- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 35,695
- Reaction score
- 7,798
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I would be overjoyed to never see Cam in a Pats jersey.
The players will be wise to work out a compromise instead of taking a hard line. There may be some sort of base salary distributed, but I just don't see serious cash given to the players if there are no games.
Suggesting the first third of 2018 is the reason I should get excited is not that reassuring.
That it was 1.5 years ago : a lifetime in NFL standards. And, will he be able to recapture ?He was playing at a MVP level. What is it exactly that felt off to you ?
Maybe it means nothing if Cam is released before September after not being able to beat out Stidham.
While I’m hoping this plan works out, I’m far less excited about Cam’s potential than most posters. Suggesting the first third of 2018 is the reason I should get excited is not that reassuring.
are you suggesting Brady is in better physical shape then Specimen Cam?That it was 1.5 years ago : a lifetime in NFL standards. And, will he be able to recapture ?
Brady dominating after a major injury in his 30s was incredible. I’m not sure it’s every player’s destiny to follow his unique path.
I’m only suggesting that what Brady did from 2009-2019 is rare and exceptional. It would be foolish to assume that it is the norm.are you suggesting Brady is in better physical shape then Specimen Cam?
We disagree. I think BB decided, after the Brady - Bledsoe that he’s going to go with the player that gives him the best chance to win, regardless of contract and tenure. It has served him (and fans) well for two decades.If cam is healthy he will beat out stidham even if stidham performs well. I think bill might want to go with experience this season if the season plays out.
We disagree. I think BB decided, after the Brady - Bledsoe that he’s going to go with the player that gives him the best chance to win, regardless of contract and tenure. It has served him (and fans) well for two decades.
Let's assume the season gets cancelled (which I don't think it will , but speaking hypothetically) and each side takes a 100% hardline stance and the players refuse to surrender a single penny. There's 2 problems:
And this is just about putting 35% of the money in escrow with the amount being paid out to the players at some point down the line. Now imagine thinking the NFLPA wouldn't fight the league if they tried to not pay or substantially adjust payment in case the season gets cancelled.
Everyone always takes a "hardline" stance in labor negotiations right up until the moment they compromise. If I were the Players, I wouldn't give up a single penny without getting something in return, but that doesn't mean it won't be worth their while to make a deal of some sort.The NFLPA will definitely take a hardline and that is the right approach. They obviously are absolutely fine with borrowing against the future and a flat cap instead of reducing anyones guarantees.
That it was 1.5 years ago : a lifetime in NFL standards. And, will he be able to recapture ?
1) They might not get their 2020 money anyway. If the teams don't pay the players, and the players sue, there's no guarantee they would win.
2) Honest question: If everyone is taking a hardline stance, what the heck happens to the 2021 salary cap if 2020 is cancelled? What is it going to be? A couple million dollars per team?
There's talk of a $30 million to $80 million drop in the salary cap next year under the current formulas if 2020 is played without fans. I can't even imagine the drop if there's no season at all.
Well, yes, I meant actual salaries and not bonuses.Unless the NFL folds entirely it is pretty clear that the players would win any litigation in accordance to the language in their contracts. Signing bonus installments must be paid out similarly roster bonuses and whatnot as well. Situations like this are exactly what contracts are for.
Now, guaranteed base salary might be a different story because it is paid per game week. Maybe there is enough wiggle room in the language to have it prorated to the actual amount of weeks played. No idea but that's certainly possible.
But wait a second. We're assuming in our little discussion that each side is taking a hardline stance. You said "The NFLPA will definitely take a hardline and that is the right approach." My response is that if the players take a hardline stance, then so will the owners. There's no mechanism in place to mandate (or even allow for) borrowing against future years so if the owners are taking a hardline stance in 2021, well... that would be where the players get screwed if they take a hardline stance today.Teams will borrow a nice chunk of money from the next 5-7 league years. Unless the status quo goes on for another 2 years this shouldn't be an issue. Yes, it would mean pretty flat caps over that period but one cancelled year wouldn't be an absolute disaster.
I assume you want me to say « a healthy Cam ». I’m open to either being the best option as I have no idea what either brings at this point...Well you tell me who gives them a best chance to win. A healthy cam or stidham?