Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
re: Trading Up (DL Melvin Ingram or Michael Brockers)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrNathanDrake
.
From 2006-2010 we have had 15 picks in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. Out of those 15 picks only 4 have turned out good. 11 have been BUSTS on our team. I am not counting last year since it's too early to tell still.
I hope you aren't an accountant, because your numbers don't add up. Because if they did you would have to name me the 11 busts that came out of the 2nd round.....and you CAN'T because they don't exist. A lot of those 2nd rounders were used in trades for players and future picks (ie Wes Welker, Rob Gronkowski) But that's alright. Bernie Madoff thought your "accounting" was just fine
I also find it interesting that you are willing to use our very limited resources to select 2 of the riskiest boom or bust choices on the board.
Ingram is just 6'1 and has very short arms. He'd fit fine in the Steelers D, but ours? He also plays a position that requires a couple of years to mature. Do you want again to waste multiple assets to got after a guy who (even if he is a great player) won't be much more than a situational rusher for a couple of years.
Brockers could just as easily be Jonathan Sullivan as Richard Seymour. He is without doubt a project and could just as easily slip out of the first round and probably should. He's going to need at least a couple of years to mature. My god DBs out bench him...and at best at the end of his development he's more likely to be Ty Warren than Richard Seymour....and THAT's if you're lucky.
I'm all for trading up. I'm guessing only 4 draft picks make this team, so its fine with me. This is the year to do it. This is the year we should be trading up or out into 2013. HOWEVER if we are going to use those limited assets to move up, we should be doing it for players who are "sure things" at least as far as the draft goes. A player who is likely to have an immediate impact as a starter or in a rotation. NOT 2 players who are just as likely to be busts as hits....and even if they are hits, need time to develop. Remember you only can control these guys for 4 years. You don't want to be training guys who will play the best years of their career for ANOTHER team.
Last edited by patfanken; 04-11-2012 at 12:23 PM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
re: Trading Up (DL Melvin Ingram or Michael Brockers)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATippett56
I could possibly envision Michael Brockers falling into the 20s but not Melvin Ingram. It's a matter of draft capital to Bill Belichick, the price of moving up.
Its possible but not probable. He won't be there at 27. So we would have to trade up at least a few spots to get him. I see him going from 20-22, but possibly much higher.
Quote:
I would not get your hopes up for Melvin Ingram, since the New England Patriots passed up potential 3-4 outside linebackers in the 2011 NFL Draft even with the #33 overall selection.
We passed up on Brooks Reed, Jabaal Sheard, Justin Houstin, Sam Acho.
ALL of them had very good rookie seasons as 34 OLB.
We passed some of those guys for a Back up QB, 3rd down back, and an injury prone CB who sat out the whole season with an injury. It makes BB and the Front office look silly.
I'm not getting my hopes up since I think Ingram will go in the Top 10, but obviously BB wouldn't be wasting his time meeting with Ingram if there wasn't some interest.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
re: Trading Up (DL Melvin Ingram or Michael Brockers)
Quote:
Originally Posted by patfanken
I hope you aren't an accountant, because your numbers don't add up. Because if they did you would have to name me the 11 busts that came out of the 2nd round.....and you CAN'T because they don't exist. A lot of those 2nd rounders were used in trades for players and future picks (ie Wes Welker, Rob Gronkowski) But that's alright. Bernie Madoff thought your "accounting" was just fine
Learn how to interpret, smart ass.
15 picks in the 2nd and 3rd combined is obviously was what meant.
Since 2006, here are our 2nd and 3rd draft picks.....
2006
2nd - Chad Jackson - BUST
3rd - David Thomas - BUST
2009
2nd - Patrick Chung - good
2nd - Ron Brace - BUST
2nd - Darius Butler - BUST
2nd - Sebastion Vollmer - good
3rd - Brandon Tate - BUST
3rd - Tyrone McKenzie - BUST
2010
2nd - Rob Gronkowski - good
2nd - Jermaine Cunningham - BUST
2nd - Brandon Spikes - good
3rd - Taylor Price - BUST
Some might argue that David Thomas wasn't a bust, but he certainly was a bust on the Pats. We ended up trading him for a 7th round pick a couple years after he was drafted. And while Brandon Tate was somewhat decent, we eventually released him for nothing after only 2 seasons. He didn't even finish his rookie contract.
Do the math genius... That's 15 picks, and only 4 that turned out well.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
re: Trading Up (DL Melvin Ingram or Michael Brockers)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan
No, Sheard played 4-3 DE.
And Reed and Acho played in completely different 3-4 schemes. The only one who played in a similar scheme was Houston, and the Pats had 3 guys with more sacks than he did last season.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fake Nate Ebner
No big deal...only took me 3 defensive plays to be drafted before Tom Brady
re: Trading Up (DL Melvin Ingram or Michael Brockers)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrNathanDrake
We passed some of those guys for a Back up QB, 3rd down back, and an injury prone CB who sat out the whole season with an injury. It makes BB and the Front office look silly
The jury is not out on those players.
Mallett may turn into a stud or he may become trade bait, but I rather doubt anyone had expectations immediately after Mallett was drafted that he’d be doing anything other than holding a clipboard a year later so I don't why you're raising a fuss about that pick.
