Patriots Local Newsfeed:

SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:CBS Boston


SOURCE:CBS Boston


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:NESN

Patsfans.com


Upcoming Opponent:
Next Up: N/A
Right Now At PatsFans.com:
Point Proven
The critics have blasted them all season, but Sunday night the Patriots defense proved that they really are better than people think.


Current Patriots Twitter Feed:

Mr. @alexspeier compares Brady's game Sunday to his other AFCCG performances https://t.co/AgfeWtsexJ

With a chance to win a Super Bowl in his 1st playoffs, #Falcons C Alex Mack (ankle) is expected to play in SBLI. But will try to rest it.

Did some mild curl action after months of that kinda workout inactivity...now can't straighten my screaming arms to save my life. T-Rex City

#Falcons C Alex Mack is dealing with a swollen, painful sprained ankle, source said. He returned Sunday, but unlikely to practice this week

RT @OnlyInBOS: Captain America @ChrisEvans has launched an @Omaze campaign raising money for Boston non-profit @Chris_Haven: https://t.co/F…

@tcountie Go back and listen to @KirkAndCallahan's first hour this morning around 645 to hear what that tool LeBatard said..

@dennisroy33 @LeBatardShow I didn't say everyone..There are many and the double standard and hypocrisy that goes on over there is pathetic.

@adampellerin I know not this shampoo of which you speak

@SupremeManBoy yes, disguise, disrupt the routes & mix it up. That's what matters, not what you inevitably end up in.

Patriots installed as 3-point favorite for Super Bowl LI https://t.co/Gi3yBGnsPr

Could Jamie Collins' new deal with Browns impact Patriots’ negotiations with Dont’a Hightower? https://t.co/eDZXPgk9e0

Steelers admit they were surprised by Patriots’ offensive attack https://t.co/RYh7lTg6Ml

Patriots unveil schedule for days leading up to Super Bowl LI https://t.co/0XQwARXW4D

One example of the benefits to having Logan Ryan in the slot. Aggressive, good tackler. Playing confidently in ther… https://t.co/4uFyhZROI1

RT @WEEI: COLUMN: Is Patriots-Falcons the best offensive matchup in Super Bowl history? https://t.co/Qrj01pH1jm https://t.co/MfTaV5Drf1

RT @RyanHannable: How impressive have Edelman/Hogan been in playoffs? They have 79 percent of Brady's passing yards. Here's more:

RT @jaybusbee: Also included: "I'm drunk. I'm stupid. I'm a Pats fan." Subscribe! https://t.co/SuYooTOPc9

@SupremeManBoy Just choosing man doesn't do that, especially when pre-snap read of man invites, crossers, pick routes. etc.

@chatham58 Yup. Probably felt like He-Man for a second there.

@PhilAPerry assist on the pop from Roberts...

3 fat guys inside, who were keys going in, all played very well - Branch, Brown and Valentine https://t.co/zD24ZPicT6

Patriots had their way with Steelers RT Marcus Gilbert the other night. Here's Malcom Brown shoving Gilbert into De… https://t.co/kQIvGIZtLE

@AWash013 again, it's not a matter of whether it's zone or man the determines if Brady picks it apart. Long history of doing it either.


The true State of our Union

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by mikey, Jan 24, 2007.

  1. mikey

    mikey In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3
    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/24/opinion/24wed1.html?pagewanted=print

    NYT Editorial

    The State of the Union

    The White House spin ahead of George W. Bush’s seventh State of the Union address was that the president would make a bipartisan call to revive his domestic agenda with “bold and innovative concepts.” The problem with that was obvious last night — in six years, Mr. Bush has shown no interest in bipartisanship, and his domestic agenda was set years ago, with huge tax cuts for wealthy Americans and crippling debt for the country.

    Combined with the mounting cost of the war in Iraq, that makes boldness and innovation impossible unless Mr. Bush truly changes course. And he gave no hint of that last night. Instead, he offered up a tepid menu of ideas that would change little: a health insurance notion that would make only a tiny dent in a huge problem. More promises about cutting oil consumption with barely a word about global warming. And the same lip service about immigration reform on which he has failed to deliver.

    At times, Mr. Bush sounded almost as if he’d gotten the message of the 2006 elections. “Our citizens don’t much care which side of the aisle we sit on — as long as we are willing to cross that aisle when there is work to be done,” he said.

    But we’ve heard that from Mr. Bush before. In early 2001, he promised to bring Americans together and instead embarked on his irresponsible tax cuts, a divisive right-wing social agenda and a neo-conservative foreign policy that tore up international treaties and alienated even America’s closest allies. In the wake of 9/11, Mr. Bush had a second chance to rally the nation — and the world — only to squander it on a pointless, catastrophic war in Iraq. Mr. Bush promised bipartisanship after his re-election in 2004, and again after Hurricane Katrina. Always, he failed to deliver. He did not even mention New Orleans last night.

    When Republicans controlled Congress and the White House, Mr. Bush’s only real interest was in making their majority permanent; consultation meant telling the Democrats what he had decided.

    Neither broken promises nor failed policies changed Mr. Bush’s mind. So the nation has been saddled with tax cuts that have turned a budget surplus into a big deficit, education reform that has been badly managed and underfinanced, far-right judges with scant qualifications, the dismantling of regulations in order to benefit corporations at the expense of workers, and a triumph of ideology over science in policy making on the environment and medical research. All along, Americans’ civil liberties and the constitutional balance have been trampled by a president determined to assert ever more power.

    Now that the Democrats have taken Congress, Mr. Bush is acting as if he’d had the door to compromise open all along and the Democrats had refused to walk through it.

    Last night, Mr. Bush also acted as if he were really doing something to help the 47 million people in this country who don’t have health insurance. What he offered, by the White House’s own estimate, would take a few million off that scandalously high number and shift the burden to the states. Mr. Bush’s plan would put a new tax on Americans who were lucky enough to still have good health-care coverage through their employers. Some large portion of those are middle class and represented by the labor unions that Mr. Bush and the Republicans are dedicated to destroying.

    Mr. Bush’s comments on Iraq added nothing to his failed policies. He did, at last, propose a permanent increase in the size of the Army and Marines that would repair some of the damage he has done to those forces. But that would take years, and it would do nothing to halt Iraq’s spiral. Mr. Bush failed to explain how he would pay for a larger force, which would almost certainly require cutting budget-busting weapons programs. That would mean going up against the arms industry and its lobbyists — something Mr. Bush has never been willing to do.

    Mr. Bush almost certainly didn’t intend it, but his speech did reinforce one vital political fact — that it’s not just up to him anymore. There was a big change last night: the audience. Instead of solid Republican majorities marching in lock step with the White House, Congress is controlled by Democrats. It will be their task to give leadership to a nation that desperately wants change and expects its leaders to work together to deliver it. The Democrats’ challenge will be to form real coalitions with willing Republicans. If they do, Mr. Bush may even be forced, finally, to compromise.

    Say what you will about the flaws and shortcomings of the two-party system. After six years of the Bush presidency, at least we know it’s a lot better than the one-party system.

    .
     

Share This Page

LOGIN | REGISTER