Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-30-2009, 06:13 PM   #11
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 354
Default Re: 10/28 Kiper big board and positional rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreeTedWilliams View Post
He's no Dwight Freeney if that is what you are asking. Jones is a very good player on a bad team. He plays DE at Syracuse but they move him around to try and mess up the other teams blocking schemes (becuase basically he is the only guy you have to block). He is 6'3" 290ish, he lives in the offensive backfield, would be an outstanding 4-3 inside tackle, he would be an excellent DE in a 3-4 defense (although he lacks the height that BB likes in that position). His 40 times will be about 5 flat. He will most likely get drafted in last third of the first round.

Of course, if your Indy, and every Syracuse player you ever drafted, ends up in the HOF, I'd take a shot at him.
Nah, I realized that he'd be a DT for the Colts. Is he a penetrator type like the Colts look for in a DT? That's what I'm wondering. For example, I'm not sure that Odrick is a penetrating type like the Colts usually look for, IMO he may be a better fit as a 3-4 DE for a team like the Pats.

Also, could he play NT in the NFL, or is he more of a UT? If he can't play NT, then I think Marvin Austin or Brian Price could be more likely for the Colts. I don't see the Colts taking a pure UT unless it was a special guy like McCoy that you couldn't pass up, since we drafted Moala last year and also have a decent player in Foster.
coltsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188

Updated 10/31/09

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 10-30-2009, 07:00 PM   #12
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: 10/28 Kiper big board and positional rankings

It may not be an probowler at every position but the Patriots have the benefit of having no glaring holes heading into next year (assumes no CBA).

Ghost & Mankins could be tagged as RFAs
Wilfork could be franchised (if people don't think Big Vince is valuable watch when the Patriots play against the Wildcat, he is the key)

They can add even more depth to a very good team.
cstjohn17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 11:25 PM   #13
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 210
Default Re: 10/28 Kiper big board and positional rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by cstjohn17 View Post
It may not be an probowler at every position but the Patriots have the benefit of having no glaring holes heading into next year (assumes no CBA).
I would say we have a really huge hole at passrushing OLB.
Marqui is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 09:11 AM   #14
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
chrisfx811's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 765
Default Re: 10/28 Kiper big board and positional rankings

How's Brandon Spikes ranked by Mel?

Mayo/Spikes inside, with Spikes able to rush the passer as well, and covers TEs and Rbs well.
chrisfx811 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 06:11 PM   #15
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 115
Default Re: 10/28 Kiper big board and positional rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by coltsfan View Post
Nah, I realized that he'd be a DT for the Colts. Is he a penetrator type like the Colts look for in a DT? That's what I'm wondering. For example, I'm not sure that Odrick is a penetrating type like the Colts usually look for, IMO he may be a better fit as a 3-4 DE for a team like the Pats.

Also, could he play NT in the NFL, or is he more of a UT? If he can't play NT, then I think Marvin Austin or Brian Price could be more likely for the Colts. I don't see the Colts taking a pure UT unless it was a special guy like McCoy that you couldn't pass up, since we drafted Moala last year and also have a decent player in Foster.
I don't think the premier DT's are going to last until the Colts pick. Teams like the Titans, Texans, Jets (Jenkins is getting up there), Steelers (Hampton is getting up there), Chargers (Jamal Williams is getting up there), Lions, Bucks, Panthers, Seahawks, and Rams could all use help at that position. Also, all of those teams have a worse record than the Colts, and most likely will be picking before you. No sarcasm or offense intended, but I'm just telling it like it is.
SidelineSid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 07:24 AM   #16
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: 10/28 Kiper big board and positional rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marqui View Post
I would say we have a really huge hole at passrushing OLB.
Every unit can be improved but at OLB the Patriots have:
Thomas, TBC, Cable - under contract
Ninkovich - Restricted Free Agent

Just an example why the Patriots may not be stacked at every spot but there is no need to reach.
cstjohn17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 11:51 AM   #17
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,001
Default Re: 10/28 Kiper big board and positional rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by cstjohn17 View Post
Every unit can be improved but at OLB the Patriots have:
Thomas, TBC, Cable - under contract
Ninkovich - Restricted Free Agent

Just an example why the Patriots may not be stacked at every spot but there is no need to reach.
Thomas will be cut next year....salary vs production...lost some of his athletism
TBC best of a limited group, cost effective starter, good motor
Crable...will never play a single down for the Patriots
Burgess...his role has expanded but the eye test doesn't see results

Far from being stacked, this group is weakest on roster and lacks athletism...JMO
borg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 02:57 PM   #18
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,895
Default Re: 10/28 Kiper big board and positional rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by borg View Post
Thomas will be cut next year....salary vs production...lost some of his athletism
TBC best of a limited group, cost effective starter, good motor
Crable...will never play a single down for the Patriots
Burgess...his role has expanded but the eye test doesn't see results

Far from being stacked, this group is weakest on roster and lacks athletism...JMO
I would agree 100% that the OLB is the weakest and least athletic spot on the roster. But it is also the hardest to find via the draft. BB passed on at least a half dozen decent OLB's in the draft last year. All brought something a little diffeent to the position so he had a wide variety to pick from, but he passed.

Maybe for upgrading the OLB spot, we should really be concentrating on potential FA that will be available. Is there a young version of Brabel in this year's potential FA pool?
Ochmed Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 03:02 PM   #19
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: 10/28 Kiper big board and positional rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by borg View Post
Thomas will be cut next year....salary vs production...lost some of his athletism
TBC best of a limited group, cost effective starter, good motor
Crable...will never play a single down for the Patriots
Burgess...his role has expanded but the eye test doesn't see results

Far from being stacked, this group is weakest on roster and lacks athletism...JMO
I didn't say there were stacked, I said 'They may not be stacked'

IMO the Patriots OLB/DE are among the weakest units in the league. But they are bringing back most of the current unit so if they want to run out the same horse crap next year then it is their option.
cstjohn17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 03:08 PM   #20
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,895
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cstjohn17 View Post
I didn't say there were stacked, I said 'They may not be stacked'

IMO the Patriots OLB/DE are among the weakest units in the league. But they are bringing back most of the current unit so if they want to run out the same horse crap next year then it is their option.
So would you bring back Thomas next season?
Ochmed Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links


PATRIOTS MERCHANDISE

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426