OT: Brandon Marshall involved in another scuffle - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > NFL Football Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-22-2009, 10:24 PM   #11
Banned
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 362
Default Re: OT: Brandon Marshall involved in another scuffle

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice_Ice_Brady View Post
I'd rather have 2-3 good receivers than one great one. It's too easy for the defense to shut down one guy. Take Moss or Welker out of our system and the offense sputters... unlike 2007 when we had 4 good wideouts. Also, while Marshall is talented, T.O. might have been worth the headache, but T.O. was a proven top-3 NFL receiver for years. Marshall is a rising star but hasn't proven he will consistently put up huge production. His off-field issues are disturbing.

Anyway, if I were Miami I would look to the draft.
See, man, we did that and we got Brian Hartline (who has played okay) and Patrick Turner (who hasn't seen the field yet.) I just want to be able to go into games knowing we have a guy that is going to catch it 7 times for 100 yards and a score. And to have confidence that our guys will make that big 3rd and 7. We don't have that right now (Davone Bess makes some plays, but not enough.)

We're deep at WR but it's not a good kind of depth. It's medicore depth.

Davone Bess = Good slot guy
Ted Ginn = Return man, below average WR
Greg Camarillo = Average
Brian Hartline = Too young to tell

But I think you put a guy like Marshal in there and all of a sudden Camarillo and Bess see their value sky rocket somewhat.

Last edited by Wide_Receiver; 11-22-2009 at 10:25 PM..
Wide_Receiver is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-22-2009, 10:26 PM   #12
Banned
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 362
Default Re: OT: Brandon Marshall involved in another scuffle

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanP421 View Post
Hahaa. Yeah cause if you had Marshall you wouldn't be 5-5, but you'd be 7--3 and you wouldn't have lost to the Pats right? Give me a break. I work with a guy who's a Dolphins fan, and he's clueless as well. Does it run in the fanbase?...no offense, just wondering.
I won't be debating with posts that attack like this nor will I deal with someone that just wants to get into a **** talking war. No offense.
Wide_Receiver is offline  
Old 11-22-2009, 10:35 PM   #13
Banned
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 267
Default Re: OT: Brandon Marshall involved in another scuffle

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wide_Receiver View Post
I won't be debating with posts that attack like this nor will I deal with someone that just wants to get into a **** talking war. No offense.
Not * talking war here. Just calling it like it is man. You said if you had Marshall, you would win the division, I found that a little goofy. No offense intended. I just disagree with you and I don't hide it....Try on some thicker skin.
RyanP421 is offline  
Old 11-22-2009, 10:44 PM   #14
Banned
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 362
Default Re: OT: Brandon Marshall involved in another scuffle

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanP421 View Post
Not * talking war here. Just calling it like it is man. You said if you had Marshall, you would win the division, I found that a little goofy. No offense intended. I just disagree with you and I don't hide it....Try on some thicker skin.
Well I've been in ****ting matches here before and it doesn't do anybody any good so I'd just rather not.

As for the topic, I've seen us drop 2 touchdows against the Colts (one with 30 seconds left that would've been the game winner) and then a drop against the SAints that resulted in a pick 6. We also had abut 5 drops in that game and a lost fumble from a wide out.

So if we had Brandon Marshal, there is NO DOUBT in my mind that we'd be 7-3. The same way the Bengals would probably be 8-2 right now if Cedric Benson hadn't missed today. It's the same concept. Or how you guys would've been 12-4 at worst with Brady last year.
Wide_Receiver is offline  
Old 11-22-2009, 11:17 PM   #15
Banned
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 267
Default Re: OT: Brandon Marshall involved in another scuffle

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wide_Receiver View Post
Well I've been in ****ting matches here before and it doesn't do anybody any good so I'd just rather not.

As for the topic, I've seen us drop 2 touchdows against the Colts (one with 30 seconds left that would've been the game winner) and then a drop against the SAints that resulted in a pick 6. We also had abut 5 drops in that game and a lost fumble from a wide out.

