Patriots Local Newsfeed:

SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com


SOURCE:MASSLive


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:MASSLive


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:MASSLive


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:Providence Journal


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:MASSLive


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald

Patsfans.com


Upcoming Opponent:
Next Up: Steelers
Sun
Jan 22nd
Right Now At PatsFans.com:
Key Match-Ups
Steve Balestrieri takes a look at this weekend's match-ups and believes the Patriots receivers should have their way against Pittsburgh's secondary.


Current Patriots Twitter Feed:

@PatsFanFotoShop Can't fire owners, unfortunately. Dysfunction often starts at the top.

RT @WarrenKZola: In 2016 the NFL saw the following go UNDRAFTED: 1) 30 of 107 underclassmen 2) 20 of 101 Sr Bowl attendees 3) 37 Scouting…

RT @TheRealPodVader: Subscribe for #NFL coverage of Championship games. @WilliamsonNFL @chatham58 & SuperFans: https://t.co/FWxG1DXgnt http…

Le'Veon Bell is going to get his touches and yards. How can the Patriots minimize his impact? https://t.co/NVz6eck2yw

RT @PhilAPerry: How might the Patriots try to limit Antonio Brown's big-play ability? Malcolm Butler could be the key once again.

How might the Patriots try to limit Antonio Brown's big-play ability? Malcolm Butler could be the key once again. https://t.co/xKKyVVpCIr

@cynicalpuss Science is hard. But it works the same in Indy as it does in NE as it does in Dallas as it does in CA...u should have it by now

RT @RyanHannable: To that point, in Week 7 matchup Patriots had most success on defense when they had 7-8 in box. Key player: Patrick Chung.

RT @RyanHannable: Rewatched some of KC-Pitt from last Sunday: Ben Roethlisberger made some bad throws. Pats' best bet is to crowd box, focu…

Be surprised if Edelman/Solder are not extended during the 2017 season. Was wrong about Hightower so my track record on this is shaky😄

@bradynichols85 ahhh...shoot. looked at his profootballref page, saw 2g this season, assumed he was hurt. thanks

In descending order 1.) restructure 2.) paycut 3.) trade 4.) retirement https://t.co/llPHJ9i37h

To that point, in Week 7 matchup Patriots had most success on defense when they had 7-8 in box. Key player: Patrick Chung.

Another current #Colts player here 👇🏽 The postmortem stories on Grigson are going to be good reading https://t.co/ghbVBrbcx9

Rewatched some of KC-Pitt from last Sunday: Ben Roethlisberger made some bad throws. Pats' best bet is to crowd box, focus on stopping Bell

Packers have signed WR Max McCaffrey to active roster from the practice squad and placed C/G JC Tretter on injured reserve.

Kelce hit Steelers early last weekend. Pitt in cover 3. Shazier either gets caught eyeballing Smith or a brain free… https://t.co/qaE2QCgP8q

@RocheSmoke Yes, sir. Believe that as well Jordan ... er...Ryan. LOL.

@jricci_rich77 While sound in theory, no-name special teamers critical (think Philly game last year with blocked punt etc.). Won't happen.

Confident that veteran deals will include 46-man active roster bonuses.

@HendersonChef Not sure I'd put it in no-brainer category, but agree that's the likely scenario.

@stephenkurucz Feel the same way, Stephen. Curious if Bill Belichick sees it the same way.

RT @ProFootballTalk: Bill Belichick is going for postseason win No. 25 tomorrow. No other coach in NFL history has more than 20 https://t.c…

@NYPatsFan21 Concur with that Lady Brady. Curious if Bill Belichick sees it the same way.

@_karlrademacher Hi Karl. Hard for me to agree after watching Floyd in regular-season finale. But agree he's choice if everyone's healthy.


Good news on Woodhead

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Patspsycho, Oct 4, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Patspsycho

    Patspsycho Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    9,925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    No tear or breaks in his ankle, per Rapaport tweet. That makes it a grade 1 sprain.
     
  2. PatsWickedPissah

    PatsWickedPissah PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    29,260
    Likes Received:
    3,265
    Ratings:
    +14,778
    Little kids heal fast!
     
