Building your draft board position by position - week 2: Offense, Interior Linemen - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2006, 10:23 AM   #1
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default Building your draft board position by position - week 2: Offense, Interior Linemen

Building your Draft Board - Week 2 is set to start. The focus here is the target rich environment of Interior Linemen; Offensive Center (OC) and Offensive Guard (OG). With all the posts begging for a "roadgrader", we should hopefully see a little more participation leading up to the Combine this week. BB's history here is pretty interesting and sparce, he drafted one OG off the Grier board in 2000 and one OC in 2003, both in the fifth round. He also drafted a LT at the end of the first round in 2005, then moved him inside to LG. Everybody else have been free agent hires. Still, this is a strong field with draftnik-rated value in each round, and a couple heavy-weight G's who have surprising mobility for their size. Many of the G candidates are OTs who are expected to move inside, some have done so in their All-Star games the way Mankins did last year, demonstrating their versatility on a national stage.

We started from http://www.gbnreport.com/positionalrankings.htm for the NT boards, and I recently shared http://www.northwestscouting.com/index.html which focuses on linemen, this gives everybody a good starting point. I encourage you to scour the web and your draft preview subscriptions for alternative sources - the more the merrier (and share them!).

There are no rules to building your line, if you want to draft an OT and move him inside do so, but please tell us you did and why you see them succeeding within the Patriots' system.

As noted above, the Combine starts this week, I started the draft board discussions with 3-4 DLs and Interior Linemen as the two areas least likely to be severely impacted by Combine scores. I expect people to revisit their boards as new information changes their assessments, if finding a 320 lb. DT who runs a sub-4.8/40 at the Combine excites you, by all means go back and update your NT board; but please use a color change to make your updates easier to spot, thank you.

Have fun, I must now brave the fickle wind to run the snow blower.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-19-2006, 11:28 AM   #2
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,447
My Mood: Mellow
Default What to look for...

The Pats have a physical and mental profile for interior linemen.

On the roster today:

Billy Yates 6-2 305
Ross Tucker 6-4 316
Ryan Krug 6-4 304
Stephen Neal 6-4 305
Russ Hochstein 6-4 305
Nick Steitz 6-3 315
Gene Mruczkowski 6-2 305
Nick Kaczur 6-4 319
Logan Mankins 6-4 307

Note that they're all "lean" 300#ers: no beer guts or rolls of fat.

I took a look at the Combine results from last year, and for the most part, OG prospects are largely indistinguishable on paper. Here are some stats from 2005: http://2005.draftboardinsider.com/guard.html

One thing that stood out to me, tho, is that of 22 Gaurds at the Combine last year only 6 of them had verticals over 30 inches. And 3 of those 6 (Kaczur, Mankins and Steitz) are now on the Pats roster. Coincidence? Maybe not. The Pats prefer mobile athletic linemen who can move and the vertical jump may be a good measure for how "earthbound" an interior lineman is.

Also worth a mention, both Kaczur and Mankins were in the top third of the Wonderlic at their position... not the best, but both respectable. Steitz was middle of the pack.

After Mankins and Kaczur got to know each other, they remarked on how similar they were in personality. I'm sure that's not an accident.

Prospects at the position should be
1) 6-3/6-4, 305-315-- 340# roadgraders sound nice in concept, but we're a zone blocking team
2) Lean and athletic, with solid footwork
3) I'll be watching the Combine results for OGs who get over 31 inches on their vertical, plus a Wonderlic in the high 20s or low 30s
4) Loves football, dedicated to the team, puts in the work
5) Easy going personality, good teammate in the clubhouse
6) G/C or G/T flexibility is a big plus
7) Small school or conference is neutral, not a negative
__________________
"We want to build a big, strong, tough, smart, fast, disciplined football team that will consistently compete for a championship."
-- Scott Pioli, from the Patriots scouting manual
rookBoston is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 03:02 PM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
The Gr8est's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,770
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default

Damn that's some fine work you've done rook. I really appreciate what you bring to this site.

Keep up the great work!
The Gr8est is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 07:09 PM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 
kurtinelson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,344
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rookBoston
The Pats have a physical and mental profile for interior linemen.
Excellent analysis. I agree in that the Pats will probably not be looking at the big body OGs such as Max Jean-Giles or Duece Latui in this year's draft.

I'm intrigued by OT Colledge from Boisie State. I have a feeling that he fits the Pats profile pretty well. I wonder if he could move inside to RG to replace Neal and eventually challenge Light for LT?
__________________
"Tonight a dynasty is born" - Ricky Proehl before the start of Super Bowl XXXVI


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
kurtinelson is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 07:36 PM   #5
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,336
Default

Wonderful summary Rook, thanks!

One comment...

Quote:
Originally Posted by rookBoston
5) Easy going personality, good teammate in the clubhouse
I'd just want to clarify that's an easygoing personality off the field. On-field nastiness is coveted.
patchick is offline  
Old 02-20-2006, 12:36 PM   #6
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,615
Default

Rook did a nice job of discussing what the Pats look for in on the OL. However I wanted to add a couple of things that are clearly Patriot when it comes to OG and Cs.

As Rook said, the Pats prefer mobile, smart guys that communicate well and work well with others, no free lancers in this group. These guys have to be in shape, no fat space eaters on the OL. Another common theme is strength. BB prefers guys that are naturally strong and have good pop at the snap of the ball. These guys must be able to use their hands well. They also have to be knee benders that can get leverage on the DL. In the Pats system, the interior OL guys don't have to be able to drvie DL off the ball and into the secondary, but the have to be able to create a crease or seal.

After BB drafted Koppen, he talked about Koppen's strength as something that caught his eye. I don't think BB was talking about the kind of strength associated with lifting 225 lbs 40 times, he was talking about natural strength (which some consider a product of leverage to a certain extent.) It's what I call "functional football strength".

There are some guys in this draft that have that type of strength, but the one guy that really stands out in this regard is Setterstrom of Minneasota. As far as run blocking goes, he's a technical master and he has the natural strength to back it up. Unfortunately, he can't pass block. I would be petrified if Brady dropped back to pass and this guy was at OG for us as a rookie.

Another guy that I see as having the qualities that the Pats like is Lentz of Michigan. The good thing here is that depending on how is does at the combine, we might be able to wait and bag him on day two and he could possibly step into Neal's spot fairly early. (If Neal takes the trap door out of town.)

As far as early picks go, I remain intrigued with Joseph, he doesn't play smart, so I don't think he gets the BB seal of approval, but he has talent.
Ochmed Jones is offline  
Old 02-21-2006, 12:16 AM   #7
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default

I have no serious expectation the Pats will take a G/C on day one (there is plenty of day two talent to like), but with all four of these guys displaying Patriot versatility, they make my day one board.

-----

Charles Spencer 6'5" 330 5.15/40 Pittsburgh: Converted DT, showed good mobility pulling in the Senior Bowl. Starting experience at LT. Great prospect for the Dante Linemen Academy with a lot of upside and flexibility to play G and T. A big plus is his teamwork and his dedication to making the transition to O-line. Played DT and TE in high school. Has the nasty attitude BB likes as well as the willingness to play new positions to help the team.
Concerns: Weight, may be too heavy to last an entire 23 game season in the Pats’ offense. Inexperience on the O-line.
Projected: 2nd round, probably early.
http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/sco...esspencer.html
http://www.nfldraftforecast.com/Prof...sspencer.shtml
http://www.nflfans.com/x/2006/showpl...rles%20Spencer
http://pittsburghpanthers.collegespo...charles00.html
http://therealmockdraft7.blogspot.com/
http://2006.ontheclockdraft.com/prof...16272037002947
http://www.northwestscouting.com/custom.html

Davin Joseph 6'4" 315 5.12/40 Oklahoma: Played RG and LT in College, G and DT in high school, was also a highly rated wrestler in high school. Has the versatility, mobility, and nastiness the Pats like.
Concerns: Ochmed's comments may affect my final board...
Projected: 2nd round.
http://www.northwestscouting.com/custom.html
http://2006.ontheclockdraft.com/prof...21053091536786
http://www.draftseason.com/index2.ph...Profile2&id=59
http://www.draftdatabase.com/z_BIO_O...h_Oklahoma.htm
http://www.nfldraftforecast.com/Prof...injoseph.shtml
http://therealmockdraft7.blogspot.com/
http://www.soonersports.com/ViewArti...&Q_SEASON=2005
http://www.nflfans.com/x/2006/showpl...Davin%20Joseph

Rob Sims 6'4" 310 5.25/40 Ohio State: Showed good mobility in the Shrine Game, took reps at LG and RG, started at LT and LG at Ohio State.
Concerns: Some write-ups felt he didn’t always play up to his potential.
Projected: 3rd round.
http://www.nflfans.com/x/2006/showpr...key=Rob%20Sims
http://ohiostatebuckeyes.collegespor...ims_rob00.html
http://www.nfldraftforecast.com/Profiles/robsims.shtml
http://therealmockdraft7.blogspot.com/
http://www.draftdaddy.com/prospects/EastWest.cfm
http://www.northwestscouting.com/custom.html

