Sherman on the Way Out?

[Uptown]

The Super Bowl was his highlight. He not even worth a bag of balls now.

Lol agree. Just a joke though.

 

[RobertWeathers]

Lol agree. Just a joke though.

I was commenting just to comment. I figured with the you implied the Seahags paid dumb money to a stiff.

 

[PatsFan98117]

or ripped a guy’s chain off...

Funnily enough, Talib and the chain and Sherm's peak mouthiness involved the same guy.

As far as Crabtree being a top-20 NFL receiver, you’d have a hard time making that argument to me. There are a lot of receivers playing good ball out there, and Josh Gordon needed 14 games to produce almost double what Crabtree can do in a full season. And Gordon had Brandon Weeden, Brian Hoyer and Jason Campbell playing quarterback.

But that’s not why I don’t like the man. It goes back to something he said to me this offseason in Arizona, but you’d have to ask him about that. A lot of what I said to Andrews was adrenaline talking, and some of that was Crabtree. I just don’t like him.

‘To Those Who Would Call Me a Thug or Worse ...’

 

[Uptown]

I was commenting just to comment. I figured with the you implied the Seahags paid dumb money to a stiff.

Oh ok lol.

 

[aluminum seats]

Yeah, we can analyze the game however we like, but I cannot and will never get past the single worst coaching decision in BB's career. Everything else about that game is irrelevant to me.

Now I'm by no means saying the rest of the team played fine and has no need for upgrade; quite the opposite. But it does seem silly to overanalyze the Super Bowl when we all know exactly why we lost.

Yup. I suppose the bright side is that the helmet catch doesn't sting as much now by comparison. At least that was a football play.

 

[patsinthesnow]

I am not sure what person you were watching but it was definitely not Sherman in the slot. He is awful there because his strengths are definitely not emphasized there relative to being an outside CB.

Just a handful of plays from the 2016 game:







Sherman barely has a flaw in his game when healthy.

 

[Uptown]

Seahawks Likely To Release Richard Sherman Friday | NFLTradeRumors.com

 

[patsinthesnow]

He’s getting released tomorrow, is younger/better than Talib & likely cheaper due to injury. We can afford to let him heal up. Sherman was a better option than Talib IMO.

 

[PatriotsNumero1Fan]

He’s getting released tomorrow, is younger/better than Talib & likely cheaper due to injury. We can afford to let him heal up. Sherman was a better option than Talib IMO.

Well i am hoping we get on him quickly. It's about the right price.

 

[fightingirish595]

Wonder how much Sherman will get coming off that injury.

 

[PATSYLICIOUS]

This has gotta happen

 

[Todd Bradley]

Well with Talib gone, all eyes are now on Sherman.

 

[IcyPatriot]

I would rather have Sherman - would have been happy with Talib.

Still want to see a CB drafted before round 3 or 4 if possible.

 

[pctronics0072]

I think he may be out of our price range.

 

[VectorPrime]

I think he may be out of our price range.

He better not be.

 

[maust]

I would rather have Sherman - would have been happy with Talib.

Still want to see a CB drafted before round 3 or 4 if possible.

Outside of concerns about a CB coming off surgery on both Achilles I agree. My thinking is the injury concerns are going to see him released (possibly with an injury settlement) and coming here on a contract much like the one Revis had. It gives Sherman a chance to prove he's worth serious green off the injury and if the Pats draft a mid round CB he gets a chance to be brought along.

 

[rochrist]

After watching what a scrub did to this defense in the SuperBowl. They are a lot further away than a few players from being a dominant defense. Let's just focus on getting respectable. Being able to stand up to a CBA scrub like Foles.

Kinda tired of Foles being made out to be Geno Smith. He did have a 27TD 2INT season after all. That's a little more than pure luck.

 

[luuked]

But it does seem silly to overanalyze the Super Bowl when we all know exactly why we lost.

Because we turned the ball over essentially three times and the Eagles only once.

 

[supafly]

Because we turned the ball over essentially three times and the Eagles only once.

I think it’s because we played terrible defense, allowing Philly to convert 12/18 attempts on third or fourth down. Those situations were game changers.

Just the fact that they had 18 opportunities is terribly disturbing.

 

[maineman209]

I think it’s because we played terrible defense, allowing Philly to convert 12/18 attempts on third or fourth down. Those situations were game changers.

Just the fact that they had 18 opportunities is terribly disturbing.

OTOH, if an offense doesn't get many 3rd-down "opportunities", it may mean that they simply didn't need a full three downs to get a first down very often. That can also indicate poor defense.