Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Those look like they could be five quality starters one day. Would Miami trade with us? Million dollar question. If both Parcells and Belichick thought they could benefit from it, they would. Two guys who don't care about the rules, only what they think is best for their team. If Parcells did this, he'd have to trade the number one pick backwards as well to add more picks. That would be the tough part.
Probably couldn't happen, but it would be nice to see.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Those look like they could be five quality starters one day. Would Miami trade with us? Million dollar question. If both Parcells and Belichick thought they could benefit from it, they would. Two guys who don't care about the rules, only what they think is best for their team. If Parcells did this, he'd have to trade the number one pick backwards as well to add more picks. That would be the tough part.
Probably couldn't happen, but it would be nice to see.
I don't want to trade down that far. I don't think we need extra picks. We need 2-3 good def. players. I'm in agreement with the thread that says let's get our 1, higher 2 and oakland's 3 and go home. We might be able to get our pass-rusher, cb and ilb if we do it that way. Gamble on a rb and ol in rounds 4 and 5 or 5 and 6.
I don't want to trade down that far. I don't think we need extra picks. We need 2-3 good def. players. I'm in agreement with the thread that says let's get our 1, higher 2 and oakland's 3 and go home. We might be able to get our pass-rusher, cb and ilb if we do it that way. Gamble on a rb and ol in rounds 4 and 5 or 5 and 6.
I liked that too - it's just that I'm not enamoured with the talent at the top of the draft and am really beginning to like the talent from the back half of the first round to the middle of the third.
Atlanta is another team we could strike a similar deal with to give us five picks from 32 to 69. I'd like to get two CBs and two ILBs. We can use our own third and/or fourth to improve the picks (sneak back into the first round) if need be.
Tell me Atlanta wouldn't love to add McFadden and Ryan/Brohm in the first round.
I liked that too - it's just that I'm not enamoured with the talent at the top of the draft and am really beginning to like the talent from the back half of the first round to the middle of the third.
Atlanta is another team we could strike a similar deal with to give us five picks from 32 to 69. I'd like to get two CBs and two ILBs. We can use our own third and/or fourth to improve the picks (sneak back into the first round) if need be.
Tell me Atlanta wouldn't love to add McFadden and Ryan/Brohm in the first round.
That would be a PR dream for them. How bout 7 for their 2nd this year and 1st next year? Then we have our 2nd favorite in-season activity next year. Rooting against a team so we get a higher draft pick.
I don't want to trade down that far. I don't think we need extra picks. We need 2-3 good def. players. I'm in agreement with the thread that says let's get our 1, higher 2 and oakland's 3 and go home. We might be able to get our pass-rusher, cb and ilb if we do it that way. Gamble on a rb and ol in rounds 4 and 5 or 5 and 6.
it's true that we need 2-3 good players but with top picks don't forget you are paying for potential that may not work out. I'd rather trade down for value unless we feel there is a high reward/low risk prospect at the # 7 spot. I feel it's better to spend the money on a free agent who has proven themselves already. Otherwise, we lose alot of money on a potential bust. With multiple lower picks the odds are in your favor of picking up at least one or two good ones and less penalty if you miss on the picks although I trust in BB, Pioli and Co. since they have done well picking high with Seymour, Warren, etc. The other argument may be that the free agent market for LBs and CBs may not be that great this year so it's something that BB/Pioli has to consider too.
it's true that we need 2-3 good players but with top picks don't forget you are paying for potential that may not work out. I'd rather trade down for value unless we feel there is a high reward/low risk prospect at the # 7 spot. I feel it's better to spend the money on a free agent who has proven themselves already. Otherwise, we lose alot of money on a potential bust. With multiple lower picks the odds are in your favor of picking up at least one or two good ones and less penalty if you miss on the picks although I trust in BB, Pioli and Co. since they have done well picking high with Seymour, Warren, etc. The other argument may be that the free agent market for LBs and CBs may not be that great this year so it's something that BB/Pioli has to consider too.
Another thing to factor in this free-agent season is that a lot of teams are well under the cap. The only guys we will probably be able to get are vets who want a shot at the ring. A guy like Seau. Doubt we can afford someone like A.Thomas this year. Or, even keep A.Samuel for that matter.
I would love to see New England trade back for multiple mid round picks this year, second to third round.
They can resign Moss, Extend Samuel, Work on Big Vince's new deal, Keep Mankins happy.
Then Draft linebackers and Db's and i'd be incredibly happy with that scenario.
__________________
That trophy represents the team – I mean that word collectively, that is able to play the best season for the year that it's engraved. It doesn't mean anything about what happened the year before. It doesn't say what's the best team, which has the most talented players, which teams has the biggest payroll, smallest payroll. It stands for the team that played the best in that season. Put the number on there for that year. And the next year we start all over again everybody is at the same point."
I to want to trade down and get quality youth on Defense. I think the most likely bet would be either the Panthers, Bears, or Lions trading up for the 7th pick if they want a QB, assuming one is taken by Atlanta, and they feel Baltimore will grab the next best one at number 8. That trade would put us in the 13-15 range and possibly a second of some scenario.....We could save money, get a good LB/DB first and go from there.
That would be a PR dream for them. How bout 7 for their 2nd this year and 1st next year? Then we have our 2nd favorite in-season activity next year. Rooting against a team so we get a higher draft pick.