#22 vs. #44, Position by Position - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2010, 04:16 PM   #1
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,320
Default #22 vs. #44, Position by Position

With 3 2nd-round picks in an ultra-deep draft, it would be great to be able to #22 as a luxury "BPA" pick. Go for an impact player, regardless (almost) of position, then start filling holes in round 2. Which made me wonder...is there a key position that the Pats could NOT realistically address in the 2nd and beyond? Where are the talent dropoffs between #22 and #44?

I tried to break this down, using the mock at mynfldraft.com as my baseline since they delivered a fairly sensible set of selections to the Pats (Odrick, LaFell, Misi, Anthony McCoy). Here are the players they have available at the two points at the most talked-about positions:

OLB
22: Sergio Kindle, Jerry Hughes, Carlos Dunlap, Ricky Sapp
44: Koa Misi, Austen Lane, Greg Hardy, Daniel Te'o-Nesheim

DE
22: Jared Odrick
24: Alex Carrington, Corey Wootton

WR
22: Demaryius Thomas, Arrelious Benn, Golden Tate, Damian Williams
44: Brandon LaFell, Dexter McCluster, Carlton Mitchell, Eric Decker, Taylor Price, Jacoby Ford, Mardy Gilyard

TE
22: Jermaine Gresham
44: Absolutely everybody else

RB
22: Jahvid Best
44: Jonathan Dwyer, Toby Gerhart, Ben Tate, Montario Hardesty

OT
22: Anthony Davis, Charles Brown
44: Rodger Saffold, Jared Veldheer

Other notable players drafted soon after #22:
OG/C Maurkice Pouncey, CB Kyle Wilson, DT Terrence Cody, LB Sean Weatherspoon


What do you think? Who's the pure BPA -- and is there a position that absolutely cannot wait?
patchick is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-05-2010, 04:36 PM   #2
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 267
Default Re: #22 vs. #44, Position by Position

I don't love any of the players you listed @22, that list is assuming nobody from the top 15 falls to us at 22 though.

If I had to pick one player from that group it would be Hughes or Pouncy, I like Hughes much better than any of the other LB's listed & Pouncy is a can't miss prospect with a low positional value.

If Graham, Spiller, McClain don't slide to us I hope we trade back to the top of the 2nd & take our highest ranked BPA that slides from that group.

With the Washington trade I'm hoping Clauson slides to 22 & we score a coup of draft pick spoils from someone trading up.

There seems to be ALOT of prospects in this draft that have similiar value from 20-45 or so.
SeauOUCH is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 05:01 PM   #3
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Coach42's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 580
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: #22 vs. #44, Position by Position

Personally I think that this draft is deep enough that we should absolutely use 22 to take the best player available or {GASP} trade back a couple of slots like we did last year and stockpile a few more picks. We have plenty of holes so why not get some more ammo in one of the deepest drafts in a while.

For instance lets say Clausen and Bradford go in the top ten and some team like the Vikings love Colt McCoy. I would absolutely trade down to 30 for a third this year or a second next.
Coach42 is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 05:04 PM   #4
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,552
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: #22 vs. #44, Position by Position

I'd add Ryan Mathews to the #22 list.

But you've hit the nail on the head of why I still haven't come to a satisfctory (to me) pick at #22 because whoever I pick I have a good, secondary choice we could get with 2a. As of now De. Thomas is my pick but there's so many WR it's tough to stick with him. Same with Mathews given that I like Hardesty a lot.
BelichickFan is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 05:13 PM   #5
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,320
Default Re: #22 vs. #44, Position by Position

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan View Post
I'd add Ryan Mathews to the #22 list.

But you've hit the nail on the head of why I still haven't come to a satisfctory (to me) pick at #22 because whoever I pick I have a good, secondary choice we could get with 2a. As of now De. Thomas is my pick but there's so many WR it's tough to stick with him. Same with Mathews given that I like Hardesty a lot.
Matthews went at #20 in the mock I was using. But by and large, I'm finding the same thing. FWIW, though, Pouncey rates rounds above any other interior lineman on my board.
patchick is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 05:52 PM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 
Metaphors's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,662
Default Re: #22 vs. #44, Position by Position

I think it is DE since Odrick fits as a base 3-4 DE but Carrington and Wootton are too light. Not sure if Belichick considers Alualu, Houston or Woods as options later in the draft.

