ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
All that I can say to this is: good. I'm glad to see someone standing up to Goodell, and if the facts aren't in Vilma's favor, then that will likely come out soon enough anyways. Vilma must be pretty confident in his case, I would think, to expose himself to the discovery process. Most potential outcomes of this lawsuit are good for us, as NFL and Patriots fans.
You have to be kidding? You want the thugs like Vilma to take
over NFL football? What Vilma is banking on is that he and the
other 22-27 liars can overcome Williams' testimony.
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Jonathan Vilma suing Roger Goodell for defamation
No matter what people think of Goodell as Commissioner, he is a very good lawyer, so I doubt he ever said anything about a player that is legally actionable.
As far as I know, what Goodell did say was that Vilma was a "leader" of the Saints' Bounty program, which I suspect is corroborated by third party statements. Vilma's suit, according to the article, states that he "never `pledged,' made or received payments of any kind encouraging or resulting from an opposing player being injured." Goodell's lawyers would drive a semi through the daylight between those two statements if the case ever got to court.
My personal view has always been that Goodell has "overpunished" the players and could have hit the coaches and management even harder. So, if he has more evidence on the players, it will no doubt now come out.
Vilma clearly feels singled out and dissed by all of this and, as the article states, his employment opportunities outside of football and his endorsement opportunities related to the game have probably all disappeared. Bad luck and Bad timing, Jonathan.
Re: Jonathan Vilma suing Roger Goodell for defamation
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77
While I understand your anger, I have no qualms with this: in order to win damages, Vilma will likely have to show that Goodell's statement is having/has had a negative impact on his current/future earning potentials.
As far as I know, and please do correct me if I am wrong as I might well be wrong, all Goodell has said of Vilma is that he was a "leader" of the Saint's Bounty program. That either is or is not a matter of corroborated fact in the public domain.
It is almost impossible to imagine that a "lawyer's lawyer" like Roger Goodell would make a statement like that about an individual if it were not both corroborated and public. So, even if it does have a negative impact on Vilma's earning potential, Goodell would have no liability.
__________________
It is what it is. It wasn't what it wasn't.
Re: Jonathan Vilma suing Roger Goodell for defamation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mainefan
...
Vilma, on the other hand, has a career and a reputation to salvage, if possible, and the damage is so devastating that he feels forced to try everything--the appeals, the suit, etc. Maybe Vilma has been unfairly singled out. Maybe he's been no worse than many others. But he did what he did. His reaction reminds me of the reaction of some of the baseball steroid-users.
Are you saying Vilma = Clemmons? I mean without the perjury before Congress.
__________________
I've seen 1-15 and 2-14 twice. I've seen the Patriots as relevant underdogs, hated favorites, and absolutely irrelevant. Hated is not the best, but it far, far, far from the worst.
Re: Jonathan Vilma suing Roger Goodell for defamation
Quote:
Originally Posted by 37Harrison
2004: $230,000 Signing Bonus: $6.03 million
2005: $305,000
2006: $667,500
2007: $750,000
2008: $4,097,500
2009: $3,300,000; $17.2 million guaranteed; Signing Bonus: $6 million
2010: $4,000,000
2011: $5,130,000
This is what Vilma has been paid over the course of the years... it totals over $30M! I have a MAJOR problem with the bolded part of Vilmas' lawer's statement: "By making these false and public statements, he has significantly harmed Jonathan's reputation and ability to make a living."
FU rich F'n F's!
I have a lot of trouble with the suit (I suspect that it's groundless), but I have no trouble with his wanting to be able to make money going forward. He has every right to defend his ability to do so, if he feels he has been wronged. What he has or has not earned in the past is irrelevant.
Re: Jonathan Vilma suing Roger Goodell for defamation
PFT makes a good point in that Vilma's court documents and public statements say he “never paid, or intended to pay” bounty's, but he doesn't make any indication of whether he offered the bounty's.
Obviously his lawyers have tip toed around whether he offered the $10k and want public opinion to sway to their side by making him look innocent with the "never paid or intented to pay". I doubt this ever will make it to court and Vilma probably doesn't even want it to get to court.
If I was Vilma I would be more pissed at the Saints organization then the commish. If they would have shut down the bounty program when they were told to he wouldn't have been suspended and would be making his millions and his name wouldn't be dragged through the mud. He should sue his coaches and GM for the amount of salary he will lose.
Re: Jonathan Vilma suing Roger Goodell for defamation
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW!
The guy has 8-10 years to make enough money for he and his family to be set for life. This is his career, and being suspended for a year and made a pariah for one of the biggest scandals in league history is hurting his ability to profit from this career.
I don't understand why you have a problem with this.
I have a problem with it because he already has enough money for he and his family to be set for life. He has made over $30 million dollars already in his career. How in the hell has it jeopardized his ability to make a living? Seriously, if making over $30 million isn't enough to make a living on for you and your kids then the majority of us are screwed. A family rigt now is fortunate to have two workings parents that are clearing over $160k for the year while raising their family.
I have no problem with the reputation part.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Jonathan Vilma suing Roger Goodell for defamation
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanSince74
No matter what people think of Goodell as Commissioner, he is a very good lawyer, so I doubt he ever said anything about a player that is legally actionable.
.
Hold on Sparky. Goodell has a BA in economics but not a JD and as far as I know, never attended law school. He may have a stable of lawyers in his employ but he is not one himself. As a result, he may have a very good knowledge of the law, slander, libel, defamation, New York Times malice et al... but his background is PR, not law.
37Likes
Re: Jonathan Vilma suing Roger Goodell for defamation
Linear Mode
