Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Again, I would be fine going DE if there was a standout prospect, but I just can't get worked up about any of these guys, except for Gilbert who is all promise.
I have scribbled somewhere some notes on a couple late round NTs noted as potential 3-4 DEs. I can't recall them OTOH to be honest, but that's about it for 3-4 DEs in this draft that are good Pats fits. I like Tyson Jackson alright, but I trust this board when it comes to scouting, and take note of the lack of enthusiasm here for him.
I agree - let's get a two-down run stuffer NT backup behind Wilfork, (Sammie Lee Hill or Ron Brace depending upon the round) and worry about DE in 2010 when the class is much stronger for it.
Last edited by BradyManny; 03-26-2009 at 11:31 AM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
BOTTOM LINE
If we can, let's draft the replacement for Green or Seymour now, expecting to keep one in 2010. And just BTW, if he is good enough, and belichick thinks enough of Smith, Green could be in trouble this year. We could be keeping two of the draftee, Green and Smith.
Maybe I'd agree if the draft were deeper at the position.
Even still, I think the Patriots do not draft planning ahead in this type of situation. They didn't draft replacements for Asante, Willie Mac, Colvin, Givens/Branch a year ahead. Spending a Day 1 pick on a player that might be rendered redundant if a more experienced veteran is re-signed is not something the Pats do.
Let's take a little break. We haven't had a DE discussion since the combine, and the likes of Tyson Jackson and Jarron Gilbert are beginning their inevitable climb up the mocks as the draft approaches...
I think at #34 or 47, you either trade the pick forward for a number 1 next year or you take a DE - Gilbert, Hood, Fioli. Either way you're addressing the 2010 potential need. Trading into next year's first round gives you added leverage to get a guy that can come in and start as a rookie, if Seymour departs.
That's easier said than done IMO. Who did you have in mind?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyManny2344
I have scribbled somewhere some notes on a couple late round NTs noted as potential 3-4 DEs. I can't recall them OTOH to be honest, but that's about it for 3-4 DEs in this draft that are good Pats fits. I like Tyson Jackson alright, but I trust this board when it comes to scouting, and take note of the lack of enthusiasm here for him.
I agree - let's get a two-down run stuffer NT backup behind Wilfork, (Sammie Lee Hill or Ron Brace depending upon the round) and worry about DE in 2010 when the class is much stronger for it.
Again I think DE's that fit our system are plentiful compared to finding "the NT backup to Wilfork". Ron Brace is the only day one prospect that comes to mind.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Even still, I think the Patriots do not draft planning ahead in this type of situation. They didn't draft replacements for Asante, Willie Mac, Colvin, Givens/Branch a year ahead. Spending a Day 1 pick on a player that might be rendered redundant if a more experienced veteran is re-signed is not something the Pats do.
I think that Marquise Hill was drafted at least in part because of the Seymour contract situation. I know Seymour's contract wasn't up until 2006, but drafting Hill in the 2nd round very likely was a hedge against the Seymour negotiations going south.
I also think that replacing Green and Seymour are two entirely different situations. Seymour's replacement would almost certainly be a DT in college and be comfortable playing at 300+ lbs. Moala would be a consideration and I like Dorell Scott as a later (3rd-4th) selection.
You could replace Green with a lighter DT or even a larger DE. Includes players like Gilbert and I like Kyle Moore as a later (4th) pick. Doesn't mean they are pass rush specialists. Just means that the DE's for the Pats are expected to eat up blockers (hopefully multiple on any given play). Traditional college tackles are better suited for doing that without breaking down.
With the number of picks available to the Pats, I wouldn't be surprised to see potential replacements for both Green and Seymour taken in this draft...though I think the talent in this draft class would be more "potential" than finished product.
Last edited by Metaphors; 03-26-2009 at 12:10 PM..
That's easier said than done IMO. Who did you have in mind?
Brace & Sammie Lee Hill, and like DE, there are some late round NT that were of interest when reading various reports, but the names are alluding me at this point. Even a guy who has fallen off the planet like Terrance Taylor has a shot as a reserve run plugger.
IMO, either Brace or Hill seems like better value than any DE prospect I can think of. Finding a backup run plugger in the 3-4 might not be an easy task, but in this specific draft, it looks easier than finding a 5-technique DE to replace Seymour.
With the number of picks available to the Pats, I wouldn't be surprised to see potential replacements for both Green and Seymour taken in this draft...though I think the talent in this draft class would be more "potential" than finished product.
But when I hear potential replacement for Seymour, I think it has to be a Round 1 player. It has to be a DE with elite potential, and the only guy who would fit the 3-4 and fit that mold is Jackson, and the reviews are mixed on him. 2010 will have some of those guys, it seems.
But I'll buy that we could add depth behind Seymour, and a less pricey insurance policy - the Marquise Hill comparison seems on point.
I think at #34 or 47, you either trade the pick forward for a number 1 next year or you take a DE - Gilbert, Hood, Fioli. Either way you're addressing the 2010 potential need. Trading into next year's first round gives you added leverage to get a guy that can come in and start as a rookie, if Seymour departs.
Why would the Pats trade #34 into next year in a deep draft? #34 is like a late 1st Rd pick at about $1 mil per season. I could see them doing that with either 47 or 58 and much more likely a later pick in Rds 4-6. My thinking is that the Pats will use their plethora of picks this year to move up and down the draft board to get their targeted players.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit."
Aristotle
"I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance."
Socrates
But when I hear potential replacement for Seymour, I think it has to be a Round 1 player. It has to be a DE with elite potential, and the only guy who would fit the 3-4 and fit that mold is Jackson, and the reviews are mixed on him. 2010 will have some of those guys, it seems.
But I'll buy that we could add depth behind Seymour, and a less pricey insurance policy - the Marquise Hill comparison seems on point.
I don't know if he has to be Seymour quality. With Warren and Wilfork on the line, and an improving LB corps (especially if we can get a downhill thumper silb), having a Spears quality DE would probably work well. Someone solid at the point of attack, a run-defender first.