Regarding Vareen, people seem to assume he’s only a 3rd down back because he can catch the ball very well, if he couldn’t catch people would say he’s only a 1st and 2nd down back. He’s an every down back.
As far as Ras-I, he’s been injured but has also looked awesome when he did play, he might turn into a stud with the expectation that he’d redshirt a year.
I rather doubt BB gives a rats ass how he looks, he’s going to make the decisions he thinks are best. This doesn’t mean I always agree with his decisions but fully support his reasons for making them, caring about what people think of him are not among them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrNathanDrake
I'm not getting my hopes up since I think Ingram will go in the Top 10, but obviously BB wouldn't be wasting his time meeting with Ingram if there wasn't some interest.
The info BB gets might be used to qualify Ingram at a certain value, it may also be used if/when we ever go up against Ingram on another team. It can also be used in assessing their own evaluation process and skill.
As far as sending information, does the fact that BB has Ingram to Foxboro change Ingram’s market value? Would Tebow have still gone in the 1st round if we hadn’t brought him by twice? Might hosting a high profile player like Ingram overshadow BB hosting a lesser known player, making it less likely that the Foxboro visit increases the value of that sleeper player?
I really don’t think you can presume much from the fact that BB has someone over.
__________________
"The secret of steel has always carried with it a mystery, you must learn it's riddle, Conan, you must learn its discipline, for no one in this world can you trust, not men, not women, not beasts...this you can trust"
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by Snake Eyes; 04-11-2012 at 12:52 PM..
2009
2nd - Patrick Chung - good
2nd - Ron Brace - BUST
2nd - Darius Butler - BUST
2nd - Sebastion Vollmer - good
3rd - Brandon Tate - BUST
3rd - Tyrone McKenzie - BUST
2010
2nd - Rob Gronkowski - good
2nd - Jermaine Cunningham - BUST
2nd - Brandon Spikes - good
3rd - Taylor Price - BUST
Some might argue that David Thomas wasn't a bust, but he certainly was a bust on the Pats. We ended up trading him for a 7th round pick a couple years after he was drafted. And while Brandon Tate was somewhat decent, we eventually released him for nothing after only 2 seasons. He didn't even finish his rookie contract.
Do the math genius... That's 15 picks, and only 4 that turned out well.
Quote:
Learn how to interpret, smart ass.
Sorry, my friend, but I've got to call FAIL!! on this one!!
Next time, I suggest that you actually write what you supposedly meant ~ instead of editing it AFTER you've been busted on a false statement!! ~ rather than depending on others to put on their Schwami Hats and "learn how to interpret" your fact-retardant posts!! Just Sayin!!
__________________
Love HURTS!!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
It All Starts In The Trenches.
Run The Damned Ball.
Use The Whole Pig.
Develop & Deploy a Tenacious D!!
Drive the Enemy before you...and savor the Lamentations of their Women!!
re: Trading Up (DL Melvin Ingram or Michael Brockers)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Off The Grid
Sorry, my friend, but I've got to call FAIL!! on this one!!
Next time, I suggest that you actually write what you supposedly meant ~ instead of editing it AFTER you've been busted on a false statement!! ~ rather than depending on others to put on their Schwami Hats and "learn how to interpret" your fact-retardant posts!! Just Sayin!!
What are you talking about? I didn't edit anything there.
The fact is we've had 15 picks in the 2nd and 3rd rounds combined, and only 4 have turned out to be good players.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Bring on the 2012 Season
Last edited by MrNathanDrake; 04-11-2012 at 12:57 PM..
re: Trading Up (DL Melvin Ingram or Michael Brockers)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Off The Grid
Sorry, my friend, but I've got to call FAIL!! on this one!!
Next time, I suggest that you actually write what you supposedly meant ~ instead of editing it AFTER you've been busted on a false statement!! ~ rather than depending on others to put on their Schwami Hats and "learn how to interpret" your fact-retardant posts!! Just Sayin!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrNathanDrake
What are you talking about?
I didn't edit anything there.
Quote:
Today, 12:42 PM #8
MrNathanDrake
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
MrNathanDrake's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 624
Posting Frequency
Default Re: Trading Up (Melvin Ingram, Brockers)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATippett56 View Post
Unfortunately, Bill Belichick is not in the business of appeasing to posters on the PatsFans message board.
He's in the business of putting together the best team he can, and trading down into the 2nd round has NOT worked out.
Passing on Clay Mathews to accumulate picks and take 2nd rounders like Ron Brace and Darius freaking Butler did NOT make us a better team.
From 2006-2010 we have had 15 picks in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. Out of those 15 picks only 4 have turned out good. 11 have been BUSTS on our team. I am not counting last year since it's too early to tell still.
Quote:
I seriously doubt Bill Belichick will trade up in the first round of the 2012 NFL Draft unless he envisions value in Michael Brockers.
Like I said, he obviously wouldn't have had a projected Top 15 player like Melvin Ingram visiting Gilette if he wasn't considering trading up.
Even Brockers would most likely require trading up about 5-10 spots to pick.
BB wouldn't waste time and resources having these guys visit Gilette if he had no interest in trading up.