My Blueprint For the Pats - Page 23 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree190Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2012, 09:16 PM   #221
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Merril Hoge's Tie Knot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 761
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
While Cannon has not played "GUARD" per se, there were more than a few times last year, in goal line situations, where Cannon would come in and would line up inside between Waters at RG and Solder who was playing on the line as a RT.
You know what that's called? Of course you don't. It's called playing tackle. Solder is the third tackle in that formation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
Belichick has never had an O-lineman, previously, who was 350 lbs and only 10% body fat and was as athletic as Cannon. So, saying he's never had a guard at that weight has no bearing on the situation at all..
And he still doesn't. You keep saying Cannon is 10% BF, and people keep saying you're wrong. Every time somebody asks you for a reputable link, you stop replying. So I'll ask again. Do you have a reputable link that says he is 10% BF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
We do not know what goes on during the non-public parts of practice. Do you honestly believe that BB wouldn't have Cannon take reps at RG? Or that the reps he took while lined up between Waters and Solder couldn't be considered RG reps?
He does take some reps at guard in practice. Tackles and guards take limited reps at the opposite position all the time. If they have to fill in during a game they have to have some experience there.
Merril Hoge's Tie Knot is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 12-01-2012, 10:22 PM   #222
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Merril Hoge's Tie Knot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 761
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Eyes View Post
The O-lineman goes to an area and blocks whoever's there are opposed to blocking a specific players, yes? Why would Cannon be incapable of that?
Well he is and does, but at tackle, and not guard. Belichick demands a lot from his guards. Especially in technique and short area quickness. Neither are things Cannon has in abundance.
Merril Hoge's Tie Knot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2012, 05:47 AM   #223
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
mayoclinic's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Eyes View Post
I love it, you covered a lot of ground, I'd have preferred someone on the edge on the D-line, even if it's a late round guy like David Bass, but I;d be super-excited if we did exactly what you had here.
To be clear, I would use Ra'shede Hageman as an edge player in the mold of a JJ Watt or a Justin Smith who could move inside at times, especially if the Pats also draft a true DT to rotate along with Wilfork and Love. At 6'6" 300# with 4.78 speed and the explosiveness that goes with a 35" vertical at that weight I think that Hageman could excel outside or inside. Outside, he's got the length and strength to 2-gap and the ability to set the edge, but the explosiveness and quickness to generate pressure. Inside, he's too fast for guards. Kick him inside on 3rd down and use Ninkovich or Cunningham on the edge.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
mayoclinic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2012, 07:16 AM   #224
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,671
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
To be clear, I would use Ra'shede Hageman as an edge player in the mold of a JJ Watt or a Justin Smith who could move inside at times, especially if the Pats also draft a true DT to rotate along with Wilfork and Love. At 6'6" 300# with 4.78 speed and the explosiveness that goes with a 35" vertical at that weight I think that Hageman could excel outside or inside. Outside, he's got the length and strength to 2-gap and the ability to set the edge, but the explosiveness and quickness to generate pressure. Inside, he's too fast for guards. Kick him inside on 3rd down and use Ninkovich or Cunningham on the edge.
I've just watched him in one game against UNLV and man, he can't handle double teams, ends up playing cover 1 he's pushed so far back (I know you're not mocking him to the Pats to play double teams). The athleticism's there but in that game, not a lot else. I've got some other games of his so I'll look deeper.

Edit: A Gopher forum discussing Hageman.

http://www.forums.gopherhole.com/boa...th-considering

Last edited by manxman2601; 12-02-2012 at 07:24 AM..
manxman2601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2012, 08:15 AM   #225
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
mayoclinic's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by manxman2601 View Post
I've just watched him in one game against UNLV and man, he can't handle double teams, ends up playing cover 1 he's pushed so far back (I know you're not mocking him to the Pats to play double teams). The athleticism's there but in that game, not a lot else. I've got some other games of his so I'll look deeper.

Edit: A Gopher forum discussing Hageman.

PiPress: Ra'Shede Hageman says an early exit to the NFL is worth considering
Hageman has a ton of athleticism and talent, but he's not as far ahead at this point as some others. He has switched positions, so there's a bit of an explanation, and the motor seems to be coming on. We've seen a lot of athletic guys take a year or so to figure things out, then explode once they get the hang of things. JJ Watt and Sheldon Richardson come to mind. I had Hageman going around 100, and I think he'd be a good value in that range. Tony Pauline predicts he will be a top 120 pick if he declares. He's not an elite player right now, but he does have a ton of upside.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
mayoclinic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2012, 08:17 AM   #226
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,671
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
I wasn't going to put out an update to my "blueprint" until after the end of the regular season and probably the January 15 deadline for players to declare, but here's an interim version of where my thoughts currently are.