  3. Mack Herron

    Mack Herron PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,676
    Likes Received:
    1,720
    Ratings:
    +7,046
    Still not certain to play vs Jets. If he can't go, who takes his spot on third down? If BJGE, would sacrifice receiving threat and elusiveness. We may see if Ridley is deemed a reliable blocker.
     
  4. NEPatriot

    NEPatriot Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    7,836
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +11
    I wonder if we see him Sunday. An ankle sprain, ever a minor one, doesn't sound good for a RB, especially a shifty one like Woodhead. Let him rest and we'll see him after the bye week. I have to admit that I'd like to see Vereen.
     
  5. RxJock1120

    RxJock1120 Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    Messages:
    1,192
    Likes Received:
    154
    Ratings:
    +557
    Any chance Vereen finally starts earning his paycheck?!
     
  6. shmessy

    shmessy . PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    25,898
    Likes Received:
    4,915
    Ratings:
    +16,885
    Let the Vereen Era begin!!!!!

    I'm excited to finally see the guy picked ahead of Ridley play.

    .....but still want Woody to get well FAST!
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2011
  7. Bella*chick

    Bella*chick Addicted to the light

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,847
    Likes Received:
    916
    Ratings:
    +4,074
    I was hoping it was just a sprain. Good news.
     
  8. Mack Herron

    Mack Herron PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,676
    Likes Received:
    1,720
    Ratings:
    +7,046
    everyone wants to see him, but his first look will not be as Brady's bodyguard in a divisional game vs Jets. I think BJGE because #1 gotta be a reliable blocker. Now, if that's the case, I would not be surprised to see Vereen get his feet wet on first or second down. He will almost certainly dress again.
     
  9. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    24,891
    Likes Received:
    694
    Ratings:
    +2,742
    If a player is our #4 running back, then when we have more healthy players than recently, Vareen won't even be active. He is in the same situation as Price.

    I am NOT anxious to see one of our top three running backs be injured for a few weeks so Vareen can play. I am not anxious to see one of our top 3 wide receivers injured for a few weeks so that Price can play.

    I like what I see in Green-Ellis, Ridley and Woodhead. They are a top 10 running offense. I don't know why someone would want to reduce their reps so that a #4 can play. I can understand why we might want all three of our top 3 running backs to get more reps, in place of some the passing plays.
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2011
  10. shmessy

    shmessy . PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    25,898
    Likes Received:
    4,915
    Ratings:
    +16,885
    Really?

    I thought Vereen dressed for the Oakland game last week.

    Why wouldn't he dress again, given Woodhead's diminished capacity versus last week?

    I, too, would prefer Woodhead be healthy and 100%. But if he isn't, it's nice to see a backup little guy whom we drafted in the 2nd round get his first looks.
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2011
  11. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    24,891
    Likes Received:
    694
    Ratings:
    +2,742
    And how many carries did Vareen have? How many receptions did Price have?

    These guys were active because we had no one else to activate.

     
  12. shmessy

    shmessy . PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    25,898
    Likes Received:
    4,915
    Ratings:
    +16,885
    You had written:
    ---------------------------

    "If a player is our #4 running back, then when we have more healthy players than recently, Vareen won't even be active. He is in the same situation as Price.

    I am NOT anxious to see one of our top three running backs be injured for a few weeks so Vareen can play. I am not anxious to see one of our top 3 wide receivers injured for a few weeks so that Price can play.

    I like what I see in Green-Ellis, Ridley and Woodhead. They are a top 10 running offense. I don't know why someone would want to reduce their reps so that a #4 can play. I can understand why we might want all three of our top 3 running backs to get more reps, in place of some the passing plays."

    ------------------------------

    I was writing assuming that Woodhead is INJURED for the next game (he wasn't last week). That is a material difference. So why wouldn't Vereen be called upon more than last week (in which he WAS active, but didn't play) if Woodhead is in civvies?

    If Woodhead is inactive this week, Vereen will be the #3. There is a better chance he sees action versus last week. He certainly will get more reps in practice than he did last week and, therefore, more likely to see action.

    Let's see how Faulk comes back after Week 6. In the meantime, I'm loving the running back depth.

    You wrote "When we have more healthy players than recently....." Wow, that's an optimsitic assumption given the long season and the toll it tends to take as we get deeper into it.

    What's so hard about that?
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2011
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

LOGIN | REGISTER