Need positions for the draft, Patriots style - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-23-2007, 06:51 AM   #1
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Fencer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,396
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Need positions for the draft, Patriots style

1. DB. 4 of the Patriots top 8 DBs will be FAs after 2007, assuming Asante is locked up long-term. Otherwise it's 5. 1-2 of the others (Harrison, maybe Sanders) are short-termers. There's plenty of opportunity to upgrade.

2. LB. The only youth-and-speed at LB is Thomas and the developmental players, and all the latter could be upgraded. Colvin's toughness is a little disappointing, and he could be gone in a couple of years. The only proven LBs who will obviously be here for more than two years are Thomas and Vrabel, and there has to be a little doubt even about Vrabel.

3. DL. It's not known whether Warren will be resigned. Green and Wright may need to be replaced soon too, as they eventually leave for starting jobs. There's a definite upgrade opportunity at backup NT, as Wilfork can't go the whole game. And if there ever really were an excess at NT, Wilfork could probably take a few reps outside anyway.

4. OT. Light's the only completely proven one, and all the top guys are a bit fragile.

I don't know how to rank RB, P, etc. after that.

This analysis is meant to be independent of considerations like "Well, chances are we won't get the needs for NT or OT met in this weak draft at those positions unless we happen to get lucky," whether or not that's actually an accurate assessment of the draft pool.
Fencer is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 03-23-2007, 09:34 AM   #2
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,800
Blog Entries: 14
Default Re: Need positions for the draft, Patriots style

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
1. DB. 4 of the Patriots top 8 DBs will be FAs after 2007, assuming Asante is locked up long-term. Otherwise it's 5. 1-2 of the others (Harrison, maybe Sanders) are short-termers. There's plenty of opportunity to upgrade.

2. LB. The only youth-and-speed at LB is Thomas and the developmental players, and all the latter could be upgraded. Colvin's toughness is a little disappointing, and he could be gone in a couple of years. The only proven LBs who will obviously be here for more than two years are Thomas and Vrabel, and there has to be a little doubt even about Vrabel.

3. DL. It's not known whether Warren will be resigned. Green and Wright may need to be replaced soon too, as they eventually leave for starting jobs. There's a definite upgrade opportunity at backup NT, as Wilfork can't go the whole game. And if there ever really were an excess at NT, Wilfork could probably take a few reps outside anyway.

4. OT. Light's the only completely proven one, and all the top guys are a bit fragile.

I don't know how to rank RB, P, etc. after that.

This analysis is meant to be independent of considerations like "Well, chances are we won't get the needs for NT or OT met in this weak draft at those positions unless we happen to get lucky," whether or not that's actually an accurate assessment of the draft pool.
I see DB and LB as the real biggies..and the DL / OL as much lower. I think with Hill a make it or gone year for him..there is a clear spot for a player.
DB---LB---then a gap...
Pats726 is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 10:12 AM   #3
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,688
My Mood: Sad
Default Re: Need positions for the draft, Patriots style

I would spilt up DB (FS, SS, and CB) same with LB (ILB versus OLB). It also depends if you focus on 2007 or are looking at 2008+

Tried to balance short-term improvement (2007) with long-term stability and depth (2-3 years). Needs only matter if two players are available who are equally rated. Every unit on the team could be improved so take it all with a grain of salt.

All things being equal (which they never) my rankings are:
1) CB - Hobbs is only CB signed beyond 2007 (of course this changes if Samuel is extended)
2) ILB - Bruschi is slowing, Vrabel is more natural at OLB, Alexander is only a situational starter. IMO this is the only position on the team missing a starter and with the depth of the defense a full time start is not required, just someone who can take 15-20 snaps per game in a rotation.
3) FS - Wilson is a question mark, unit returns top 2 starters (Wilson, Hawkins) but could use a playmaker.
4) WR - Very solid for this season but only Jackson and Welker are under firm control beyond 2007.
5) SS - Health concerns for Rodney but at least for 2007 the units returns the top starters and adequate backups reserves (Harrison, Sanders, Mitchell) with top 2 signed until 2008 or beyond.
6) OLB - possibly some youth
7) OL - never have enough O lineman
8) DL - never have enough D lineman
9) RB - another specialist would be nice (either short yardage or 3rd down speed back who can be split out as a WR)
10) TE - solid, maybe a practice squad player reserve type
11) QB - requisite 45 yeard old backup


--------------------------------------------------------------
Reiss had them listed like this before FA
1/ LB
2/ CB
3/ WR
4/ S
5/ RB
6/ P
7/TE's
8/ OL
9/ DL
cstjohn17 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC