PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

How lame is the NFLPA? Well, this might just say it all


Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, I've wondered why the low end of the wage scale doesn't get doubled or tripled, given thats' where most of the votes are.

If I get too political with this, I apologize. But, this is just like our national political situation. The 2/3rds of the nation that lives day to day and paycheck to paycheck doesn’t have any contact with leadership and is afraid to speak up over fear of retribution, so the government pursues the agenda of the 1/3rd that does have contact and no fear of speaking out.

Watch who stands to gain from this new CBA, it will not be the fringe player just trying to hang on long enough to improve their family’s future or good, contributing player on their rookie contract as it should, it will be established players who will see the gains as they add millions onto the millions they already have.
 
If I get too political with this, I apologize. But, this is just like our national political situation. The 2/3rds of the nation that lives day to day and paycheck to paycheck doesn’t have any contact with leadership and is afraid to speak up over fear of retribution, so the government pursues the agenda of the 1/3rd that does have contact and no fear of speaking out.

Watch who stands to gain from this new CBA, it will not be the fringe player just trying to hang on long enough to improve their family’s future or good, contributing player on their rookie contract as it should, it will be established players who will see the gains as they add millions onto the millions they already have.

From what I'm reading, the average 2018 NFL salary was $2.7M, and the median $860,000. I would think these would be the most telling metrics in determining how the contract is structured to support the top earners vs. majority of players.

What's the political process for contract and leadership decisions? Are player votes anonymous?

(As to your data above, I agree in general although there are huge differences in the economic well being of that 1/3 of the population you mention. Being at the bottom of that 1/3, and living in any coastal urban area - where much of the US population lives - is not a formula for financial security or political power.)
 
I'm dubious that such a thing as a hardliner for the NFLPA exists, simply because the players are too class-divided to be able to successfully maintain any sort of effective work action.

I think that's true to a great extent and is why they've always elected these guys who are basically just the commissioner's cronies whose main interest is increasing the cap.
 
As I think about it further, their is some logic to this policy beyond just paying lip service to marijuana’s standing status as an illegal drug by the Federal government, and I applaud the NFLPA if this is part of the reason for there still being testing and sanctions for marijuana use.

Although most users and the general public see marijuana as a harmless drug, it really isn’t. Like alcohol, it is addictive and heavy long term usage can be debilitating.

Having a policy in place where players only have to abstain from use for a few weeks to get it out of their system and have their test will help the Union find players who might have an addiction problem and cannot lay off the stuff for such a short period of time.

The proof will be in the details of the policy but if it’s meant to help players who might have an addiction problem get counseling and treatment then kudos to the Union.

I think it's more likely that the owners love this bullcrap because they're a bunch of weird law-and-order dudes with 50s morality and the negotiating capital necessary to go to from 2 weeks to nothing just isn't worth it, and it's likely not a priority or issue for the vast majority of players.
 
I had a really important point to make about this, man, but I can't remember what it was.
 
Although most users and the general public see marijuana as a harmless drug, it really isn’t. Like alcohol, it is addictive and heavy long term usage can be debilitating.

I've been consuming it for 25 years now... What about me has become debilitating?
 
As I think about it further, their is some logic to this policy beyond just paying lip service to marijuana’s standing status as an illegal drug by the Federal government, and I applaud the NFLPA if this is part of the reason for there still being testing and sanctions for marijuana use.

Although most users and the general public see marijuana as a harmless drug, it really isn’t. Like alcohol, it is addictive and heavy long term usage can be debilitating.

Having a policy in place where players only have to abstain from use for a few weeks to get it out of their system and have their test will help the Union find players who might have an addiction problem and cannot lay off the stuff for such a short period of time.

The proof will be in the details of the policy but if it’s meant to help players who might have an addiction problem get counseling and treatment then kudos to the Union.

By that reasoning the NFL should also be testing and penalizing for alcohol use.
 
The current union leadership is ultra-conservative and is rushing to get a new CBA done to line their pockets before upcoming union elections because there's a real chance (for the first time) they throw out Smith and his cronies and vote in hardliners who would demand heavy concessions and threaten a strike. Ownership knows this and the two sides are basically collaborating to screw over the players while they still have the chance. It's gross.

That said, as concessions go, some token telegraphed marijuana testing is pretty minor. If you get caught under those parameters, you deserve what's coming to you. (See Biden, Hunter and drug testing in the Reserves.)
The irony is that a high as a kite player base would probably be too mellow to strike. But the league needs to act tough, so here we are with the players and owners growing further apart.
 
I don't want to hear any crying from the players after they allow themselves to get bent over again. they have no balls.
It's tough for the players to get into the strike mentality. Lots of them don't come from money and, as new money, spend beyond their means. There is much evidence that the players struggle to rein in spending when it would be in their interests. Just look at all the bankruptcies for former players unable to regulate their major purchases and risky investments as their earnings shrink.

To strike requires saving in advance and being able to dip into the savings while striking to ensure better future earnings and safety. Players don't seem to have that ability overall and the union leadership would get booed off the stage -- and voted out -- for suggesting everyone tighten their belts for an on-coming strike. The players want to appear tough without having to follow through on any threats to ownership.

The league, filled with owners with more gold than Scrooge McDuck can outlast all of the players. They know any threats from the union is just blowing smoke because the players would rather have good earnings across time than sacrificing anything in the short-term for even more impressive long-term earnings.

It is a sad day for working class Americans when even millionaire players can't stand up against the billionaires. But that's just America these days.
 
It's tough for the players to get into the strike mentality. Lots of them don't come from money and, as new money, spend beyond their means. There is much evidence that the players struggle to rein in spending when it would be in their interests. Just look at all the bankruptcies for former players unable to regulate their major purchases and risky investments as their earnings shrink.

To strike requires saving in advance and being able to dip into the savings while striking to ensure better future earnings and safety. Players don't seem to have that ability overall and the union leadership would get booed off the stage -- and voted out -- for suggesting everyone tighten their belts for an on-coming strike. The players want to appear tough without having to follow through on any threats to ownership.

The league, filled with owners with more gold than Scrooge McDuck can outlast all of the players. They know any threats from the union is just blowing smoke because the players would rather have good earnings across time than sacrificing anything in the short-term for even more impressive long-term earnings.

It is a sad day for working class Americans when even millionaire players can't stand up against the billionaires. But that's just America these days.
To quote Patrick Ewing: “Yeah we make a lot of money, but we spend a lot of money too.”

The sad fact of the matter is the majority of the players have no clue about money management. They are making 7-figure salaries but still borrowing and living paycheck to paycheck.
 
It's tough for the players to get into the strike mentality. Lots of them don't come from money and, as new money, spend beyond their means. There is much evidence that the players struggle to rein in spending when it would be in their interests. Just look at all the bankruptcies for former players unable to regulate their major purchases and risky investments as their earnings shrink.

To strike requires saving in advance and being able to dip into the savings while striking to ensure better future earnings and safety. Players don't seem to have that ability overall and the union leadership would get booed off the stage -- and voted out -- for suggesting everyone tighten their belts for an on-coming strike. The players want to appear tough without having to follow through on any threats to ownership.

The league, filled with owners with more gold than Scrooge McDuck can outlast all of the players. They know any threats from the union is just blowing smoke because the players would rather have good earnings across time than sacrificing anything in the short-term for even more impressive long-term earnings.

It is a sad day for working class Americans when even millionaire players can't stand up against the billionaires. But that's just America these days.

The bigger issue to the kind of militancy that would be required to strike is the massive class divide within the union itself. Star players by and large have benefited from the deals the NFLPA has negotiated. It's the little guys and the old retirees who have gotten screwed.
 
New CBA would shrink annual marijuana testing window to two weeks


That's right. Even with the league trying to get a 17 game schedule, the incompetents running the NFLPA can't get rid of testing for weed.

"In exchange for more opportunities to ruin your career via injury and more billions for us, we'll merely lighten up our despotic regime's drug policy by making you piss in a cup for only a two week window. Kiss the rings, cause, ya know, we make 'em."

This is why it sucks. Beyond the fact that it's a ********, half-way concession (must've taken cues from current liberal establishment), the owners are getting an insane return on their "win" for more games.
 
I had a really important point to make about this, man, but I can't remember what it was.

Maybe try smoking less weed and you could remember:D

yes I got your scarcasm
 
The current union leadership is ultra-conservative and is rushing to get a new CBA done to line their pockets before upcoming union elections because there's a real chance (for the first time) they throw out Smith and his cronies and vote in hardliners who would demand heavy concessions and threaten a strike. Ownership knows this and the two sides are basically collaborating to screw over the players while they still have the chance. It's gross.

That said, as concessions go, some token telegraphed marijuana testing is pretty minor. If you get caught under those parameters, you deserve what's coming to you. (See Biden, Hunter and drug testing in the Reserves.)

It may be gross...but no work stoppage is good for the fans and especially the Tom Brady era. It would be a shame to have a work stoppage that takes away a few games of Brady's remaining career....as it stands, ASSUMING he's a Patriot for the rest of his career...we are looking at 60 games remaining MAX, IMO....
 
It may be gross...but no work stoppage is good for the fans and especially the Tom Brady era. It would be a shame to have a work stoppage that takes away a few games of Brady's remaining career....as it stands, ASSUMING he's a Patriot for the rest of his career...we are looking at 60 games remaining MAX, IMO....

Yeah, it would suck if a strike derailed Brady's first season in Las Vegas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/19: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Back
Top