Originally Posted by captain stone

1) I'm afraid that you may be right about Willis; Timmons and Beason are strictly 4-3 OLBs; I'm not sure if Posluszny and Siler have what it takes to handle the 3-4 ILB; and Harris isn't worthy of 24 or 28.

2) If Willis is gone by 24, then 2 DBs are the way to go. It now looks likely that Revis is also gone by 24. The UTexas tandem of Aaron Ross and Michael Griffin would be, in the words of Adam Sandler, not too shabby.

Originally Posted by sebman2112

I'd rather trade with GB. take one of the high level prospects with 16, and take one of the top prospects still left in the mid-second with 47. then use 92nd for another good player..

Originally Posted by captain stone

In another thread, I wrote that I would probably use 16 for either Willis or Revis.

My problem with the trade proposal is that, if Willis or Carriker were chosen with 16, then there might not be a CB worthy of 47. Should I then look at Safety instead, and use 92 on a CB?

Originally Posted by sebman2112

You could then look at Safety (Meriweather (if he falls), Weddle) You could look at O-Linemen, or RB's, or maybe a CB if someone falls. This is if they take a LB in the first. If they take a Safety with 16 they could grab a LB in the second, or third. there will be CB's in the third round, and Safeties in the third/4th round, as well.