New 3-round mock from NFLDraftwatch - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2008, 03:50 PM   #1
In the Starting Line-up
 
Seneschal2's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,221
My Mood: Inspired
Default New 3-round mock from NFLDraftwatch

Interesting explanations for all three rounds and an A for effort:

http://nfldraftwatch.net/?page_id=184

Pats picks:

7. New England Patriots - Gholston, Vernon, DE Ohio State
63. New England Patriots - Wheeler, Philip, ILB Georgia Tech
68. New England Patriots - Lee, Patrick, CB Auburn
95. New England Patriots - Simpson, Jerome, WR Coastal Carolina

Also, I do like the idea of Jake Long going #1.
__________________
"What we want to try to do is maximize each spot on the roster; we want to be stronger at No. 1 than the opponent, stronger at No. 25 than they are, and stronger at No. 53 than they are, we're always looking to upgrade the talent level on the team, and play together to be functional."
- Bill Belichick -
Seneschal2 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 03-09-2008, 04:10 PM   #2
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,569
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: New 3-round mock from NFLDraftwatch

Not sure about Simpson but I like the other three picks a lot.

The DT (Dorsey, Ellis) are interesting - I hope they go before our pick as it pushes need position players down to us but if the DT happen to slip down, that is a position that teams will trade up for.
BelichickFan is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 04:26 PM   #3
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,650
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: New 3-round mock from NFLDraftwatch

I really wish these places doing Mocks would look at the WHOLE of a team before saying things like " Simpson is like Stallworth so the Pats may be interested."

No, the Pats won't be interested because the Pats CHOSE to let Stallworth go. They also have a player named Chad Jackson who spent most of last year recovering from a Torn ACL he got during his rookie season.

Now, if Jackson were to FLOP this year, then I would think that the Pats would be looking NEXT year. But not before then.
DaBruinz is online now  
Old 03-09-2008, 04:32 PM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,371
Default Re: New 3-round mock from NFLDraftwatch

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan View Post
Not sure about Simpson but I like the other three picks a lot.

The DT (Dorsey, Ellis) are interesting - I hope they go before our pick as it pushes need position players down to us but if the DT happen to slip down, that is a position that teams will trade up for.

Agree. Love the 1st three picks. He doesn't have Chevis Jackson in there. CB - LSU. Let's sub him for the wr and call it a day.
patsfaninpa is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 04:46 PM   #5
U.S. Air Force Retired
 
Boston Boxer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 2,295
My Mood: Buzzed
Send a message via Yahoo to Boston Boxer
Default Re: New 3-round mock from NFLDraftwatch

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
I really wish these places doing Mocks would look at the WHOLE of a team before saying things like " Simpson is like Stallworth so the Pats may be interested."

No, the Pats won't be interested because the Pats CHOSE to let Stallworth go. They also have a player named Chad Jackson who spent most of last year recovering from a Torn ACL he got during his rookie season.

Now, if Jackson were to FLOP this year, then I would think that the Pats would be looking NEXT year. But not before then.
i think the mock says he is vey Moss like not Stallworth.
Boston Boxer is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 04:57 PM   #6
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,650
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: New 3-round mock from NFLDraftwatch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston Boxer View Post
i think the mock says he is vey Moss like not Stallworth.
That's even worse then. The Pats don't need two speed burners on the outside. They need DIFFERENT weapons.
DaBruinz is online now  
Old 03-09-2008, 06:44 PM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,013
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: New 3-round mock from NFLDraftwatch

If Matt Ryan is sitting there, I think its a perfect time for the pats to make some phone calls (ie chicago) and move back a few spots and pick up a couple of additional picks..
Or Just call Baltimore and say move up 1 spot and give us your #2.. Kinda like what Detriot did to Cleveland a few years back when the browns moved up 1 spot to get Kellen Winslow and gave up a 2nd..
mcsully is offline  
Old 03-10-2008, 01:47 PM   #8
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,615
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
That's even worse then. The Pats don't need two speed burners on the outside. They need DIFFERENT weapons.
Very rarely do I have to agree with somebody who knows next to nothing about the game, has never played the game, and has no clue what goes on in practices or the locker room, but I am in 100% agreement with you on this point.

Moss is great at running the go and fly patterns, but he is very shy about going over the middle and when he does go over the middle he usually goes down on first contact.

Welker is lightening quick and handles all the short routes over the middle and with some help from Faulk covers the flats as well.

The gaping hole in the Pats attack is the mid to deep seam route. Stallworth did Ok early in the season running it, but then stopped and Gaffney isn't fast enough to run it.
Watson would be ideal, but hasn't gotten caught the ball consistently enough. And I don't hold out much hope for any other TE either on staff, including Thomas or in the draft being able to do it.

However WR Steve Johnson of Kentucky was very productive in college in this area of the field. And he was productive with Woodson throwing some ducks to him, one that almost got him decapitated in the LSU game.

Johnson has decent not great speed, good hands and a willingness to venture into that part of the field. On first or second down, especially if play action is used, could really hurt a defense in the mid to deep seam or at worst open things up either under neath or deep for somebody else.
Ochmed Jones is offline  
Old 03-10-2008, 01:50 PM   #9
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,310
Default Re: New 3-round mock from NFLDraftwatch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ochmed Jones View Post
Welker is lightening quick and handles all the short routes over the middle and with some help from Faulk covers the flats as well.

The gaping hole in the Pats attack is the mid to deep seam route. Stallworth did Ok early in the season running it, but then stopped and Gaffney isn't fast enough to run it.
What about Chad Jackson?
BradyManny is offline  
Old 03-10-2008, 03:55 PM   #10
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,698
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: New 3-round mock from NFLDraftwatch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ochmed Jones View Post
Watson would be ideal, but hasn't gotten caught the ball consistently enough. And I don't hold out much hope for any other TE either on staff, including Thomas or in the draft being able to do it.
Just out of curiosity--how far downfield are you talking about? And, what makes you think Thomas can't do it? [I'm not taking a stand one way or the other.]
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566