The Draft:

I want to go defense and particularly focus on the DL early on. The guys I would consider taking with a 1st round pick are:

1. Star Lotulelei, DT, Utah - will be long gone
2. Johnathan Hankins, DT, Ohio St. - will probably be long gone
3. Louis Nix, DT, Notre Dame - probably won't come out, and if he does, will probably be long gone.
4. Jesse Williams, DT, Alabama - one of my favorites for a long time now.
5. Sheldon Richardson, DT/DE, Missouri - great pentrating ability, athleticism and burst. But is he a schematic fit, and what about the character and intelligence issues? Will also probably be gone.
6. Dion Jordan, DE/OLB, Oregon - incredible fluidity in space. Where does he fit?
7. Ziggy Ansah, DE, BYU - incredible athleticism and upside, but still raw.
8. Alec Ogletree, LB, Georgia - great length and fluidity. Former safety, has Urlacher-like of length and movement skills. Will probably be gone, but even if not, would be take another LB that high?

The only offensive player I would consider taking is probably Jonathan Cooper. But I really prefer going defense.

I'm assuming that all 8 of those guys may be off the board by #32, in which case I'd probably advocate something along the lines of the following:

***Trade: Pats trade #32 (590 points) for #40 and #103 (588 points). With all of my top guys gone by #32, the Pats trade back and pick up an extra 4th round pick.

40. Sylvester Williams, DT, North Carolina. 6'4" 320#. Currently NFL Draftscout #67.



Stud Horse!
I'm assuming in this mock that all of my top guys listed above are gone before the Pats pick. In that case, I see BB trading back for a modest pick up. Williams is an extremely talented DT who slips a bit because of a deep and talented class and because he is a slightly older prospect, having spent 2 years in a manufacturing plant before going to community college and then to North Carolina. I'm not normally a fan of North Carolina players, but Williams has a great motor, terrific core strength, and great athleticism for a big man. He is strong against the run and has the strength to handle double teams, but is explosive enough to collapse the pocket and penetrate. He has nice positional versatility, playing either 4-3 DT position, 3-4 NT, and even some 3-4 DE. A rotation of Vince Wilfork, Kyle Love and Williams would be beastly. Kawann Short (#39 on Draftscout's list) could also be an option. Again, I'd rather have Jesse Williams or Louis Nix, but I'm not convinced they'll be available.

***Trade: Pats trade #62 (284 points) for 3rd and 4th round picks. Call it something like #80 and #100 for now (290 points).

80. Da'Rick Rogers, WR, Tennessee Tech. Currently NFL Draftscout #76.



Stud Horse!
Rogers has Dez Bryant kind of ability, with some of the same issues - but at the price of a 3rd round pick instead of a 1st, he may be worth the gamble. I'd personally rather have Tavon Austin or Cordarelle Patterson, but neither is likely to be available this late. Taking a WR like Markus Wheaton or Steadman Bailey later may be an alternative.

94. Kyle Long, OT, Oregon. 6'7" 311#. Currently NFL Draftscout #74.



Beast!
No longer a sleeper, Kyle Long is just a beast, with incredible athleticism, and a mean streak.

Tony Pauline has suggested that Long could go as high as the mid 2nd round, though that seems a bit of a reach. I have him in the late 3rd/early 4th for now, as a top 100 pick. The Pats could conceivably take him earlier instead of a WR and then go for someone late Markus Wheaton or Stedman Bailey a bit later. Ohio St. OT Reid Fragel (6'8" 305#, former TE with terrific athletic ability) might be a nice sleeper option if Long goes earlier than expected.

100. Ra'shede Hageman, DT/DE, Minnesota. 6'6" 300#. Currently NR by NFLDraftScout for 2013, but predicted to declare.



Sleeper Beast!
A former TE and basketball player, Hageman has JJ Watt size and raw athleticism, but is just scratching his surface. Reportedly has 4.78 speed with a 35" vertical, can windmill dunk at 300#. Was a backup until this year, then exploded as the Gophers' best lineman. Hageman couldn't be blocked one on one this year, and now routinely draws double teams. He has the frame to get bigger, but could play outside as a 4-3 LDE/3-4 DE, and move inside on passing downs. His upside is ridiculous. If the Pats don't snag Ziggy Ansah or Sheldon Richardson early on, I hope they grab Hageman.

