, that is privately owned by those 8 teams, and doesn't release its data to the public/draftnicks.
The remaining 8 teams (to which the Patriots belong) have their own internal scouting departments.
So, basically, we know that there are 10 scouting agencies scouting college players for the NFL. We know that one of them had Wilson in the 6th round. We know that one other had Wilson in the 2nd round.
The problem here is that we have nowhere near enough info to make a reasonable assessment of whether or not Wilson went early. And 99% of the information we have comes from 1 source. We only get information (and incomplete information at that) from another source when a team picks a guy.
There's a decent industry assessing the NFL draft, and while none of us have access to the exact ratings of the other 31 teams, the people paid for their analysis had Wilson much later.
.
There is a huge industry now covering the draft but the problem with it is that most of it is pure garbage. The bulk of it is just internet regurgitation and much of it inaccurate. that doesn't mean however that there aren't people like Mayock who actually do the film work to give a reasonable analysis of college prospects, but he is clearly in the minority. the majority simply read other draftniks on the web and rephrase and repeat what has already been said about them. But even for guys like Mayock to have to take that and then apply the individual circumstances of each team to the prospects is a task that is simply too large. they can look at team needs in generic ways and be fairly accurate, e.g.. the Patriots need help at WR, OL, and DB. but there are more levels to team needs that even the most diligent "experts" don't have access to, such as impending retirements (e.g..Matt Light) or medical evaluations, or contract concerns that would leave holes that many wouldn't see coming.
Don't get me wrong, I love the draft and I usually spend a good deal of time looking at the prospects coming out and deciding who I like and who I don't want them to go after, I just have learned over time not to confuse that with any kind of expertise on the matter. When they drafted Wilson I had a big time WTF moment, especailly with LaVonte David still on the board, and he was a binky, but Belichick, right or wrong, has really good reasons for making that call, and he clearly sees the potential in Wilson to be a starting safety for this team. Ig he's wrong, and he has been before on DB's then people can say what they want about that. What i do take issue with is those who want to say he is wrong without giving the kid the chance to prove it one way or another, which has clearly been the case at this site.
34Likes
Re: Tavon Wilson
Linear Mode
