04-10-2007, 08:34 PM
|
#11
|
|
PatsFans.com Supporter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
|
Re: Willis ideally 4-3 ILB, not 3-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by blh0240
if you read the first post the statement was "ideally". i believe willis is capable of playing in the 3-4, just as vilma is, however i dont see it making sense value wise for the pats to move up to get him. if he falls, he becomes BPA at 24 and im sure it wouldnt take long to pull the trigger. but to give up two late 1st rds for a player w/ some serious question marks playing in the complex pats 3-4 dosent make sense w/ all quality players that would be on the board at the end of the first round. coverage, taking on OL, and even intelligence/leadership are of concern in terms of putting willis in at ILB. while he is known as an "instintive" player (one of many buzz words that gets thrown around way too often), it was noted at the senior bowl that it was buster davis, not willis, who took control of the defense and established himself as the leader/shot caller. in the pats system, the mlb is the heart of the defense. even as bruschis physical skills have fallen, he is still able to make a major impact w/ his exceptional grasp of our system/ability to make reads. throwing someone like willis into the fire w/ a complex playbook/different system would be a questionable decision. at 24, we could afford to give him some time to learn the system and bring him along for next yr. but at a top 11 pick (he even looks like a bill), you would expect a player to come in a be a huge factor right away.
|
Davis did a much better job of dealing with OL trying to block him.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me." To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
|
|