OLB seems to have more options, meaning a higher chance of someone being available at #44. But we don't know how Belichick evaluates them so his viable list could be much smaller.

So I would list DE as 1A and OLB as 1B. Hard to argue with either of those. Ideal would be walking away with Odrick+Hughes, but that may not be practical.
Metaphors is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 06:04 PM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: connecticut
Posts: 3,320
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: #22 vs. #44, Position by Position

for me pick #22 has to be defense. Sergio Kindle, is the best all round OLB in the draft. Jerry Hughes, is the best pure pass rusher. but dose not have the size that BB wants Jared Odrick, is the guy that would not have much to talk about stat wise as a rookie but would have the biggest impact on the defense as a rookie. and they can get Koa Misi, or jason worilds at #44 to play OLB
patsfan-1982 is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 06:07 PM   #8
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 416
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: #22 vs. #44, Position by Position

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metaphors View Post
I think it is DE since Odrick fits as a base 3-4 DE but Carrington and Wootton are too light. Not sure if Belichick considers Alualu, Houston or Woods as options later in the draft.

OLB seems to have more options, meaning a higher chance of someone being available at #44. But we don't know how Belichick evaluates them so his viable list could be much smaller.

So I would list DE as 1A and OLB as 1B. Hard to argue with either of those. Ideal would be walking away with Odrick+Hughes, but that may not be practical.
i agree hughes/kindle/sapp, then add mathews, hardesty, veldheer, saffold, gronkowski, pitta, hernandez, or a potential moss replacement with our other 2nd round picks

Last edited by bbell31; 04-05-2010 at 06:09 PM..
bbell31 is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 06:18 PM   #9
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 458
My Mood: Cool
Default Re: #22 vs. #44, Position by Position

Daniel Teo-neisheim played DE in a 4-3 for the Huskies, he would make for a huge OLB at 265 lbs and only ran a 4.8. Maybe you're thinking of Donald Butler? Either way I'd love to have either of them on the team. Both extremely hard workers and one of the few bright spots on the huskies the past few seasons. Butler is projected to go late 2nd/3rd now. Teo could probably be had 5th or lower.
Thirdbasekid24 is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 06:26 PM   #10
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,123
Default Re: #22 vs. #44, Position by Position

If Belichick judges HUGHES to be a fit, and he is there, then I suspect that he will be the choice.
==============================================
I have five that seem to be much better than what we can get in the 2nd. Belichick may also have Thomas there at WR.


ODRICK
He is the complete 3-4 DE, ready to contribute. If we can't get him, I'm fine with Carrington, but I think the difference is large.

GRESHAM
Again, this is not at all close for me. I expect us to try to trade a 2nd for a TE. Otherwise, Gresham is a strong possibility.

HUGHES
As we get closer and closer, Hughes seems more and more like the real deal.

WILSON
It's now or never. He's a stud. If we don't see the need, then we can go with what we have.

POUNCEY
Pouncy is our instant Game Day backup for the interior line positions, and could start at any of the positions if there was a need. He would expected to be a starter in 2011 wherever he is needed.
mgteich is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Building your own Patriots roster depth chart position by position - Week 5 OL MalaysiaPatsFan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 13 06-20-2006 12:41 AM
Building your own Patriots roster depth chart position by position - Week 3 WR MalaysiaPatsFan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 24 06-03-2006 10:59 AM
Building your draft board position by position - week 8: Safety/Special Teams Box_O_Rocks Patriots Draft Talk 17 04-21-2006 10:45 PM
Building your draft board position by position - week 1: 3-4 Defensive Linemen Box_O_Rocks Patriots Draft Talk 28 04-21-2006 10:44 PM
Building your draft board position by position - week 2: Offense, Interior Linemen Box_O_Rocks Patriots Draft Talk 19 04-17-2006 09:54 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC