My Blueprint For the Pats - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree190Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2012, 11:44 AM   #21
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,671
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Eyes View Post
I rarely get excited about college QBs but I do find myself excited about McCarron, and strangely enough it’s his lack of flashiness and very sound fundamentals that impresses me the most. He seems to play without any ego whatsoever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
Agreed. And I'm hoping that that very "lack of flashiness" keeps his draft stock down a bit, at least to the late 1st round.
I've already said that I'm happy taking McCarron in the first (the Aaron Rodgers thing) so I am a fan, however, I do have one concern and that is his Redzone passing. It's not something I've charted or studied but my impression watching Alabama the last couple of years is that they do come away with a lot of FGs, especially against the better defenses.
manxman2601 is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 10-27-2012, 07:22 AM   #22
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
mayoclinic's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Mackenzie has brought up an intriguing TE prospect who could be a nice alternative to Chris Gragg in my "bliueprint" and mock: Cincinnati TE Travis Kelce, brother of Phialdelphia center Jason Kelce:



Interesting kid:

- 3 sport background (baseball, basketball); love TEs with basketball backgrounds
- Former QB, so he should have some grasp of offensive schemes and "processing speed". Plus he's been used in Wildcat situations some, which also speaks to his movement skills.

Here's a nice read on Kelce:

http://cdn3.sbnation.com/photo_image...xtra_large.jpg

I had SMU DE converted to TE Taylor Thompson on my wish list and mock last year for the Pats, who had similar size and athleticism. Taylor ended up going at #145 in the 5th round to Tennessee, so that range wouldn't be unreasonable for Kelce.

I'd be torn right now between Kelce and Gragg. We need another H-back/move TE to back up and complement Aaron Hernandez more than we need another big TE. But if Kelce really moves as well in space as Mackenzie suggests, the chance to get a big guy with Gronk-like movement skills could be too good to pass up.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
mayoclinic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 10:59 AM   #23
In the Starting Line-up
 
Snake Eyes's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,373
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
Mackenzie has brought up an intriguing TE prospect who could be a nice alternative to Chris Gragg in my "bliueprint" and mock: Cincinnati TE Travis Kelce, brother of Phialdelphia center Jason Kelce:



Interesting kid:

- 3 sport background (baseball, basketball); love TEs with basketball backgrounds
- Former QB, so he should have some grasp of offensive schemes and "processing speed". Plus he's been used in Wildcat situations some, which also speaks to his movement skills.

Here's a nice read on Kelce:

http://cdn3.sbnation.com/photo_image...xtra_large.jpg

I had SMU DE converted to TE Taylor Thompson on my wish list and mock last year for the Pats, who had similar size and athleticism. Taylor ended up going at #145 in the 5th round to Tennessee, so that range wouldn't be unreasonable for Kelce.

I'd be torn right now between Kelce and Gragg. We need another H-back/move TE to back up and complement Aaron Hernandez more than we need another big TE. But if Kelce really moves as well in space as Mackenzie suggests, the chance to get a big guy with Gronk-like movement skills could be too good to pass up.
How about both? If Vereen comes online he'd likely be an upgrade over Woodhead, freeing up a spot for Gragg as a FB/TE.
__________________
"The secret of steel has always carried with it a mystery, you must learn it's riddle, Conan, you must learn its discipline, for no one in this world can you trust, not men, not women, not beasts...this you can trust"


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Snake Eyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 01:24 PM   #24
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Merril Hoge's Tie Knot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 761
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
I would prefer to trade Chung for Talib in my scenario, but it's quite possible that Tampa wouldn't be interested, especially as they have Mark Barron. Maybe they'd see Chung as a worthwhile backup. I think I specified a 2014 4th as an alternative, which is roughly equivalent to a 2013 5th round pick.
I didn't notice the 2014 part.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
One of my reasons for preferring to move McCourty to safety is that he plays better in zone and with the ball in front of him than in man/press coverage, whereas Dennard and Dowling play better in man/press. It doesn't make sense to "mix and match" CBs with different stylistic strengths. If McCourty is developing his man coverage skills that might be different. As for signing UFA safeties, I'd grab either Gholston or Byrd in a heartbeat, but I'm assuming both will be franchised or extended (Gholston was franchised last year and almost certainly will this year, and I can't see Buffalo letting Byrd get away to a division foe). Reed's already been discussed in detail. Don't see that happening. DRC isn't my ideal Pats CB, but he'd be a big improvement over Kyle Arrington. I think Talib has the best skill set of the bunch, but obviously there are issues and risks involved. He's only 26. I think it's worth the risk if he can be had reasonably cheaply, but that's JMHO, and it's only because we're desperate.
Like I said I'd let the market dictate which DB I'd go after. Basically I'd go after the best available. Whether that's Goldson, Byrd, DRC, Will Middleton or Ed Reed. That's not to say I think they will all be available. That's a luxury McCourty's versatility allows. He's been adored by PFF this year, (top 5 I think) so it's not just me that feels he improved.

Reed my have been discussed in detail, but not by me. I'll be shocked if he doesn't become a FA. Baltimore has paralyzing cap problems and they have a history of letting their stars test the FA market. They let Lewis do it twice for example.
Merril Hoge's Tie Knot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 03:20 PM   #25
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,459
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Nice work on this. Although the Chung for Talib trade doesn't make sense. Chung's contract is expiring this year as is Talib's.
VrabelJr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 12:49 AM   #26
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,578
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Quote:
Originally Posted by VrabelJr View Post
Nice work on this. Although the Chung for Talib trade doesn't make sense. Chung's contract is expiring this year as is Talib's.
Not the OP, but I believe that's sort of the point: you trade Chung for Talib before the deadline, and then, if Talib pans out, you resign him before FA starts.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 08:55 PM   #27
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Off The Grid's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,920
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

An Exquisite Work of Art, my Friend.