So if we had Brandon Marshal, there is NO DOUBT in my mind that we'd be 7-3. The same way the Bengals would probably be 8-2 right now if Cedric Benson hadn't missed today. It's the same concept. Or how you guys would've been 12-4 at worst with Brady last year.
Right cause if you had Marshall, everything else would have happened the same, and you would have gotten to those situations exactly the same, and everything would be the same except those dropped TD passes would have been to him and he would have caught them right? Give me a break, man. You know better than that. Your offense would be completely different and the game plans would be completely different, so you don't know really. It's juts stupid to say that you would NO DOUBT be 7-3 if Marshall was a Dolphin..

I can't believe I'm even debating this with someone. You won't find anyone that's not a Dolphin fan that will agree with you.

If the Patriots had Rashard Mendenhall, we would be undefeated. haha, (sarcasm)

Last edited by RyanP421; 11-22-2009 at 11:20 PM..
RyanP421 is offline  
Old 11-23-2009, 01:33 PM   #16
Banned
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 362
Default Re: OT: Brandon Marshall involved in another scuffle

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanP421 View Post
Right cause if you had Marshall, everything else would have happened the same, and you would have gotten to those situations exactly the same, and everything would be the same except those dropped TD passes would have been to him and he would have caught them right? Give me a break, man. You know better than that. Your offense would be completely different and the game plans would be completely different, so you don't know really. It's juts stupid to say that you would NO DOUBT be 7-3 if Marshall was a Dolphin..

I can't believe I'm even debating this with someone. You won't find anyone that's not a Dolphin fan that will agree with you.

If the Patriots had Rashard Mendenhall, we would be undefeated. haha, (sarcasm)
At what point did the Patriots have a chance to acquire Mendenhal? Marshal and Boldin were both available this off-season and we should've pounced. I don't see why it's so ridiculous to think that if our team was better, we'd have a better record.

It's like saying, "You know damn well if the Patriots would've had Welker in that in that first Jets game, there would've been no difference."
Wide_Receiver is offline  
Old 11-23-2009, 01:38 PM   #17
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,371
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: OT: Brandon Marshall involved in another scuffle

Edwards will be available as a FA after his last couple excerable games as a JET.

Other possibilities include trading Miami's #1 pick for Julian Edelperson, a larger younger Wes Welker and much better than the touted Ginn Family wasted Top 10 pick. But as a fan I'd hate to see Edes traded.

Where can I get a picture of a homeless bum to post as MY sig?
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
PatsWickedPissah is online now  
Old 11-23-2009, 01:39 PM   #18
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
bigcountry75's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 588
My Mood: Bored
Default Re: OT: Brandon Marshall involved in another scuffle

My only thing would be that the dolphins need a QB before they can start going after these "stud" wr's......henne is decent but not the answer....They have a solid running game so if they had a QB I would say they would be near the top of the division but without a proven QB or one with a lot of promise they are right about where I thought they would be .500
bigcountry75 is offline  
Old 11-23-2009, 02:17 PM   #19
In the Starting Line-up
 
condon84's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,682
Default Re: OT: Brandon Marshall involved in another scuffle

Dolphins should trade for Boldin and find a draft pick that can be a deep threat. Ginn could be that person, but the guy needs to catch the ball.

Someone to stretch the field that teams have to cover and someone who can exploit the underneath coverage. You can take a chance on Braylon or try to trade for Marshall, but I'd rather trade for a gamer like Boldin and then take a speedy wideout in the draft.

Steelers have been great at finding speedy wideouts of late. First it was Santonio Holmes and now they've got Mike Wallace. It's giving Hines Ward a lot of space underneath.
condon84 is online now  
Old 11-23-2009, 02:20 PM   #20
Banned
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 362
Default Re: OT: Brandon Marshall involved in another scuffle

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigcountry75 View Post
My only thing would be that the dolphins need a QB before they can start going after these "stud" wr's......henne is decent but not the answer....They have a solid running game so if they had a QB I would say they would be near the top of the division but without a proven QB or one with a lot of promise they are right about where I thought they would be .500
Any reason Henne is not the answer or just a gut feeling?
Wide_Receiver is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WR Brandon Marshall 6'6" Box_O_Rocks Patriots Draft Talk 15 01-30-2006 12:12 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563