Ryan Cook 6'7" 322 5.29/40 New Mexico: Considered too tall for C by some, started cross training at RT his senior season and played RT a couple series in the Senior Bowl. Strong player with decent foot speed and mobility - walk-on who won the starting C job with his hard work. Another Dante Academy prospect.
Concerns: Inexperienced at G and T.
Projected: 3rd round. A better value for the Pats if he slips to the 4th round, but worth consideration in 3rd.
http://golobos.collegesports.com/spo...ok_ryan00.html
http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/sco.../ryancook.html
http://www.nflfans.com/x/2006/showpl...ey=Ryan%20Cook
http://2006.ontheclockdraft.com/prof...16135189566443
http://www.nfldraftforecast.com/Profiles/ryancook.shtml
http://therealmockdraft7.blogspot.co...e-centers.html
http://www.northwestscouting.com/custom.html

Other players with day one grades:
Nick Mangold 6'4" 296 4.96/40 Ohio State: Consensus #1 rated C, had a good Senior Bowl. Nice prospect, but likely to go too high for my board.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline  
Old 02-21-2006, 01:23 PM   #8
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,615
Default

I want to clarify one comment on Joseph. His not playing smart doesn't mean to imply, he's stupid. It's more of an instincts or lack thereof kind as assessment. I think the reason he seemed to get lost at time out there was more a product of playing in several spots on the OL over his career. It may have hindered his mastery of the OG spot from an instincts and reaction point of view.

I'm still very high on Joseph. He has durability and big game experience. If I thought he could project along the lines of a Waters of KC, then I'd be happy to take him in the second round.

PS: Another interesting day 2/UDFA OG prospect/project to consider is Boothe. Not a big time program, but he has the exceptional hand strength that BB loves in OL. He's a few years away at this point, but this is the type of raw material that BB could do something with.
Ochmed Jones is offline  
Old 02-21-2006, 03:20 PM   #9
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ochmed Jones
I want to clarify one comment on Joseph. His not playing smart doesn't mean to imply, he's stupid. It's more of an instincts or lack thereof kind as assessment. I think the reason he seemed to get lost at time out there was more a product of playing in several spots on the OL over his career. It may have hindered his mastery of the OG spot from an instincts and reaction point of view.

I'm still very high on Joseph. He has durability and big game experience. If I thought he could project along the lines of a Waters of KC, then I'd be happy to take him in the second round.

PS: Another interesting day 2/UDFA OG prospect/project to consider is Boothe. Not a big time program, but he has the exceptional hand strength that BB loves in OL. He's a few years away at this point, but this is the type of raw material that BB could do something with.
Thanks for the clarification. Boothe is already on my board.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline  
Old 02-21-2006, 09:13 PM   #10
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,336
Default

My OG board, I just realized, is totally focused on college tackles...

DAY ONE

Daryn Colledge, Boise State
The dominant LT in his small conference, he's a bit small for an NFL LT but could look dominant at guard. An agile athlete for his size, he demonstrates excellent footwork and balance and is very good with his hands. A smart, tough player with strong fundamentals who can run block and pass block. Nope, that's not a description of Daryn Colledge...it's Logan Mankins from last year. But it fits.

Rob Sims, Ohio State
Played all along the line in college, including LT and RT. Great agility and footwork; long arms with good strength and punch. Plays with a nice mean streak. Football family (father played for the Browns).

DAY TWO

Tre' Stallings, Mississippi
Not highly rated at this point, but seems to fit the Patriots profile. 6'4" 317. College LT. Outstanding work ethic, character, leadership. Tough, smart, great motor, good agility, good footwork and fundamentals. Football family (father played TE for the Cardinals). Possible issues: speed, strength.

Adam Stenavich, Michigan
An LT equally adept at pass and run blocking, Stenavich is intelligent and technically sound. Hard worker, good feet, plays with good strength and leverage. Possible issue: agility. Could project to either tackle or guard -- at 6'5" 320 5.28, he has *exactly* the same measurables as Kaczur last year.

Travis Leffew, Louisville
This slightly undersized LT (6'4" 305) is universally described as intelligent, coachable and competitive. Excellent athleticism, agility and footwork in pass protection; pulls well. Possible issues: strength, overall run blocking.
patchick is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566