Why Steelers take Holmes over Jackson? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > NFL Football Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-02-2006, 11:53 PM   #1
JR4
In the Starting Line-up
 
JR4's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,631
My Mood: Inspired
Default Why Steelers take Holmes over Jackson?

They even traded up I think. After seeing Chads videos
and stats, I would have thought Steelers would have take the bigger,
heavier but just as fast Jackson.
Some reports seem to indicate Holes will have a hard time with jams at this
level.
It seems Jackson's hands are superb ... I doubt Holmes could be any better.

Not complaining but just wondering. Maybe BB has an angel up there helping
him. He sure seems blessed.
JR4 is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-03-2006, 12:05 AM   #2
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
zippo59's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Who wants to know?
Posts: 5,072
Default

The only thing I can think of is the general consensus that Holmes runs better routes.
__________________
"What Tom Brady just did gives me goose bumps."-John Madden after final drive in SB 36


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Unofficial Kevin Faulk supporter.
zippo59 is offline  
Old 05-03-2006, 12:16 AM   #3
Hok
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Hok's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 684
Default

Same reason we took Maroney over Williams. Holmes was rated higher on their board.
Hok is offline  
Old 05-03-2006, 12:19 AM   #4
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
zippo59's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Who wants to know?
Posts: 5,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hok
Same reason we took Maroney over Williams. Holmes was rated higher on their board.
Clearly, but the question is why was he rated higher on their board?
__________________
"What Tom Brady just did gives me goose bumps."-John Madden after final drive in SB 36


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Unofficial Kevin Faulk supporter.
zippo59 is offline  
Old 05-03-2006, 12:22 AM   #5
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zippo59
Clearly, but the question is why was he rated higher on their board?
The only thing that comes to mind is route running. Holmes is allegedy a superb route runner; whereas C-Jack's routes aren't the crispest. Virtually every other measurable goes to Jackson though.
Ahriman is offline  
Old 05-03-2006, 12:22 AM   #6
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
JJDChE's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,821
My Mood: Amused
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zippo59
Clearly, but the question is why was he rated higher on their board?
Impossible to speculate. They just liked him better.
JJDChE is offline  
Old 05-03-2006, 12:53 AM   #7
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JR4
They even traded up I think. After seeing Chads videos
and stats, I would have thought Steelers would have take the bigger,
heavier but just as fast Jackson.
Some reports seem to indicate Holes will have a hard time with jams at this
level.
...
I guess I'm just stunned to see this on a Pats board. The Pats have won 3 Super Bowls with a lot of tiny WR's on their roster. The Pittsburgh Steelers just won a SB with Cedric Wilson and Randle EL and Hines - 5'11" - Ward.

Getting rid of Pepsico Burden opened the way to the promised land.

Who did they draft? Santanio Holmes and Willie Reid - think they're worried about small WR's beating the jam? Watch some football. Small WR's usually slide through the jam like it's not there.

Tampa Bay had big receivers in 2003. They're history.

St Louis had skinny Bruce and "I'm 6' with my fingers crossed" Holt.

Baltimore's leading SB WR was Brandon Stokley.

When is this big WR insanity going to go away, because it's largely balogna. The first round of the NFL is a garbage bag stuffed full of failed big WR's. Most of them suck.

If Chad Jackson ends up able to escape the jam as well as Santonio Holmes does, it will be because he can make the same athletic moves that Holmes can make. It will have very little to do with his bench press, or his pounds, or his height.

Somebody in NE had better wake up because big WR's, which the Pats have shown a recent bent toward having, have been watching Deion Branch play football from their big WR couches. They've been Watching Troy Brown play football. What happens when Randy Moss and Troy Brown compare rings?

Your flirtations with David Terrell, Donald Hayes, Andre Davis, etc. are disturbing. Forget those losers. Right now, I have my doubts Chad Jackson will be any better than Jabar Gaffney.
Johnny Z is offline  
Old 05-03-2006, 01:28 AM   #8
Practice Squad
 
kierkegaard's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 120
Default

Jabar Gaffney? *shudders*
kierkegaard is offline  
Old 05-03-2006, 01:33 AM   #9
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 882
Default

not a bad post, Steeler fan, but I hope you're wrong about Jackson.

Also, I don't think the Pats look for the bigger reciever at all. Givens was the biggest starter we've had during the run . Tim Dwight, David Patten.... all small guys.

Even going back before that with Terry Glenn (she was short), Shawn Jefferson were both under 6'. not sure who else is worth mentioning, but they were commonly small recievers
D-cleater is offline  
Old 05-03-2006, 01:40 AM   #10
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
zippo59's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Who wants to know?
Posts: 5,072
Default

Size is overrated for WR but it is good to have both because Deion isn't going to outjump anyone for balls.
__________________
"What Tom Brady just did gives me goose bumps."-John Madden after final drive in SB 36


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Unofficial Kevin Faulk supporter.
zippo59 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC