Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Let me be struck my lightening for even considering it...
Brandon Pettigrew is pretty much the complete package at TE. He can't stretch the field like Winslow, etc. but who can?
In year one he would provide solid depth in a rotation with Baker and Watson (bye bye Thomas). With all the deep speed (Moss & Galloway) there will be room underneath to operate, with Welker getting a lot of attention it is hard to imagine any of the Patriots TEs getting double covered all year. Depending on where Brady's knee is the Pats may be running the ball more than people expect this good mean more 2 TE sets (anyone remember the good old days, circa 2006, when the 2 TE set was going to change football forever...).
As I see it the worst case has him being a Daniel Graham type (with better hands, not quite as good blocker but close) best case is he is a Jason Whitten type that can make a living with the 5-7 yard option.
Watson and Thomas are free agents after 2009 opening the door for him to start after year 1.
Leave no stone unturned, this is the year that I will not be surprised...
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Let me be struck my lightening for even considering it...
Brandon Pettigrew is pretty much the complete package at TE. He can't stretch the field like Winslow, etc. but who can?
In year one he would provide solid depth in a rotation with Baker and Watson (bye bye Thomas). With all the deep speed (Moss & Galloway) there will be room underneath to operate, with Welker getting a lot of attention it is hard to imagine any of the Patriots TEs getting double covered all year. Depending on where Brady's knee is the Pats may be running the ball more than people expect this good mean more 2 TE sets (anyone remember the good old days, circa 2006, when the 2 TE set was going to change football forever...).
As I see it the worst case has him being a Daniel Graham type (with better hands, not quite as good blocker but close) best case is he is a Jason Whitten type that can make a living with the 5-7 yard option.
Watson and Thomas are free agents after 2009 opening the door for him to start after year 1.
Leave no stone unturned, this is the year that I will not be surprised...
I would have agreed with you before the Chris Baker signing, but Baker is essentially the same kind of package. Not as much upside, but definitely NFL ready, and a nice approximation of Dan Graham.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid
"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
they tell you in business - sell high, buy low. TE's always in demand are in short supply this year - in terms of a total player. Somebody will reach and reach badly on this guy.
Now if they plan on axing Thomas, then a lower round pick makes perfect sense.
However given the draft position we hold this year, we can address immediate needs such as OLB and S, and needs for '10 such as LT, DL, RG
If we hit it strong on the draft next year, we might need a CB, TE, WR, RB, perhaps another DL (oh oh), and maybe a C and P.
I agree that someone will probably reach for Pettigrew, but I don't see it being the Patriots. Depending on who is left, I see them taking an OT or a DE/OLB with that first pick since there is a number of both that are projected as first rounders in this draft.
I'm not a huge fan of taking a TE but you can do worse than get a dominant blocking/capable receiving TE. I see him as a better blocking version of Jason Witten. We may trade up or trade some picks to 2010 but if we use all our picks we'll likely use them on BPA as we don't have a lot of holes to fill. I'm not prediciting it but if they both last I could see a shocker of Pettigrew/Donald Brown at 23/34 because we'd still have two 2s and two 3s to get a LB or two and a Safety.
Pettigrew is a strong all-around player who should be a solid contributor for years. In a different draft year, though, he wouldn't be in the 1st-round discussion. IMO you only consider him in round 1 if your team has a glaring hole at the position, which the Pats clearly do not.
Pettigrew is a strong all-around player who should be a solid contributor for years. In a different draft year, though, he wouldn't be in the 1st-round discussion. IMO you only consider him in round 1 if your team has a glaring hole at the position, which the Pats clearly do not.
So I think we're safe.
When it comes to BB and big physical tight ends WE ARE NEVER SAFE.
I'm not a huge fan of taking a TE but you can do worse than get a dominant blocking/capable receiving TE. I see him as a better blocking version of Jason Witten. We may trade up or trade some picks to 2010 but if we use all our picks we'll likely use them on BPA as we don't have a lot of holes to fill. I'm not prediciting it but if they both last I could see a shocker of Pettigrew/Donald Brown at 23/34 because we'd still have two 2s and two 3s to get a LB or two and a Safety.
I've been thinking along the same lines. I wouldn't be too deflated, they are two very capable players we are talking about after all. As much as I think about not taking a TE Pettigrew does intrique me to say the least.
I don't get the Pettigrew love myself. He's slow, soft, and has questionable hands. I think he's probably the second coming of Duane Carswell. He won't get open at the next level, and a first round pick for a blocking tight end seems excessive.
__________________ When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee