PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

NFL Network suspends Ian Rapoport for tweeting about his ball shaving


Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought we were clamping down on politics in here, but this thread is currently being dominated by the same ******** from the same people as always.
 
I thought we were clamping down on politics in here, but this thread is currently being dominated by the same ******** from the same people as always.
Which people? Start naming and maiming them!
 
The OP, or Joker's response?
The OP was clear as day, Rapaport is proud of his hairless chihuahua look. Good on him.

As for the suspension, it seems there’s a policy with the NFL or NFLN and he failed to get clearance. At least one NFL player (Gronk) did a commercial for the gadget and didn’t get suspended, so clearly, it is or was allowed.

I personally find the suspension too long but I don’t have any information on Rapaport’s work history or how consistently this rule has been applied to other employees.
 
Last edited:
and Social Justice Moron Nation goes wild with 26 gendered ecstasy...Bruce Jennifer was quoted saying "he's a disgusting toad of a man who should be castrated and hung by his ankles over a boiling hot steam vent" while the face that stopped a million clocks, Joyless "Manface" Behar called for a nationwide boycott and month long penitential march against "Manspeak!"....meanwhile, the HEAD of NFLN, Roger "Hi I'm severely re-tarded" Goondell continues on with his 14 year long organized criminal conspiracy. Yeah,Ian Rapoport..outrageous...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....
Here here, well said. what ever it was you were trying to say. :p
 
I feel like I need Google translate and a hit of acid to understand this statement.
Remember, there’s a warning out about the brown acid. Might want to stay away from it.
 
@Joker killed it. He was on a roll early on. Thread can get locked now. Nobody is outdoing that. How dare you even try. LMFAOOOO at “the face that stopped a million clocks.”
 
The OP was clear as day, Rapaport is proud of his hairless chihuahua look. Good on him.

As for the suspension, it seems there’s a policy with the NFL or NFLN and he failed to get clearance. At least one NFL player (Gronk) did a commercial for the gadget and didn’t get suspended, so clearly, it is or was allowed.

I personally find the suspension too long but I don’t have any information on Rapaport’s work history or how consistently this rule has been applied to other employees.
Rappaport works for the league. No CBA. Gronk is contracted to a team, under the CBA. The league can control their employees, not so much players covered by the CBA.
 
Gronk/gf commercial is cringeworthy, but they made a lot of money from it so good for him
 
Oh you actually think the corrupt 32 and NYJFL* care about social justice?
I'm not sure my post said that.

I did suggest that NFL Network does care about its employees discussing the products of a firm that is not an NFL advertiser.

I do think NFL is making a mistake publicly slapping down a very prominent employee over they way they used social media.

Publicly demonstrating that their employees need NFL approval of their posts is a bad look, IMO.
 
Last edited:
But the tight end of the Tampa bay bucs is in a manscaped commercial looking for his balls. Im confused why they would be against this.


I wonder what's Gronk's preference. Manscaped trimmer, razor, waxing, sugar waxing, tweezer, electrolysis, laser. Did I miss anything else? @fnordcircle what are the odds?
 
Rappaport works for the league. No CBA. Gronk is contracted to a team, under the CBA. The league can control their employees, not so much players covered by the CBA.
Totally agree that there is a clear difference. I do think that if this was some sort of “embarrassment to the brand” issue for the league, there is language in the CBA that could have been used to go after a player. But I don’t think that’s the motivation here.
 
Mike Florio suggests:
Logic suggests that there was an issue with Rapoport doing a deal directly with Manscaped without receiving all appropriate clearances and permissions from the league.
That would explain NFL's strong reaction, they want their "cut"!

God, I hope we're not heading towards a world where popular Twitter posters start posting ads.

Florio concludes with:
While he may have violated business rules relating to when and how on-air talent can cut their own deals, it seems that there could be a remedy short of whacking him for two weeks.
I see what he did there!
 
Does Manscaped Inc. have a ladies version?

MuffBeGone ?

An Irish lady's version?

McMuffBeGone?

OT: I might need an intervention
 
I thought we were clamping down on politics in here, but this thread is currently being dominated by the same ******** from the same people as always.

This, only double!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft #5 and Thoughts About Dugger Signing
Matthew Slater Set For New Role With Patriots
Back
Top