Think of sports as rewards for countries with effective leadership and citizens who are capable of responsible collective action. Unfortunately,...
Nah. The article wasn’t partisan, you were wrong, that’s pretty much all there is to it.
Well, now you're just lying. Not only haven't you proven it, you haven't even made an attempt at doing so.
Great! My opinion is that you're...
It isn't, though. I've given you multiple opportunities to prove your claim and you've opted not to do so.
They are but opinions are not.
Of course it was. You erroneously labeled his article as something it wasn't, so you could dismiss it rather than respond with substance. Which is...
OK, so you admit it.
OK, so you didn't read the article, either.
If you had, you would have known that it was titled "America’s most...
You've still not demonstrated that the article is partisan. Moreover, partisan is not synonymous with untrue. It's just attacking the messenger to...
You didn't, though. You resorted to an ad hom to avoid a substantive response. You may not have lobbed personal insults but the practical effect...
Thanks for proving my point.
Full disclosure: I haven't read the entirety of this Dumpster fire of a thread, but where did IC say the article was partisan?
Of course you...
You went ad hom and dismissed the article instead of addressing the point(s) therein. Very consistent, yes.
Literally one page later.
Don’t worry, once the Pats win a game or two you won’t be seeing him again.
So is this the COVID thread now or what
WWE has you covered.
I thought that was one of the enumerated principles of message board posting :p
Very well, I shall respect your authoritah.
Today's routine brought to you by the Dane Cook School of Comedy
Well...they are the Bears.
Don't ever recall you being such a chud. Xoxo.
Separate names with a comma.