Report: two USC LB test positive for Steroids (unconfirmed) - Page 5 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-03-2009, 09:39 AM   #41
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,297
Default re: Report: two USC LB test positive for Steroids (unconfirmed)

One quick point re: steroids v. marijuana, which should affect a guy's draft stock more...

First, in regards to either drug, a team drafting him would be working under the assumption that they could keep the kid from using.

The main difference is this....

Marijuana either a) has no effect on athletic performance b) has some negative effect on performance. Raji and others who tested positive for it excelled as a football player in spite of their marijuana usage. Presumably, they will stop in the NFL, and their production can only get better. If they do not stop, likely their performance will not be affected, but they may face disciplinary consequences.

Steroids has a positive effect on athletic performance. Instead of succeeding in spite of a drug (marijuana), they suceeded because of a drug (roids). The players caught doing that can only see their production and performance drop when they are off the steroids. Presumably they will stop in the NFL, and their production, ability & size will all diminish. If they do not stop, their production may remain strong, but they will face worse disciplinary consequences from the league than the marijuana users.
BradyManny is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-03-2009, 09:58 AM   #42
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,690
Default re: Report: two USC LB test positive for Steroids (unconfirmed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by condon84 View Post
Guarantee that over 50% players smoke weed in the NFL. Maybe even more. And probably a larger percentage use some type of illegal performance enhancing drug. The question is, do we really care?
Yes.
Herbious Weedious is hence proven to be addictive. What were those complete dummies thinking about? The U.S.C. "Steroids Cookoos" pair as well. The quote from U.S.C. "Having Raisnettes instead makes me run faster and they don't get in my way when I am lifting iron. Besides Lyle Alzado became a movie star, didn't he? ".

Seriously cousin. These idiots have cost themselves millions of dollars. They were going to be tested and knew it! Wouldn't you say the conclusion about all this was they could not stop?

Who's laughing at Rey Maualuga's Wonderlic right now? He's smarter than those two numbskulls and laughing his way up the draft board.

Speaking about that...Cousins, throw away all of your mock drafts as of yesterday I guess!

And finally, the Cheech and Chong brotherhood saw their "presidents" go...up in smoke!

"I can stop anytime.....don't Bogie that brudda!" Remember, your friends in high school told you it wasn't addicting.

DW Toys

Last edited by DW Toys; 04-03-2009 at 09:59 AM..
DW Toys is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 10:06 AM   #43
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,690
Default re: Report: two USC LB test positive for Steroids (unconfirmed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyManny2344 View Post
I'm not necessarily going to argue that, but I do have to point out that Michael Phelps, the greatest swimmer to ever walk the planet, use(s) marijuana, and apparently somewhere between 30-70% of NBA players use marijuana.
So that makes them less stupid? Because they use an addicting drug...Yep..tell me it's not. Let me know the big red flag, "I can stop anytime".
It's an automatic stupid stamped on your head!
DW Toys
DW Toys is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 10:09 AM   #44
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,690
Default re: Report: two USC LB test positive for Steroids (unconfirmed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by apple strudel View Post
I mentioned it earlier but it does it help Maualuga? It doesn't make his 40 any better, but it he'll probably stand out as a natural football player. Also, it helps that he isn't on anything in the middle of a culture of performance enhancing drugs (not that you get tons of good citizen points in the NFL).
Good.
DW Toys
DW Toys is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 10:10 AM   #45
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,690
Default re: Report: two USC LB test positive for Steroids (unconfirmed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks View Post
But it's not so can we just skip muddying the waters with that same tired whine.

And for those who say it never hurt anyone, just ask Tom Brady - cost him an entire season because Kevin Faulk failed to exercise discipline during his brief pro football career which is a requisite in winning football.

