General impression by whom? Skip Bayless? Nick Wright? Felger? Fauria? Mary from Topeka, KS?
You and Biffins are so caught up in what the world thinks and their outside assessment of Dynasty 1, Dynasty 2, BB, TB12, etc it's crazy.
WHO CARES?
The only perceptions I care about and give legitimate consideration to are those emanating from knowledgeable, incorruptible, resilient, long-standing Patriots fans and my own.
Everyone else.......I don't care WTF they think.
At what point did I say I cared about what "the world thinks"? People have their impressions, acknowledging they exist isn't the same as caring about them. You asked a question. I answered it.
Everyone is inherently invested in their own perspective, it goes without saying. And most people are inclined to defend their perspective. You're doing it with every post. You're doing it when you say you don't care about any perspective that doesn't fit into that exceptionally narrow criteria that probably excludes everyone other than the last person you reference. Meaning, you're only really convinced that your own perspective is reliable enough for consideration.
Most people are really stubborn and would rather argue a point than concede it. Just for the sake of it. I think this explains a portion of Team Belichick. Not necessarily you but for example...
The problem is Malcolm was not mentally ready to play the game. Can't put players out there that aren't ready. Bill had no choice but to sit him.
The Butler benching is the easiest thing a Belichick detractor can point to. It's just too obvious. The guy played nearly 100% of the defensive snaps for 3 straight years. He was in uniform on the sideline. He played in the game, just not on defense. He never said he couldn't play in the game. In fact he said he could have changed the outcome. If you want to argue Butler wouldn't have made a difference in the outcome then that's one thing but saying he was complicit in his own benching is ridiculous.
Let's keep it real... Butler was a better option than Jordan Richards. Which was plenty obvious by halftime. By the fourth quarter. Belichick had a choice... he had an active player at his disposal and he chose not to deploy him despite the alternatives failing miserably. I really don't believe any of that is disputable. That Belichick did it out of personal animus, and not in the genuine best interests of the team, is speculative, but I believe that too.
You have so much wrong here.
The success is as much belichicks as it is Brady’s. You can’t take the success away because it coincided with Brady being here unless you take away coaching credit for any winning coach who had good players.
Secondly you want to look at belichicks career without Brady and ignore context. He took over a terrible team in Cleveland and had to rebuild it without free agency. He did, made them a playoff team and has the rug pulled out from under him when the owner moved.
In New England you want to count the year he took over an awful team with severe cap problems and cleaned house and then not count the fruits of that. Then you want to count a season with a qb who had not started a game since high school and they went 11-5. Finally you want to count only the year after the cap caught up to the dynasty. It’s a ridiculous take. Let’s eliminate everything that is good and assess a guy on what’s left and give him no credit for leading the greatest dynasty ever.
How about this. Let’s eliminate Brady’s completions and only count his incompletions and interceptions. So we conclude he ducks and was only successful because of his receivers.
Guess what. I just reduced Brady’s career to about 35% of what is it was. Unfair? You are reducing belichicks to 29% of his.
What I truly don’t understand though is why a Patriot fan, after all of the success we have been gifted, would feel any need at all to trash any participant in that success. As a fan you were handed success you don’t deserve. Instead of appreciating it you spend your free time trying to knock down the architect of it.
Can you explain why?
Firstly, Belichick wasn't successful in Cleveland. Unless you consider 1 playoff appearance and 1 playoff win in 5 seasons a success. Which if you do then I probably should just stop now.
Look, I'm not eliminating everything Belichick did in the plus column throughout the course of the dynasty. Obviously over the course of 20 seasons he did some good things that contributed to the team's success. But 1) Brady did more, perhaps a lot more, 2) Belichick made some incredible mistakes along the way that changed the outcome of entire seasons...2015 and 2017, and 3) Belichick hastened the demise of the dynasty by a) failing to surround Brady with enough talent, b) fostering a poor relationship with Brady and c) letting Brady go with d) no adequate backup plan.