Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Thanks. I’m sure you have a nice and dumpy build every other paper-pusher attorney out there. I might start calling you “Pudge.”
WTF planet are you living on where "Manning performed in the postseason for his second team"? He f'ing sucked and sucked royally, but got carried to a title.
Is Belichick 12 games or 13 games under .500 without Brady starting? I lost track over the past month.
Didn’t something similar happen back in theday to Bruschi? He got his leg bent back and looked like Gumby, but ended up being ok.
What a sick burn. ****in’ dork. You’re probably built like Oswald Cobblepot, doing some all-star attorney’s grunt work for 60 hours a week while you destroy your body with overpriced fast food bought off DoorDash because you have absolutely no life whatsoever.
Rhodes was the real MVP of that Super Bowl.
He was 5-3, 11 TD's, 6 INT's. If Brady performed like that, you would spend the rest of your life talking about how horrible he was.
I wanted the Cowboys first as that team was loaded and would've been a ratings bonanza! Green Bay was 2nd as they were a better matchup for the Pats offense and Brett Favre vs Brady sounds a lot better than Eli vs Brady.
You could make a strong case they'd have one more than the Pats had Bill not won the Football Lottery with Brady. They don't make the playoffs with a healthy Bledsoe or Huard and you could argue Bill doesn't make it past 2003.
LOL!! Guess I hurt your feelings with that one!! The correct answer is 12. 12 games under .500 without Brady.
I don’t think Bill makes it past 2002 without Brady. 2001 was looking a lot like 2000 and we all know what happened in 2002, even with Brady. Mo Lewis did Bill a massive favor.
That's what I actually meant. 2002 would've been his last season. And I was just thinking about the 2002 team the other day, it would've been a disaster without Brady.
Favre and the late 90's Packers will always be a disappointment. Should've won in '97 (As good as the Broncos were, they had no business beating them) and underachieved in '98. Holmgren and Wolf leaving was the beginning of their downfall.
I dunno. I remember thinking that Belichick probably would have made.the switch anyway during the season if Bledsoe never got hurt. He played bad the year before and lost the 2 games he started in 01. I watched Brady in the preseason games and he lit it up and replaced Huard as the backup. A couple.more. losses under Bledsoe and I thinks it's very plausible that Belichick sits Drew.
You live on this thread constantly bashing Brady and saying if he doesn't win the SB he's a failure but here you are bragging about finishing third on an online pick-em contest?
