Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Quest4SevenHomie, Sep 6, 2019.
And...Our owner was videotaped getting a happy ending at a AMP.
This is a debate that has been waged throughout human history with many taking up your line of thinking and just as many taking up mine. It's a debate that probably won't come to any satisfying conclusion in our lifetime.
It's really the fundamental philosophical question relating to human morality. At one point, nobody considered murder to be immoral because the idea of morality didn't even exist at one point in human development.
But I'm willing to agree to disagree, as this is something we could discuss for eternity and not necessarily come to full agreement.
Does it really mater when the videos were taken? What matter is that she was half naked sitting on the same bed as AB. Proves she's a lying tart.
He’s basically just a television character. He must be loving this AB stuff.
I’ve made plenty of points that directly address his posts. There is no counter argument to thoughts like “millions upon millions of transgression upon the the oppressed” because it’s not only an invalid point, it’s wrong on many levels
Justice only deals with the present facts unless there’s a legal precedent that is relevant.
You offered nothing in your post other than support for the oppressive poster.
Got a speeding ticket.
You're right. String him up.
The balcony thing was investigated by the league and no action was taken.
Technically, no Goodell doesn't need a reason, but I'm 1000% sure he doesn't want this precedent.
Unless there is substantial evidence that we're not currently privy to, nothing's going to happen.
But by all means, keep trolling with your Felger takes. They're scorching hot.
It is but the lion lacks the intelligent thought necessary to understand that.
Of course it was.
I don’t think you are clear on the meaning of immoral.
As expected, he’s not answering any of the questions? Or he’s not answering any of the questions as expected?
Inside look by Matt Cassel.
Cassel: Here's how Pats will handle AB saga
The headline will be: Tom Brady SLAMs Antonio Brown over rape allegations
If I remember he's from Wisconsin? He's a Green Bay fan at heart? Must drive him nuts how the two legends of GB won so little compared to the team he now covers in NE.
The only writers more delusional and more wrong about BB and the Patriots over the last 2 decades are Ron "Plagiarist" Borges and Dan "Shank" Shaughnessy. Two dinosaurs who used to hold sway over NE sports dialogue but have been irrelevant for 20 years and counting and who have been woefully wrong over and over again. Borges seems to have disappeared after having 6 championships shoved down his gullet and Shaughnessy is more miserable and angry than ever. Heard him the other day and the disdain for the Patriots success is beyond palpable. I think also he is jealous as a Red Sox "journalist" first and his beloved heroes of the past have all been lapped several times over by BB and TB12 in Boston sports lore.
That is a mischaracterization of Eddard's approach on here, IMO, given that he has stated multiple times that others are welcome to hold whatever opinions/reach whatever conclusions they please.
Yes. Any thought that sprung from that evolution did so arbitrarily. There was no morality, then there was. It didn't exist from the beginning of time, unless you believe in intelligent design, which I don't. Anyone who does will surely disagree with me and that's valid.
Take these for what their worth but apparently that’s the accuser. If you click the tweet it loads more videos of the two of them.
True, but without the morality component you're left with an especially meaningless statement. On par with learning that someone got in a car accident and stating that statistically, if he hadn't been on the road that wouldn't have happened.
Reporters are definitely kinder to TB than they are to BB. They asked a few questions about AB, he said he's not talking about his situation and that's that.
I simply stated one of the reasons for the state of the world in this context, I never once suggested I agree with it.
In fact, I went out of my way to assert that I *don't* agree with its validity. But the fact remains that it's the reasoning being used by many.
Yes, it does matter. Like I said, if this happened after she insisted he sign that paper, then her whole story is undercut. But if it happened before she made an issue of his advances, then you can't read too much into it. I mean, clearly there was a point when she made it known that she didn't want him doing what he did on her back, or else there wouldn't be texts from AB in the claim to that effect.
Your about 8 pages behind on these vids.
Separate names with a comma.