Patriots Local Newsfeed:

SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:MASSLive


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:CBS Boston


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:CSNNE

Patsfans.com

Upcoming Opponent:
Next Up: Jaguars
Thu
Aug 10th
Right Now At PatsFans.com:
Second Year Leap?
As OTAs get set to begin, Steve Balestrieri looks at several players that he believes will make the second-year leap this season.

Current Patriots Twitter Feed:

Non political question: Will Donald Trump imprison gay football players?

Discussion in 'The Practice Squad' started by fnordcircle, Nov 9, 2016.

  1. meatface

    meatface In the Starting Line-Up

    damn that whole checks and balances thing, doing what its supposed to.
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  2. YOUGOTMOSSED

    YOUGOTMOSSED In the Starting Line-Up

    In theory, a judge is suppose to follow the law, not re-write it to suit his own politics. It was crystal clear that Trump was legally authorized to issue a travel ban and the court had zero authority to overturn it.

    That's not "checks and balances", it's abuse of authority at best, usurpation/treason at worst.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. meatface

    meatface In the Starting Line-Up

    this isnt a political forum but he has no constitutional basis and obviously several judges think that Judicial over site is a thing and you thinking it doesnt exist doesnt make it so. If the Trump camp had an argument for why they have the right to impose this type of arbitrary ban they would use it but instead they are seemingly trying to argue that Judges shouldn't have a role in telling the president what the executive branch has the right to do which they certainly wern't arguing when Obama was president.
     
  4. YOUGOTMOSSED

    YOUGOTMOSSED In the Starting Line-Up

    I don't think you understand the difference between "judicial oversight" and "judicial activism" but, don't worry, most people don't. Suffice it to say that there is a federal statute that been on the books since the 50's that says this is the president's call. Ignoring the statute/law is a dereliction of duty showing that the judge is a politician and not a jurist.

    Speaking of ignoring . . . buh-bye.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. PatsWickedPissah

    PatsWickedPissah PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Only a Simpleton could misconstrue (look the word up) this
     
  6. Simpelton

    Simpelton Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    I feel invited to comment.

    And just to correct the record, I had no trouble figuring out that such an... ecclectic post was not made with a straight face.
     

Share This Page

LOGIN | REGISTER