And that's the message here for the positive for non steroid crowd - football doesn't matter enough to some guys to give up their weed for a decade. To others it matters so much they are willing to cheat the game and possibly risk their lives to get a shot at being drafted or improving their financial bottom line.
Good points.
DW Toys
DW Toys is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 10:12 AM   #46
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,690
Default re: Report: two USC LB test positive for Steroids (unconfirmed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeB View Post
I'll believe it if it comes out on a real website. Who cares if they smoke weed? They are in college. Once they leave I'm sure they will stop since they will be tested for it.
Yea...I believe that.
DW Toys
DW Toys is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 10:13 AM   #47
In the Starting Line-up
 
alvinnf's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,258
My Mood: Tired
Default re: Report: two USC LB test positive for Steroids (unconfirmed)

Weed, see, Michael Phelps.
Roids, see, Lyle Alzado.
alvinnf is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 10:18 AM   #48
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,690
Default re: Report: two USC LB test positive for Steroids (unconfirmed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick View Post
Let's try to get this thread back to Cushing, Matthews and steroids rather than the eternal weed debate. (You always have the B.J. Raji thread for that!)

Let's assume for the moment that the Cushing/Matthews reports are true. What's the draft impact? Castillo was still drafted in the 1st, but IMO he was in a little more credible situation to claim he just made a bad decision trying to come back from injury. He wasn't an incredible physical specimen, more of a classice widebody DT.

The problem for Cushing and Matthews is that they already carried that "manufactured athlete" label, with bodybuilder physiques. Cushing has already had a series of the kind of soft-tissue injuries that are always a risk with steroid use. Matthews emerged from obscurity in a hurry, and a big part of his appeal was supposed to be "intangibles" and "bloodlines."

So if the reports are true, I could see both players hitting a serious draft freefall.
It is going to help Michael Johnson, who was a top twenty pick but dropped down to the second round. Now he becomes a better OLB/DE pick than the Roids brothers (P.S. Do you see that NFL Network segment with the weird doctor working on Cushing in NJ getting him "ready to play"...."Say Doc, my friend Matty needs to get ready to play too. Can we fix him up?")

DW Toys

Last edited by DW Toys; 04-03-2009 at 10:19 AM..
DW Toys is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 10:33 AM   #49
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Leave No Doubt's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 5,609
Default re: Report: two USC LB test positive for Steroids (unconfirmed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriot Missile View Post
If true this doesn't bode well for Barwin fans who want him to last until 23.

That was my first thought too, crap. If the story proves true then it could change everything. Obviously we don't know what BB has planned but assuming he has his eye on Barwin or one of the others in his class we might have to move up.

I just hope this isn't the tip of any icebergs; like now that 2 have been discovered will the league dig deeper and will there be more?

On a less binkier note, college kids doing roids is just a travesty. I saw a documentary sometime last year about HS kids dabbling too. One of the parents was trying to advise other parents on the warning signs,little things she had noticed but attributed those things to her son's increased workouts,growth,and simply gaining strength from all that. Little did she know her young son was into steriods.

As to these 2 guys, they'll bring all that baggage that goes along with a positive test to any NFL team who takes them. This HAS to affect our strategy to some degree
__________________
edit...2012 BABY!
Leave No Doubt is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 10:49 AM   #50
Paranoid Homer Moderator
 
PATSNUTme's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Homerville City
Posts: 14,644
My Mood: Devilish
Default re: Report: two USC LB test positive for Steroids (unconfirmed)

Oh how quick we are to stick the knife in the back and kick the sand over their graves.

I think I'll wait to hear from another source than "the draft Bible" before I judge them. I know that is foolish of me and I should shoot from the hip and denouce these two, but I'm going ot wait.

Please continue with the burning at a stake posts.
PATSNUTme is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Report: Faulk passes drug test Christopher_Price PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 1 02-28-2008 06:33 PM
Do You Favor Blacks or Whites? PatsWickedPissah Political Discussion 13 04-30-2006 07:17 PM
Positive test @ combine!! SamBamsFan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 1 04-27-2006 08:34 PM
Wrotten and Kicker Jon Scifers test positive R_T26 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 5 04-21-2006 09:03 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563