Patriots Gamble on Reed or Sheard Being There at 56 - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree2Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-30-2011, 10:39 AM   #11
All Pro Poster
 
VJCPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,640
Default Re: Patriots Gamble on Reed or Sheard Being There at 56

Quote:
Originally Posted by State View Post
According to Reiss, the Pats took Ras-I--sounds like a Jedi knight--at 33 with hopes that Brooks Reeds or Pittsburgh's Jabaal Sheard falling to 56.

Quick-hit thoughts from Day 2 - New England Patriots Blog - ESPN Boston

Seems like a silly gamble that was bound not to work if what Reiss says is true.

Any thoughts?
"But the Patriots instead selected cornerback Ras-I Dowling, a solid player and solid "character" guy who could form a dynamic long-term pairing with Devin McCourty if he stays healthy. It is my view that the Patriots were banking on either Sheard or Reed sliding through to 56."

That's just his opinion. It's based on his Presumption that the Pats were targeting those two players. The Pats passed on them at #33 and took Dowling instead. The Pats also made the Vereen pick with no hesitation. So it's quite possible the Pats weren't looking to target ANY linebacker in the picks between 33-56 range. They had ammunition to move up (In the form of extra 3rds and a 4th before the Raider trade) if they had really felt like it, which they obviously didn't.
__________________
Pats NEW LOOK Offense

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Weapons Galore!

Last edited by VJCPatriot; 04-30-2011 at 10:41 AM..
VJCPatriot is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-30-2011, 10:50 AM   #12
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,690
Default Re: Patriots Gamble on Reed or Sheard Being There at 56

Quote:
Originally Posted by FredFromDartmouth View Post
Yup they screwed up and they screwed up so badly they just gave up at the end last night and traded their remaining picks.

The Patriots got too cute with the trade downs. If they had taken Wilkerson or Heyward and then Ras-I ...it would have been a solid draft. Instead the Saints made them an ridiculous offer and BB seemingly can never refuse a juicy trade-down offer; I am sure he figured that Wilkerson or Heyward would be available at 33 just like McCourty lasted through two trade-downs.

Jimmy Johnson warned about being too cute with the trade downs; if your guy is there then you have to take him.
Great post.
DW Toys
DW Toys is offline  
Old 04-30-2011, 10:51 AM   #13
Rookie
 

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 23
Default Re: Patriots Gamble on Reed or Sheard Being There at 56

The math here is simple logic!

The pats could have gone and traded down with Cincy to 35 and picked up an extra pick, or another team even lower. The thought was that the Bills were going to select a QB at 34 and the team trading up would get first choice at the remaining ones.

But Buffalo diddnt pick a QB...BB must have figured that out when talking to them about the 33 pick.(when Buffalo wasnt interested in securing that 33 pick for a QB). Buffalo was going to take a DB and Bill valued Rowling better than any other DB, and took HIS GUY!

Does this make sense? If we dont choose Rowling at 33, Buffalo likely does, and we get an extra 6th round pick in a draft BB doesnt like, along with losing out on a player he wants, that now plays against us in our division!
BeauSox is offline  
Old 04-30-2011, 11:29 AM   #14
In the Starting Line-up
 
randomk1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,606
Default Re: Patriots Gamble on Reed or Sheard Being There at 56

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ochmed Jones View Post
I think this is Reiss's attempt at rationalization. Reiss needs to man up and admit, that when it comes to this particular position, BB is not going to:

A.) Draft a projections selection and
B.) Trust his coaching staff to properly develop a projection selection.
I hate the idea of us looking for this perfect "Patriots OLB". Is Cunningham the prototype? They have to be 6'3 260+ pounds,rush the passer,cover the pass,stop the run? At this point i'd be fine if we get a guy that can be just let loose and go after the QB and cause some havoc in the backfield.

