- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 3,098
- Reaction score
- 4,648
FYI, the time code doesn't work (NFL's fault, not yours). It's the one at 6:41.
Thanks much!
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.FYI, the time code doesn't work (NFL's fault, not yours). It's the one at 6:41.
Lol it's ok you didn't hurt my feelings, it's true I didn't really care about football til 2006 so a lot of the first dynasty magic is lost on me. I think the first game I watched as a pats fan was the 2005 wildcard against Jacksonville. I jumped on the bandwagon just a little lateI was just kidding by the way. Twenty years of excellence makes it nearly impossible to pick which of anything is top five. So many great plays.
Holmes was out of boundssort of like the Santonio Holmes catch in the Super Bowl.
I was watching that game at TGIF with my brother who had just moved back to Maine. Ben Coates was a beast in that game.
Huge play, huge game, huge win in '03.Brady to Troy to beat the Dolphins in OT.
Coates was a beast.I'm a 2010 generation Pats fan, so the era of Coates is relatively unknown to me. I decided to watch some of his highlights the other day and I was astonished as to how big that dude was.
He's even billed to be smaller than Gronk (6'5 245lb vs. 6'6 260 or something), but he looked to be much larger than others on the field. It seems like the padding back then was far more bulky, so that might be it. I dunno. He just seemed big lol.
I'm a 2010 generation Pats fan, so the era of Coates is relatively unknown to me. I decided to watch some of his highlights the other day and I was astonished as to how big that dude was.
He's even billed to be smaller than Gronk (6'5 245lb vs. 6'6 260 or something), but he looked to be much larger than others on the field. It seems like the padding back then was far more bulky, so that might be it. I dunno. He just seemed big lol.