Patriots Local Newsfeed:

SOURCE:Providence Journal


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:Boston Sports Journal


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Sports Journal


SOURCE:Boston Sports Journal


SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:Boston Sports Journal


SOURCE:MASSLive


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com


SOURCE:Boston Sports Journal


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE

Patsfans.com


Upcoming Opponent:
Next Up: Lions
Fri
Aug 25th
Right Now At PatsFans.com:
Tough Night
It was a rough night for Jimmy Garoppolo, who made a key mistake on his final pass of the night that proved to be the difference as the Patriots lost 27-23 in Houston.


Current Patriots Twitter Feed:

Good news on Woodhead

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Patspsycho, Oct 4, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Patspsycho

    Patspsycho Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    9,925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    No tear or breaks in his ankle, per Rapaport tweet. That makes it a grade 1 sprain.
     

  2. PatsWickedPissah

    PatsWickedPissah PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    29,962
    Likes Received:
    3,695
    Ratings:
    +16,894
    Little kids heal fast!
     
  3. Mack Herron

    Mack Herron PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,872
    Likes Received:
    1,895
    Ratings:
    +7,535
    Still not certain to play vs Jets. If he can't go, who takes his spot on third down? If BJGE, would sacrifice receiving threat and elusiveness. We may see if Ridley is deemed a reliable blocker.
     
  4. NEPatriot

    NEPatriot Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    7,836
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +11
    I wonder if we see him Sunday. An ankle sprain, ever a minor one, doesn't sound good for a RB, especially a shifty one like Woodhead. Let him rest and we'll see him after the bye week. I have to admit that I'd like to see Vereen.
     
  5. RxJock1120

    RxJock1120 Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    Messages:
    1,206
    Likes Received:
    157
    Ratings:
    +574
    Any chance Vereen finally starts earning his paycheck?!
     
  6. shmessy

    shmessy . PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    26,733
    Likes Received:
    5,484
    Ratings:
    +19,124
    Let the Vereen Era begin!!!!!

    I'm excited to finally see the guy picked ahead of Ridley play.

    .....but still want Woody to get well FAST!
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2011
  7. Bella*chick

    Bella*chick Addicted to the light

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,987
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Ratings:
    +4,505
    I was hoping it was just a sprain. Good news.
     
  8. Mack Herron

    Mack Herron PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,872
    Likes Received:
    1,895
    Ratings:
    +7,535
    everyone wants to see him, but his first look will not be as Brady's bodyguard in a divisional game vs Jets. I think BJGE because #1 gotta be a reliable blocker. Now, if that's the case, I would not be surprised to see Vereen get his feet wet on first or second down. He will almost certainly dress again.
     
  9. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    25,397
    Likes Received:
    828
    Ratings:
    +3,241
    If a player is our #4 running back, then when we have more healthy players than recently, Vareen won't even be active. He is in the same situation as Price.

    I am NOT anxious to see one of our top three running backs be injured for a few weeks so Vareen can play. I am not anxious to see one of our top 3 wide receivers injured for a few weeks so that Price can play.

    I like what I see in Green-Ellis, Ridley and Woodhead. They are a top 10 running offense. I don't know why someone would want to reduce their reps so that a #4 can play. I can understand why we might want all three of our top 3 running backs to get more reps, in place of some the passing plays.
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2011
  10. shmessy

    shmessy . PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    26,733
    Likes Received:
    5,484
    Ratings:
    +19,124
    Really?

    I thought Vereen dressed for the Oakland game last week.

    Why wouldn't he dress again, given Woodhead's diminished capacity versus last week?

    I, too, would prefer Woodhead be healthy and 100%. But if he isn't, it's nice to see a backup little guy whom we drafted in the 2nd round get his first looks.
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2011
  11. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    25,397
    Likes Received:
    828
    Ratings:
    +3,241
    And how many carries did Vareen have? How many receptions did Price have?

    These guys were active because we had no one else to activate.

     
  12. shmessy

    shmessy . PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    26,733
    Likes Received:
    5,484
    Ratings:
    +19,124
    You had written:
    ---------------------------

    "If a player is our #4 running back, then when we have more healthy players than recently, Vareen won't even be active. He is in the same situation as Price.

    I am NOT anxious to see one of our top three running backs be injured for a few weeks so Vareen can play. I am not anxious to see one of our top 3 wide receivers injured for a few weeks so that Price can play.

    I like what I see in Green-Ellis, Ridley and Woodhead. They are a top 10 running offense. I don't know why someone would want to reduce their reps so that a #4 can play. I can understand why we might want all three of our top 3 running backs to get more reps, in place of some the passing plays."

    ------------------------------

    I was writing assuming that Woodhead is INJURED for the next game (he wasn't last week). That is a material difference. So why wouldn't Vereen be called upon more than last week (in which he WAS active, but didn't play) if Woodhead is in civvies?

    If Woodhead is inactive this week, Vereen will be the #3. There is a better chance he sees action versus last week. He certainly will get more reps in practice than he did last week and, therefore, more likely to see action.

    Let's see how Faulk comes back after Week 6. In the meantime, I'm loving the running back depth.

    You wrote "When we have more healthy players than recently....." Wow, that's an optimsitic assumption given the long season and the toll it tends to take as we get deeper into it.

    What's so hard about that?
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2011
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

LOGIN | REGISTER