seriously?
as a WR you can win basically with your athelticism and route running only, the more gifted you are the easier you will transfer from college to NFL, a QB not only has to know and understand what his entire O (all 11 of them) is supposed to do on the field BUT has to understand what the D (all of them not only one CB/FS) are throwing at him, he has to be able to call protections and change them, he has to process everything in milliseconds and make the right call while he is been chased down by 4-5 280lbs rushers, there is a huge difference between what O and D do in college and what the best few hundred players and coaches do in the NFL on both sides of the ball (same is valid for Receivers as well for sure but yet again only by your talent you can immedialty make an impact if you have a proper QB that can throw you the ball)
as QB you cannot accelarate as rookie only based on your athleticism and fast feet since it takes way more to be good at the QB position than as a WR
than of course the importance of the position is different, if your QB ****s his bad the team is ****ed up, if your WR out of 3-4 WR/TEs per play ****s his bad and runs the wrong route the team is not ****ed up that much because the QB can go to other options instantly
Chase is great I don't mind him winning OROY, I am also pretty sure that Mac would have even better numbers with such WRs Cincy has than what he's got in NE
Give me examples.
i watch first take and listen to podcasts too.
you’re repeating stuff you’ve heard on tv.
take a play or interview from a wr and qbs respective points of view… and tell me how their critical thinking differs. Tell me the level of analysis (and not just rote memorization) either has to employ for success? Which one doesn’t anticipate the types of coverage on different levels? Which one doesn’t know or anticipate audibles based on what’s seen? Sure the scope and responsibilities are higher for a qb, but a receiver has route trees and a level of freedom/creativity to employ. They must make decisions on the fly based on who is perceived to be where. That’s also where coaching comes in but an intelligent player has to be perceptive of that to an extent. “If so and so bites on or moves to this, do that.” The qb identifies the mike in order to warn teammates so that they can adjust accordingly. That requires critical thinking all around.
or give me first hand experiences.
wrs are not just dogs. The qb executes a great deal but that doesn’t necessarily require or indicate any level of relative intelligence
is qb play more impactful? Probably. But the variance is high and relative to other positions it’s highly overrated.
making one man the identity of the team is not only easy for the involvement of dumber fans who can’t be bothered with minutia, it’s also more profitable from a marketing standpoint. “BRADY v MAHHOMMES” gets more eyeballs on documentaries, espn shows, ticket ads, forum posts, merchandise, etc… than “WEST COAST OFFENSE v MAN”… or what have you.
its an important position. I promise you, we get it. But it’s overrated.
The move towards todays ref philosophy is as lame as the 3-pt trend in the nba, and it’s a microcosm of consumerist culture, and exploitative.
also ALSO… it’s fun as a kid to see yourself in the qbs shoes. There’s a bit of that too.
“fOoTbAlL iS tHe UlTiMaTe TeAm SpOrT”… ok… so why does every goddamn thing have to be about the qb?
christ.