You continue to amaze and, indeed, to astonish me.

If The Pravda's Sport Section was a fifth as good as your Writing ~ ah, how I miss the Hall of Fame lineup of Peter Gammons, Bob Ryan, Nick Cafardo, and Crew ~ then I would actually stifle my laughter and pay those fools.

Brother Mayo's Priorities

1 ~ Fixing The Secondary ~ I am actually more sanguine about our Secondary than...everybody. I think that Devin McCourty, Alfonzo Dennard, Tavon Wilson, Nate Ebner...and even the much maligned Kyle Arrington provide us a talented Core 5...and Marquise Cole has been surprising me.

You know I was never thrilled about Steven Gregory or Ras I Dowling, but the former, at least, offers us decent Depth, for the time being.

Dowling is suggestive of a complete and utter waste of an invaluable Pick. I was disgusted at the move at the time, and tried really hard to get behind it...But we should've made a deal with the Miners, and I'm afraid my anti-Dowling bias is well on the way to being validated...

Pat Chung, on the other hand, I was very excited about when we drafted'm...But as you know I have sold my last remaining Shares in that fellow, and am 100% with you in coveting his departure...

Even so, I still believe in those 5, and believe we can be ~ and ought to be ~ selective in who we Draft in the Draft or sign in Free Agency.

I've never been one to spend heavily, here: First off ~ this is for everyone else, as you know my Philosophy well, Brother Mayo ~ I greatly undervalue the Secondary, because of my Core Philosophy that it is wise to spend disproportionately heavily in the Trenches, and lightly away from them...

And also because there're always intriguing Day 2, Day 3, and UFA guys that I like. And regarding Free Agency, I'd spend only on Bargain Vets, and rarely ~ if ever ~ spend Big Money.

2 ~ Left Defensive End ~ I also find myself relatively sanguine about Left Defensive End. I am, as you doubtlessly recall, frothing with what I personally see as the Potential of Jermaine Cunningham ~ Woot!! ~ and Jake Bequette, as well as Justin Francis and, indeed, Rob Ninkovich, Travis Scott, and even Donta HighTower, on occasion. Cunningham and Bequette, in particular, I see as possessing immense long term potential. Mind you: You know that it is a Core Philosophy of mine that you can never have too much FirePower...And if the right guy is available at the right price...

3 ~ Youth/Depth at O Line ~ Couldn't agree more, as of course you know, Bro. The Missed Opportunities to cheaply enrich our Depth of Talent in our interior O Line, the last 2 years, have sickened me...Which is not to say that Mad Bill has been anything short of Light Years ahead of his Rivals...And it is fortunate that O Guards, in particular, continue to be unfathomably undervalued.

4 ~ Speed at Wide Receiver ~ Hmmm...Yes, here's where we currently diverge, somewhat. Perhaps to a fault am I focused on Moving The Chains. If I was running a BaseBall team, all I'd want swinging the bats is Contact Hitters with elevated On Base Percentages...I wouldn't give a rat's @$$ about Home Runs. But that, as they say, is me...And I look forward to your deliciously & delightfully Disruptive Discourses on this Great Subject of yours: The Oregonization of the Offense.

5 ~ Depth and Future at Defensive Tackle ~ I am, needless to say, 1000% behind you on the importance of developing High Caliber Depth of Talent at this insanely crucial Position.

6 ~ Wing Back & Flex End ~ Heh. I think you know how I feel about that position. It is the most potentially Disruptive position in the entire Offense...and to fail to develop High Caliber Depth of Talent behind Aaron the Navigator...is incredibly foolish. Fortunately, Mad Bill happens to be brilliant...and may well soon address this Opportunity.

7 ~ Tom Brady's Successor ~ I see no need to rush on this, or to spend more than Day 3 or UFA Draft Capital...but I certainly heartily agree that it's always a good idea to develop Talent, here. We all know who I would've scooped up, the last couple years: Greg McElroy, Kellen Moore, and maybe Ricky Stanzi...Fortunately, there are likely to be more such Field Generals, and indeed they are likely to come just as inexplicably cheaply, Praise The Gods.
captain stone and mayoclinic like this.
__________________
Love HURTS!!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

It All Starts In The Trenches.

Run The Damned Ball.

Use The Whole Pig.

Develop & Deploy a Tenacious D!!

Drive the Enemy before you...and savor the Lamentations of their Women!!

Count the Rings.

Rinse & Repeat.

Off The Grid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 09:25 PM   #28
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Avenger's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,095
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Kellen Moore would be great in this offense, his football acumen is top notch. With the receivers on this team Moore would be able to play to his strengths, he goes through his reads quicker than any QB I've ever scouted.

I still think that safety is the biggest need in the draft, and I would like to pick up a nickelback. If Tyrann Mathieu enters the draft I would be more than fine with taking him with our 7th round pick.
Off The Grid likes this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Avenger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 11:10 PM   #29
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Avenger's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,095
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

I don't think that Moore fits Detroit's game, the Lion's offense relies on getting it deep to Johnson.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Avenger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2012, 03:28 PM   #30
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 77
My Mood: Cynical
Default Re: My Blueprint For the Pats

Well there was the first piece in the master plan ? Finally a corner ( i hope ) ?
Luxusdk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pats layed the blueprint for the Steelers? DisgruntledTunaFan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 2 12-22-2007 12:31 AM
Ravens have the true blueprint to beat the Pats AndyJohnson PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 7 12-04-2007 08:18 PM
Blueprint to Beat the Pats JR4 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 5 12-04-2007 10:12 AM
I guess the Pats now have the blueprint... Patradomous PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 9 11-27-2007 12:03 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC