Argument A-Unprecedented, historic corruption: an American president commutes the sentence of a person convicted by a jury of lying to shield that very president. Argument B-Overzealous prosecutors” who convicted Mr. Stone on “process-based charges” stemming from the “witch hunts” and “Russia hoax” investigation. Previously AG Barr said this about Roger Stone. "I think the prosecution was righteous and I think the sentence the judge ultimately gave was fair," Barr said in an interview with ABC News. How do we American's see this?