The Pats did not "reach" for Mayo or Wheatley - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2008, 11:10 PM   #1
In the Starting Line-up
 
PonyExpress's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ManchVegas!!
Posts: 4,646
Default The Pats did not "reach" for Mayo or Wheatley

The three best, and most accurate current NFL draft analysts (IMO) are Gosselin, Nawrocki and Mayock.

In their pre draft top 100 rankings, Mayock had Mayo at #8, Nawricki at #15 and Gosselin at #19. That averages out to #14. Mayo was a "fast riser" as the draft approached. The Pats took him at #10, which is where they had to take him to ensure they could get him ahead of Denver at #12, which was looking for an Al Wilson clone, and Detroit at #15.

As for Wheatley, in their predraft rankings Mayock had him at #64, Nawrocki at #80 and Gosselin at #96. That averages out to #80. He was also a fast riser as the draft approached. The Pats took him at #62, ahead of several teams who likely coveted him.

Mayo and Wheatley are not only quality players, but IMO represented solid value for their draft slots.

Last edited by PonyExpress; 04-26-2008 at 11:10 PM..
PonyExpress is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-26-2008, 11:16 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,623
Default Re: The Pats did not "reach" for Mayo or Wheatley

I would add that Mayock is the only one of the three analysts to play DB in the NFL (or probably at any level), and played under BB to boot.
letekro is offline  
Old 04-26-2008, 11:36 PM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
PATRIOT64's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northeastern PA
Posts: 3,775
Default Re: The Pats did not "reach" for Mayo or Wheatley

Quote:
Originally Posted by PonyExpress View Post
The three best, and most accurate current NFL draft analysts (IMO) are Gosselin, Nawrocki and Mayock.

In their pre draft top 100 rankings, Mayock had Mayo at #8, Nawricki at #15 and Gosselin at #19. That averages out to #14. Mayo was a "fast riser" as the draft approached. The Pats took him at #10, which is where they had to take him to ensure they could get him ahead of Denver at #12, which was looking for an Al Wilson clone, and Detroit at #15.

As for Wheatley, in their predraft rankings Mayock had him at #64, Nawrocki at #80 and Gosselin at #96. That averages out to #80. He was also a fast riser as the draft approached. The Pats took him at #62, ahead of several teams who likely coveted him.

Mayo and Wheatley are not only quality players, but IMO represented solid value for their draft slots.
I think Mayo was a decent choice but can't agree that Wheately is not a reach,IMO there are several better athletes than Wheately still on the board and Wheately should have been no earlier than mid/late 3rd but it was a typical BB wild pick so we will see how it pans out.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
PATRIOT64 is offline  
Old 04-26-2008, 11:44 PM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,623
Default Re: The Pats did not "reach" for Mayo or Wheatley

Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOT64 View Post
I think Mayo was a decent choice but can't agree that Wheately is not a reach,IMO there are several better athletes than Wheately still on the board and Wheately should have been no earlier than mid/late 3rd but it was a typical BB wild pick so we will see how it pans out.
Not to say your opinion in this matter is meaningless, but it's meaningless. I mean how much game film of college cornerbacks have you watched this year? Mayock's comments and the write-up of him at NFL.com has everything that you would want in a corner except height: elite speed, change of direction, ball skills, confidence, and smarts.
letekro is offline  
Old 04-26-2008, 11:56 PM   #5
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,320
Default Re: The Pats did not "reach" for Mayo or Wheatley

The Pats pretty clearly viewed Mayo as a rare player, and he legitimately could have gone as early as 11.

As for Wheatley, who knows? He was one of those players who I would read about and wonder "where's the catch"? Why ranked so low? The writeups on his skills are drool-worthy, and his measurables are tremendous. Yes he's small, but so were higher-rated CBs like Flowers and Porter. So I concluded that the injury was the problem, and likely a serious one. If his health really isn't an issue, he's a fine pick at 62 -- especially taking into account that he was probably the single best KR left in the draft.
patchick is offline  
Old 04-26-2008, 11:57 PM   #6
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 295
Default Re: The Pats did not "reach" for Mayo or Wheatley

I think both were very slight reaches, but here's the thing:

With Mayo, before and after he was picked, hell the general theme of the first round, was Oline and front seven on D. Mayo was the best person defensive player left on the board after Cinci took Rivers, so while it MAY have been a slight reach, the Pats couldn't exactly afford to find out if Denver, Detroit, or one of the other teams right past them that has trouble on D would have taken him.

For Wheatley, the end of the first round and 2nd round were loaded with CB's coming off the board. Maybe the Pats could have waited another 7 picks. Maybe not. The apparently wanted him for a reason though, and got him.

The only dissapointment I have right now is that they didn't get Groves before the Jags did, but I'm guessing if they didn't it's because Bill didn't think he was worth it (same reason we didn't take Connor).

The amount of people dissapointed or crying about this draft is pretty hysterical. It's the same thing EVERY SINGLE YEAR.
Seels is offline  
Old 04-27-2008, 12:34 AM   #7
ALP
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ALP's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,151
Default Re: The Pats did not "reach" for Mayo or Wheatley

they were both slight reaches....but they filled team needs, which makes those reaches disappear

when u get a guy u like at a position u like, and that guy pans out, they u havnt reached
__________________
Last time I lived in New England the Pats became a Dynasty

Then I moved away and they haven't won since

...now I'm moving back, and a Lombardi I predict
ALP is offline  
Old 04-27-2008, 12:37 AM   #8
Banned
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 430
Default Re: The Pats did not \"reach\" for Mayo or Wheatley

Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick View Post
The Pats pretty clearly viewed Mayo as a rare player, and he legitimately could have gone as early as 11.

As for Wheatley, who knows? He was one of those players who I would read about and wonder \"where\'s the catch\"? Why ranked so low? The writeups on his skills are drool-worthy, and his measurables are tremendous. Yes he\'s small, but so were higher-rated CBs like Flowers and Porter. So I concluded that the injury was the problem, and likely a serious one. If his health really isn\'t an issue, he\'s a fine pick at 62 -- especially taking into account that he was probably the single best KR left in the draft.
KR in the NFL is very different. We already have Hobbs as a KR and this kid is no different than Hobbs.

I will continue to suggest that it is a wasted pick and lsee what happens in camp.
MosiT is offline  
Old 04-27-2008, 12:40 AM   #9
ALP
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ALP's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,151
Default Re: The Pats did not \"reach\" for Mayo or Wheatley

Quote:
Originally Posted by MosiT View Post
KR in the NFL is very different. We already have Hobbs as a KR and this kid is no different than Hobbs.

I will continue to suggest that it is a wasted pick and lsee what happens in camp.
if he becomes a Starting corner for us either opposite hobbs or in the slot, it was a GREAT pick

not often u get a rookie be starting on an 18-1 team
__________________
Last time I lived in New England the Pats became a Dynasty

Then I moved away and they haven't won since

...now I'm moving back, and a Lombardi I predict
ALP is offline  
Old 04-27-2008, 12:45 AM   #10
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: quincy
Posts: 1,420
Default Re: The Pats did not "reach" for Mayo or Wheatley

I dont like the fact that we got LESS than a 3rd rd pick to move back to 10. It seems to me we wanted to give Ellis to NO, and I think we should have had cincy bid against them to up the ante. I mean 2 picks earlier they were offering their first and second in todays draft AND their first next year....I cant believe we got LESS than a 3rd from this same team for the 2nd best DT.
jeffbiologist is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC