Can someone explain to me why the hit by Pollard was not a penalty.. - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree21Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-20-2013, 08:48 PM   #1
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,559
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Can someone explain to me why the hit by Pollard was not a penalty..

It was obviously a helmet to helmet hit, isn't that a penalty??

If so the fumble would have been negated, there would have been penalty yards and the down would have been taken over..

I keep hearing how it was a clean hit, did not look all that clean to this viewer....
Tbird100636 likes this.
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-20-2013, 08:51 PM   #2
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Sciz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,938
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Can someone explain to me why the hit by Pollard was not a penalty..

Helmet to helmet is only illegal on defenseless players. An RB with the ball is not defenseless.
Joker and Palm Beach Pats Fan like this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fake Nate Ebner
No big deal...only took me 3 defensive plays to be drafted before Tom Brady
Sciz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 08:53 PM   #3
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 423
My Mood: Cynical
Default Re: Can someone explain to me why the hit by Pollard was not a penalty..

Look -- I hate Pollard enough that I wanted to see someone do to his face what Kermit Washington did to Rudy T.

But that one was on Ridley. Pollard actually came in low and Ridley lowered his helmet right into Pollard's.
rlcarr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 08:53 PM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 
BradyBranch39's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: OH
Posts: 2,145
Default Re: Can someone explain to me why the hit by Pollard was not a penalty..

Can someone explain to me why in Goodell's Pansy Football League, it's ok to show an injury highlight reel of Pollard?
neuronet and Koma like this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
BradyBranch39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 08:56 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
jcdavey's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,629
Default Re: Can someone explain to me why the hit by Pollard was not a penalty..

i wish my team had pollard, dude is a destroyer
KontradictioN likes this.
jcdavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 09:00 PM   #6
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
BennyBledsoe's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 719
My Mood: Inspired
Default Re: Can someone explain to me why the hit by Pollard was not a penalty..

I thought helmet-to-helmet was on ANY play?

Unnecessary roughness is the one that changes based on whether or not they're defenseless, right?
__________________
Live in the Connecticut/SW Massachusetts area? Need a tutor for you or your kids? PM me!

Up until 1993, I didn't know the nickname 'Patsies' was an insult... that's what I grew up with during the late 80's and early 90's.

Go PATRIOTS!
BennyBledsoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 09:03 PM   #7
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Hardboiled's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West End
Posts: 1,032
Default Re: Can someone explain to me why the hit by Pollard was not a penalty..

Quote:
Originally Posted by BennyBledsoe View Post
I thought helmet-to-helmet was on ANY play?

Unnecessary roughness is the one that changes based on whether or not they're defenseless, right?
Nope. A runner is not defenseless.
Hardboiled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 09:07 PM   #8
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
BennyBledsoe's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 719
My Mood: Inspired
Default Re: Can someone explain to me why the hit by Pollard was not a penalty..

I thought helmet-to-helmet was on ANY play.

I guess I'll leave the rest of that statement out since it seems to confuse people.
__________________
Live in the Connecticut/SW Massachusetts area? Need a tutor for you or your kids? PM me!

Up until 1993, I didn't know the nickname 'Patsies' was an insult... that's what I grew up with during the late 80's and early 90's.

Go PATRIOTS!
BennyBledsoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 09:08 PM   #9
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 530
Default Re: Can someone explain to me why the hit by Pollard was not a penalty..

Theres no helmet to helmet penalty on the running back. It's only to protect Wide Receivers catching the ball. The runner can spear the defenders with his helmet as well. Like it or not it's the rule =/

I thought it was incredibly poor judgment not to rule the player down on the field, if the ball landed near Ridley and there was a pile on him, in his condition it could have been a very serious neck/spine injury.

An unconscious player going down with the ball should be ruled dead on the field. It needs to be a new rule next year. I know the Patriot's have benefited from it at times, but if player safety is really as important as we want to believe it is, it does need to be blown dead.
ChoWZa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 09:10 PM   #10
Rookie
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 47
Default Re: Can someone explain to me why the hit by Pollard was not a penalty..

The pats lost because they got out-played not because of the refs, stop Crying like Brady!!!
wrinkle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can someone explain to me GrogansArmy PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 14 01-28-2008 12:49 AM
Can somebody explain giogalindo PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 8 10-30-2007 12:45 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC