Ok cool. No, you’re not responsible for the virus. However, I’d probably see someone as soon as you can if I were you. You know, maybe a little CAT scan or something....I’m not a monster!
I did eat a fluorescent glowing sandwich at the Wuhan government lab though.
All I’ll say is back in April/May that 200k was considered the worst case scenario and we are certain to surpass that now after being under the impression that we were going to vastly outperform projectionsAll I can really say despite 160,000 deaths is thank God this virus isn't deadlier. A colossal failure on the part of Trump and his minions.
There is a new estimate that we will hit 300,000 deaths by the end of the year. I'm not sure I'd go that far but given the current trajectory 250,000 seems like a safe bet at least.All I’ll say is back in April/May that 200k was considered the worst case scenario and we are certain to surpass that now after being under the impression that we were going to vastly outperform projections
It looks like he was right and unsurprisingly you were wrong.The argument was mass had 30k deaths and 4 times larger Texas had 2k but he was arguing mass did a better job. The other poster argued that unless many thousands of people died in Texas that argument was wrong to which he essentially responded just give it time.
First of all the argument was at that time not a prediction of the future and secondly Texas has more than 4 times the population and the same numbers of deaths.