 |
Men's Apparel | Jerseys | Hats | Novelties | Throwback | Women's | Youth |
 |
| ||||||
| REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Mark Forums Read | Chat Room |
| WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM! |
| ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-05-2008, 07:49 AM
|
#11 | |
|
Moderatrix
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,322
|
Re: Why the jets WONT pick Gholston
Quote:
|
|
|
| FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
| DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM | ||
| RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP! | ||
|
|
04-05-2008, 08:06 AM
|
#12 |
|
In the Starting Line-up
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,145
|
Re: Why the jets WONT pick Gholston
The Jets had no pass rush at all last year, and it's not like Pace and Gholston wouldn't be able to play at the same time. Thomas they could always try to trade or just cut him or whatever. He blows. I can't imagine he would prevent the Jets from taking a potential star pass-rusher, especially on a team that has no pass rush.
The short answer is if the Jets think Gholston is the best value at #6 than that's who they will take. It will have nothing to do with Calvin Pace. |
|
|
|
04-05-2008, 01:03 PM
|
#13 |
|
In the Starting Line-up
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,408
My Mood:
|
Why the jets WILL pick Gholston
Can a team have too many edge rushers? Give me a break!
Their LDE--nine-year veteran Shaun Ellis--hasn't really panned out and his speed is declining. I figure they're going for Gholston unless the Arkansas RB or the BC QB is available at 6. Plus, they would love to give us the shaft. They'd positively gloat. Trade down and go for the second most explosive offensive player right out of the box: Michigan State big play receiver Devon Thomas. And collect some more picks where the real value is, second through fourth rounds. Go Pats! |
|
|
|
04-05-2008, 01:10 PM
|
#14 |
|
In the Starting Line-up
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stupid Illinois
Posts: 4,917
|
Re: Why the jets WONT pick Gholston
If the Jets picked McFadden, i would be very happy.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
04-05-2008, 01:56 PM
|
#15 | |
|
In the Starting Line-up
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Bedford, MA
Posts: 3,392
My Mood:
|
Re: Why the jets WONT pick Gholston
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
04-05-2008, 08:18 PM
|
#17 | |
|
Practice Squad
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 171
|
Re: Why the jets WONT pick Gholston
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
04-05-2008, 09:39 PM
|
#18 |
|
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: seward,ak
Posts: 891
|
Re: Why the jets WONT pick Gholston
f--k the jets....I am sure the Pats has plans for the rats
|
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 11:18 AM
|
#19 |
|
Practice Squad
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 228
My Mood:
|
Re: Why the jets WONT pick Gholston
You guys are obsessed with the Jets....
|
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 11:20 AM
|
#20 |
|
In the Starting Line-up
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stupid Illinois
Posts: 4,917
|
Re: Why the jets WONT pick Gholston
the Jets are idiots.
Stupid idiots.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.
|
