Kind of, but we still had the choice two picks before Shelvin went and didn't pick him. Maybe we would have if we hadn't already gone with Barmore in the second, but it wouldn't have been the first time BB double dipped at a position that needed some help, and even with the FA additions there's room for youth and development on the DL. I'm not sure this was a Barmore vs. Shelvin situation in their eyes. Outside of the positions that are meant to take 100% of the snaps (like QB, K, etc), I have a hard time drawing strategy conclusions from players taken two rounds apart from one another.
Now, if Shelvin turns out really good and Stevenson doesn't, that's a legit second guess. But Barmore is his own thing in this scenario, IMO.