onegr8om

In my opinion, Clay Matthews made the play of the superbowl. With the Steelers driving(and with momentum) his forced fumble and great athletic move to get into position seemed to be the momentum shift the Packers HAD to have in that situation. There's a lot of talk about the Pats having specific size needs in their linebackers and how Matthews didn't fit into that requirement, but after seeing that particular play i'm convinced that a FOOTBALL player can work in ANY system, regardless of size. Honestly, had he been the Pats ideal SIZE for a LB would he have been able to scrunch himself down and shed the block like that? I doubt it. Love the play, the move and the way he finished the tackle. THAT is the kind of LB we need!!

Shelterdog

1.) Matthews now has has the Patriots OLB ideal size-he's 6'3 or 6'4" and 255 or so. Matthews has put on 15-20 pounds of muscle since the draft.-he was 240 at the combine just before his 23 birthday after 5 years of a college strength program and he's suddenly blown up to 255 or 260 or less than two calendar years.

It's insane growth (he was a little shorter and 165 in high school).

It's roid or just freakish late growth.

2.) We did trade the Matthews pick for Gronk, Tate, Butler and Edelman.

Sciz

I think you should have watched him for the rest of the game. He spent a lot of it being dominated by a backup TE.

onegr8om

I'm not saying i think we should have taken Matthews OVER what we got in return(i LOVE the return for that trade), but i just dont think we should avoid players because of specific size concerns. Matthews just happens to be a great example of a player who wasn't ideal size on draft day, but matured into a GREAT Player. We're not very far off from being able to become a GREAT defense, but a rush LB/DE certainly fits the bill regardless if he's not "ideal" size.

WhiZa

This is also what i'm thinking about this upcoming draft. I hope BB throws away his selection criteria and drafts some playmakers. Guys that change the tone of the game and take the heat off Brady so it won't hurt if he throws a couple more ints next year. Which you already have to assume he won't break the record again.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- 4 years =
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

WhiZa

I didn't know that until you mentioned it. Here's his combine numbers:
6-3.1 240 4.6/40
Clay Matthews*|*Southern Cal,*OLB*:*2009 NFL Draft Scout Player Profile

And today he's 6-3 255: Clay Matthews, OLB for the Green Bay Packers at NFL.com

It's tough to put on that much weight and still be as effective as he is. Someone saw that he could handle it and it's paid off for GB. Makes you wonder if Matthews was 255 at the draft where he would of gotten selected.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- 4 years =
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Armchair Quarterback

For all the talk of height/weight requirements of the Pats for their OLB.


Rob Ninkovich 6'2 255
TBC 6'2 250
M.Murrell 6'2 250

Cunningham 6'3 266

Moore (DE) 6'4 268

Shelterdog

If I could pick one pro athlete who I thought was juicing it would be Matthews. He was 6-1, 165 as a 16 year old junior in high school, it's not clear what he was as a senior in high school, about 190 as a freshman at USC, 6-3 225 as a 19 year old redshirt freshman, 230 as a sophomore, 230 as a 21 year old junior, 246 as a 22 year old senior, down to 240 at the combine, 250 as a rookie and 255-260 now.

The growth from 230 - 260 is really, really suspicious-he'd bulked up 35 pounds in a year and 60 pounds of great weight over three years which is already a lot, then stayed at 225-230 for a few years, then jumped up another 20 pounds of good weight from his junior to his rookie year, then another 5-10 pounds in another year..

reamer

I suppose you're excited about the play (which was only halfway his play; I believe Pickett made the hit), but the Packers aren't even in that position if Matthews had a clue about setting the edge or keeping contain. The Steelers TE obliterated him in the run game. I lost track of how many times they ran right over that edge and picked up a key first down. The game would have been a blowout with a better run-stopper at OLB. It's that simple.

Look, Matthews and his ilk have a place in this league. It's just not with the Patriots, at least not unless they learn better technique against the run. Love him as a blitzing threat, but he did precious little in that game until he combined with the lineman for that hit. Let's not get away from what's worked for us so well for so long just because of one decent play from a good player who doesn't fit our philosophy.

patchick

The idea that the Patriots rejected Matthews based solely on rigid size requirements is a popular one here, but where does it come from? Why should we suppose that the Patriots would have drafted him in the first round if he'd been 255 lbs.?

Remember that Matthews was NOT an impact player in college. He made 10 starts and recorded 5 sacks in 4 years at USC. Nobody was talking about him as a high pick until he showed up at the Combine looking like Superman, having gone from scrawny to brawny very, very fast.

What about that screams "Belichick first rounder" to you? When has BB ever spent a first on a guy who only started for one year?