BelichickFan

Assuming they cost $20M and $10M a year what do you do ?

While this is a very deep QB year and we could trade up with two #2s for an interesting long term QB, I'm not going there. But it's viable to trade our two extra #2s for, say, Colt McCoy and trade Brady after next year.

Myself, I would re-sign Brady and let Moss play it out. Draft Golden Tate as he should know the concept of our offense already. Hope Brandon Tate comes through and in 2011 have Brady with Welker and Tate ^ 2.

BelichickFan

BTW, after I draft Tate then it all OL and defensive front seven in the draft for me with our three #2s.

PATSYLICIOUS

Brady is a Patriot for life IMO. Even if he continues to have 2nd halves like today it's hard to see him finishing his career elsewhere.

Moss I'm not so sure about. Love having him around but I think I'd rather see the $$ put into the defense.

OldNEPatsFan

Moss clearly isn't worth the money he is being paid.

mcgraw_wv

Brady is allowed to have a bad year. He has at least 5 GOOD years in him. I like Moss, but I don't think he brings anything special to the offense. I much rather have 3 unknown hard working WRs fighting and scraping for every yard.

I am frustrated that in 07, we relied on a LB for redzone scoring from the TE position, however this year we can't get the littlest of production from full time professional TEs?

If Watson isn't going to be used in the Passing game, why did we keep him over Graham?

I feel Moss is being used as a one trick pony WR, and our team is weaker when we try to throw is deep once a drive. It shows weakness to go deep so often. It shows they aren't looking to ball for a drive, they just want to score quick and get off the field. I would like to see next game a game plan of no passes longer than 30 yards in the air even if they are wide open.

Force them to gut it out, and play physical. I have also noticed, and said in 07, the change in offense made this team weak, and it still shows.

BelichickFan

Also - I assumed we'd get about two #1s for Brady and only about a #3 for Moss.

LetsGoPats36

Trading Brady is not a good idea.

Laurence Maroney's Dreads

I really don't understand the Moss haters on this board. 68 catches, 1,058 yards and 9 touchdowns through 12 games doesn't do it for you anymore?

__________________
"It is better to be prepared and never have the opportunity than to have the opportunity and not be prepared." - Ted Marchibroda to Bill Belichick

KontradictioN

Yeah, he only has a 1,000 yard season in Week 13. Let's cut him!

Personally, I think Moss is gone after 2010. Tate seems like an interesting option, given where we will probably be picking, but I would rather have a bigger receiver in the mold of a Julio Jones or an A.J. Green. Brady is definitely staying after 2010.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian

Bill B.

Keep Brady, of course. That is a no-brainer. I think he is still dealing with issues from being out a year. I would like to keep Moss, but after next 2010, I don't think he will be a number one receiver at that time. If he would take less money, I would like to keep him and have him be a number 2 or 3 receiver. The thing is, without Moss drawing double coverage, would Welker be as successful as he has been.