Dumervil,Harrison neither have prototypical size for OLB yet they are among the best 3-4 OLB's in the league.
randomk1 is online now  
Old 04-30-2011, 11:47 AM   #15
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,887
Default Re: Patriots Gamble on Reed or Sheard Being There at 56

Quote:
Originally Posted by FredFromDartmouth View Post
Jimmy Johnson warned about being too cute with the trade downs; if your guy is there then you have to take him.
How do you know they didn't do exactly that (with Ras-I)?
Synovia is offline  
Old 04-30-2011, 12:00 PM   #16
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Sciz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,913
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Patriots Gamble on Reed or Sheard Being There at 56

Reiss is nothing short of delusional when it comes to the pass rush. He has no concept of the type of pass rusher than fits the Patriots' scheme. Love him as a reporter, but at least half of the posters here are more football smart than he is.
NEGoldenAge likes this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fake Nate Ebner
No big deal...only took me 3 defensive plays to be drafted before Tom Brady
Sciz is offline  
Old 04-30-2011, 12:07 PM   #17
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,110
Default Re: Patriots Gamble on Reed or Sheard Being There at 56

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ochmed Jones View Post
I think this is Reiss's attempt at rationalization. Reiss needs to man up and admit, that when it comes to this particular position, BB is not going to:

A.) Draft a projections selection and
B.) Trust his coaching staff to properly develop a projection selection.
With no genuine need at D-line and your correct assessment of BB's unwillingness in most cases to spend two or three years grooming an OLB candidate, he addressed the older Offense, and initiated a comprehensive rebuild.

BB has batted 5 for 7 in acquiring OLBs via veteran FA, who can help immediately. He succeeded with Pfifer, Vrabel and Colvin. He had partial success with AD Thomas and TBC and Ninkovitch is an INComplete. BB failed with Carpenter and Burrow, who were both about done when he got them.

Last edited by AzPatsFan; 04-30-2011 at 12:08 PM..
AzPatsFan is offline  
Old 04-30-2011, 12:27 PM   #18
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,141
Blog Entries: 4
Default Re: Patriots Gamble on Reed or Sheard Being There at 56

Quote:
Originally Posted by AzPatsFan View Post
With no genuine need at D-line and your correct assessment of BB's unwillingness in most cases to spend two or three years grooming an OLB candidate, he addressed the older Offense, and initiated a comprehensive rebuild.
Agreed.

Personally, I like the vote of confidence by Belichick for his defensive line and have high hopes for the younger guys like Darryl Richard, Brandon Deadericks and Myron Pryor. With Ron Brace, I'm losing faith but I remain hopeful.
__________________
"It's not whether you get knocked down; it's whether you get up."Vince Lombardi


Pats fan since 1993
TealSox is offline  
Old 04-30-2011, 01:10 PM   #19
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: On Buzzards Bay. I can hear the surf after a storm
Posts: 1,822
My Mood: Cheeky
Default Re: Patriots Gamble on Reed or Sheard Being There at 56

Quote:
Originally Posted by Synovia View Post
How do you know they didn't do exactly that (with Ras-I)?
I don't of course. Just an educated guess. I think that they figured that either Heyward or Wilkerson would fall to 33. They should have taken one of them at 28 but they gambled and ended up at 33 with no pass rusher worthy of the pick. They even hesitated on Ras-I but I suspect that they did not want to be burned again.

Hopefully they have learned their lesson and draft their guy if he is there although it is too late this year.

Can you imagine if they drafted Heyward/Wilkerson at 28 like they should have and got Ras-I at 33? That would have made this a great draft. Instead it became the most disappointing draft day I have seen long while....

Last edited by FredFromDartmouth; 04-30-2011 at 01:12 PM..
FredFromDartmouth is offline  
Old 04-30-2011, 01:13 PM   #20
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,887
Default Re: Patriots Gamble on Reed or Sheard Being There at 56

Quote:
Originally Posted by FredFromDartmouth View Post
Can you imagine if they drafted Heyward/Wilkerson at 28 like they should have and got Ras-I at 33? That would have made this a great draft. Instead it became the most disappointing draft day I have seen long while....
Assuming that Heyward or Wilkinson turns out fine. There's a good chance that Dowling is a better player than either, and its almost a certainty that the Saints pick next year WILL BE.
Synovia is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Day 2 = Sheard JSn Patriots Draft Talk 33 04-29-2011 06:13 PM
Jabaal Sheard stinkypete Patriots Draft Talk 45 03-30-2011 11:52 PM
Jabaal Sheard tricktak Patriots Draft Talk 1 03-13-2011 02:01 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC