Chairman & CEO of Team Bill
Intellectually bankrupt? Settle down...No. Just no.
That's totally an intellectually bankrupt comparison. You're comparing Woods from age 20 to age 45 against Nicklaus from age 20 to age 65. If Woods is healthy and plays to the same age, then all those percentages would come down by a LOT. You'd add about 70 to 80 majors to his totals with a damn decent chance he wouldn't have won any of 'em.
You need to look at the careers in their entirety and not cherry-pick years.
Jack chose to play after 86 and had three top 10 finishes. Thats on him.
Tiger chose to play and had one major win in 12 years. Thats also on him.
If you want to say Jack is better, go for it. I happen to agree with you.