103. Brian Winters, OL, Kent St. 6'4" 310#. Currently NFL Draftscout #101.



Sleeper Stud Horse!
Winters fits the Pats profile of moving college OTs inside to guard. A small school prospect, he has nice athleticism and footwork. He's an excellent run blocker who mauls defenders. With his scruffy beard and blue collar game, he fits nicely into the Matt Light/Logan Mankins kind of mold.

5 (comp). Phillip Thomas, S, Fresno St. 6'1" 215#. Currently NFL Draftscout #171.



Sleeper!
A Thorpe award finalist with 8 interceptions including 3 for TDs this year, Rob Rang calls Thomas "the best safety no one has ever heard of".

6 (comp). Tyrann Mathieu, DB, LSU. 5'9" 176#. Currently NFL Draftscout #187.



Fallen Beast!
The Honey Badger becomes the 2013 version of Aaron Hernandez/Alfonzo Dennard, a day 1 or 2 pick who slips to day 3 because of off field issues and gets snatched up by BB. Mathieu is undersized and doesn't have elite man coverage skills. But he is a heat seeking missile and ball hawk par extraordinaire who can be moved all around the secondary to create disruption. He's a big risk without a true position and multiple off field issues leading to his dismissal from LSU, but as a day 3 pick the upside is too great to ignore.

7a. Alonzo Highsmith, LB, Arkansas. 6'1" 235#. Currently NFL Draftscout #400.



Wounded Sleeper!
Highsmith would have been a mid round pick and possibly better if he had stayed healthy.

7b.Nick Kasa, TE, Colorado. 6'6" 260#. Currently NFL Draftscout #232.



Super Sleeper!
With Travis Kelce no longer a sleeper, Kasa could be a late round bargain. Whereas Ra'shede Hageman was a TE recruit who has thrived on the DL, Kasa was a 4 star DE recruit who has thrived since being moved to TE. He has a basketball background to boot.


Another excellently considered mock.

1. Sylvester Williams.

If we're going for a one gap DT high, other than Sheldon Richardson, Williams would be my choice. However, I'm not overly keen on it as a first pick. Part of that is a philosophical difference between you and I. I just don't think the value on DT is all that great. Jesse Williams, Louis Nix, Sheldon Richardson and Hankins are special enough to provide value with the first pick but I don't think Williams is. I'd take him with a second rounder but only providing we got a top quality player first. Still like him mind.

2. Da'Rick Rogers

I'm conflicted here. There's a lot to like about Rogers' skillset but his speed and character concern me. If the Pats draft him then great, he's passed the interview, but personally, I think he's too much of a risk.

3. Kyle Long

I haven't seen him so can't comment. Love the measurables and bloodlines though. I'll take your word on his ability.

4. Ra'Shede Hageman

See my post above. As a situational rusher, he's a fine upside pick but his inability to hold up against the run would be a concern.

5. Brian Winters

Excellent pick. Would take this in a heartbeat. As you've said, he's an ideal choice to move inside. If I didn't love Cooper so much, Winters would be close to my second choice for interior OL.

6. Philip Thomas

This is ambitious. I've seen him talked about as a potential first rounder and possible best safety in the class which would be a nice though unlikely bargain at this point.

7. Tyrann Mathieu.

Would have no problem with the pick at this juncture. Stick him on special teams and let him earn BB's trust. Very little risk and potentially high reward.

8. Alonzo Highsmith

Don't know enough to comment although I remember him standing out from time to time last year when I watched Arkansas so fine pick at this point.

9. Nick Kasa

Now we're talking. Love this pick.


I realise that this probably comes across as a little too negative and for that I apologise. As a draft, it would satisfy me, it just doesn't excite me because there isn't that franchise type player in there like a #1 WR, elite OL or DL or an athletic beast like Ogletree.
manxman2601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2012, 08:32 AM   #227
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
mayoclinic's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by manxman2601 View Post
Another excellently considered mock.

1. Sylvester Williams.

If we're going for a one gap DT high, other than Sheldon Richardson, Williams would be my choice. However, I'm not overly keen on it as a first pick. Part of that is a philosophical difference between you and I. I just don't think the value on DT is all that great. Jesse Williams, Louis Nix, Sheldon Richardson and Hankins are special enough to provide value with the first pick but I don't think Williams is. I'd take him with a second rounder but only providing we got a top quality player first. Still like him mind.

