- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Messages
- 16,342
- Reaction score
- 7,623
No...but I do think it's reasonable to assert that his actions have invited considerable mockery.Is anyone actually asking anyone to feel sorry for him?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.No...but I do think it's reasonable to assert that his actions have invited considerable mockery.Is anyone actually asking anyone to feel sorry for him?
Normally, I don't revel in others' misfortunes (excepting Goodell and the Jete). But I find myself happy this happened.....and hires a dive team to recover it.
Divers search lake for Julio Jones' lost $100,000 diamond earring
"Bobby Griffin, the self-described “Scubaman” of Lake Lanier in Gainesville, Georgia, was hoping he and local salvage diver Richard Pickering would be able to successfully recover Jones’ earring. Unfortunately, Pickering now believes it’s a lost cause, considering the piece of jewelry is likely down about 65 feet in the man-made lake."
Guess Scubaman had no luck and Julio should be thankful its was just his earring and not his SB rin......I mean yeah. He doesn't have to worry about that.
LOL... Jesus.Is anyone actually asking anyone to feel sorry for him?
LOL... Jesus.
No...but I do think it's reasonable to assert that his actions have invited considerable mockery.
Yeah, insurance won't cover "lost" jewellery. The fish would have to steal it in this story....which is why he took a shot to try and recover it.Pretty sure this is why they have insurance, but yeah, if I'm a millionaire I'd probably pay someone to go and look for it, too.
Just seems like one of those strawman situations. We say we don't care but the need to assert such a thing proves otherwise.
This thread is probably another reason why it's great that Training Camp is finally underway...No argument here. It's a pretty silly situation. I just think it's even sillier when everyone comes here to say "well, actually, I don't care one bit about this" when in reality, no one could give a **** about Julio or his damn earring. It's not a novel thought.
No. You're wrong. If you get a Jewelry Rider on your policy, list and document the jewelry (receipts and pictures) and, depending on the circumstances, file a report with local police that it has been lost but presumably not stolen, if your policy covers it and you pay a high enough Premium, insurance will cover the loss (probably with a hefty deductible). Depending on the amount, the Insurance Company might have their own investigators look into it.Yeah, insurance won't cover "lost" jewellery. The fish would have to steal it in this story....which is why he took a shot to try and recover it.
But he didn't because he's looking.No. You're wrong. If you get a Jewelry Rider on your policy, list and document the jewelry (receipts and pictures) and, depending on the circumstances, file a report with local police that it has been lost but presumably not stolen, if your policy covers it and you pay a high enough Premium, insurance will cover the loss (probably with a hefty deductible). Depending on the amount, the Insurance Company might have their own investigators look into it.
If the Insurer is satisfied that it isn't fraudulent, they will pay, but they might raise your premium. If they conclude that it's likely but not provable Fraud, they will probably pay and pull the Rider (lots of small print in those policies ).
No. You're wrong. If you get a Jewelry Rider on your policy, list and document the jewelry (receipts and pictures) and, depending on the circumstances, file a report with local police that it has been lost but presumably not stolen, if your policy covers it and you pay a high enough Premium, insurance will cover the loss (probably with a hefty deductible). Depending on the amount, the Insurance Company might have their own investigators look into it.
If the Insurer is satisfied that it isn't fraudulent, they will pay, but they might raise your premium. If they conclude that it's likely but not provable Fraud, they will probably pay and pull the Rider (lots of small print in those policies ).
So theoretically someone could wind up flushing a 100,000 dollar earring down their toilet.Money down the drain so to speak.
Lake Lanier supplies Atlanta with water.
And he'll never have to work a day in his life ever again. The exchange rate for sea currency is ridiculous!On the upside some lucky fish found it and after giving it to his wife fish is getting laid tonight for sure.... so there's that.
Man can you imagine fishing up a nice bass or something, only to find it's got a 100k diamond pierced in its fin?On the upside some lucky fish found it and after giving it to his wife fish is getting laid tonight for sure.... so there's that.
Agree. The wife's engagement ring is insured even to the point that if the center stone falls out and is lost it's covered. I'm sure the insurance company has plenty of hoops to jump through if you have a claim but having something that valuable uninsured is just dumb. The premiums aren't even really that expensive. We have $30k of coverage and its only about $25 a month.
Are you serious? If my wife loses her engagement ring, we can't claim it under our homeowner's insurance?Yeah, insurance won't cover "lost" jewellery. The fish would have to steal it in this story....which is why he took a shot to try and recover it.
Consult the policy or your agent to be sure.Are you serious? If my wife loses her engagement ring, we can't claim it under our homeowner's insurance?