2. Da'Rick Rogers

I'm conflicted here. There's a lot to like about Rogers' skillset but his speed and character concern me. If the Pats draft him then great, he's passed the interview, but personally, I think he's too much of a risk.

3. Kyle Long

I haven't seen him so can't comment. Love the measurables and bloodlines though. I'll take your word on his ability.

4. Ra'Shede Hageman

See my post above. As a situational rusher, he's a fine upside pick but his inability to hold up against the run would be a concern.

5. Brian Winters

Excellent pick. Would take this in a heartbeat. As you've said, he's an ideal choice to move inside. If I didn't love Cooper so much, Winters would be close to my second choice for interior OL.

6. Philip Thomas

This is ambitious. I've seen him talked about as a potential first rounder and possible best safety in the class which would be a nice though unlikely bargain at this point.

7. Tyrann Mathieu.

Would have no problem with the pick at this juncture. Stick him on special teams and let him earn BB's trust. Very little risk and potentially high reward.

8. Alonzo Highsmith

Don't know enough to comment although I remember him standing out from time to time last year when I watched Arkansas so fine pick at this point.

9. Nick Kasa

Now we're talking. Love this pick.


I realise that this probably comes across as a little too negative and for that I apologise. As a draft, it would satisfy me, it just doesn't excite me because there isn't that franchise type player in there like a #1 WR, elite OL or DL or an athletic beast like Ogletree.
Good comments, and not negative at all. A couple of thoughts:

1. Sylvester Wiliams isn't my first choice but I think he's a good value pick. He has enough ability to both one- and two-gap IMHO. I tried to make it clear in this mock that my top choices were all gone before the Pats pick. I think a trade back for Williams would be reasonable value.

2. Rogers. Like you, I'm conflicted. I like Tavon Austin and Cordarelle Patterson more. I like Markus Wheaton and Steadman Bailey as value picks, as I suggested in the mock. Rogers has issues. I could go either way, and am happy to let the Pats do their homework on him. He's not a personal binky of mine, but if he fell to the #80 range he would be a good value from a talent perspective.

3. Phillip Thomas. I don't really expect him to be available this late, though the draft is unpredictable. I just hadn't included him, and wanted to. I don't know if I would take a safety high enough for where he'll eventually go - probably day 2. Rob Rang has him as his #50 player on his big board. Other than Matt Elam, I may like him the best of the available safeties.

In general, the late picks (5 and on) were throwing darts at possible "values". It's a crapshoot as to who will be available. But this is a fairly deep draft, and there are talented players who should be available day 3.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
mayoclinic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 06:04 AM   #228
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,671
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Starting to hope Aqib Talib wasn't a waste of a 4th round pick. Was possibly the worst defensive player yesterday.
manxman2601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 07:26 AM   #229
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
mayoclinic's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by manxman2601 View Post
Starting to hope Aqib Talib wasn't a waste of a 4th round pick. Was possibly the worst defensive player yesterday.
It certainly wasn't a good game from Talib. Not sure who miscommunicated on the play where he obviously thought he had safety coverage deep, and Tannehill overthrew the wide open receiver. There were several plays where his coverage was poor, no question. But the overall secondary play was still significantly improved from earlier in the year, and Tannehill was held to under 50% completion with no TDs.
ctpatsfan77 likes this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
mayoclinic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 07:42 AM   #230
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,671
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
It certainly wasn't a good game from Talib. Not sure who miscommunicated on the play where he obviously thought he had safety coverage deep, and Tannehill overthrew the wide open receiver. There were several plays where his coverage was poor, no question. But the overall secondary play was still significantly improved from earlier in the year, and Tannehill was held to under 50% completion with no TDs.
Agreed.

I think this is part McCourty at Safety, Arrington in the slot and particularly Dennard at the other Corner. Dennard isn't perfect and I worry about his long speed but he fights to make a play on every pass. And a more aggressive defense, Gregory blitzed at least twice for example.
manxman2601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pats layed the blueprint for the Steelers? DisgruntledTunaFan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 2 12-22-2007 12:31 AM
Ravens have the true blueprint to beat the Pats AndyJohnson PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 7 12-04-2007 08:18 PM
Blueprint to Beat the Pats JR4 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 5 12-04-2007 10:12 AM
I guess the Pats now have the blueprint... Patradomous PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 9 11-27-2007 12:03 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563