- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 30,762
- Reaction score
- 37,995
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Two interceptions is an impact. Sorry
The 49ers D Coordinator lost it....play of the game was that 3rd and 19 and for some dumb @$$ reason decided to call zone....Hill found a nice spot for a 1st down and stole the momentum in the process. A punt by KC there and game is over.Kyle shanahan lost this game.
Jimmy is good but I don’t doubt the reports that some in the Niners organization think Mullens is as good if not better.
If that’s the case then those people are the idiots. Brady was midway through an MVP season en route to a Super Bowl appearance, followed up by a Super Bowl win the following year. To argue they should’ve given that up for the unknown is preposterous. I love Jimmy and think he may end up with a ring but I don’t think his career ever amounts to anything in the same stratosphere as Brady.You're shifting the goal posts.
I've never said anything negative about JG. I've only stated that keeping Brady over JG was the correct decision. And I was right. The Garoppolites were wrong. Plain and simple.
One interception
No one counts brady int to the colts to end the 06 afc championship game
And frankly, the int last year on the one yard line against the cheifs when we coulda went up 14 to 0 was way worse than either of his today.
I know you arent holding that last int with the game basically out of reach and having to force down throws against him. Because that wouldnt indicate someone who doesnt have an agenda or anything.
Exactly what I stated.
Jimmy was handed a super bowl caliber team and choked the victory away.
Garoppolite nation has been telling me for over two years how trading JG was a mistake and now we know that it wasn't.
I am. Because every throw Brady made in 51 mattered just as much. One won a championship and the other lost. Plain and simple.
If that’s the case then those people are the idiots. Brady was midway through an MVP season en route to a Super Bowl appearance, followed up by a Super Bowl win the following year. To argue they should’ve given that up for the unknown is preposterous. I love Jimmy and think he may end up with a ring but I don’t think his career ever amounts to anything in the same stratosphere as Brady.
Brady lost 2 and Jimmy lost 1.
I mean I chose Brady every ****ing time too but it's insane to pin that loss on jimmy
Try the coaching and the officiating first.
The 49ers D Coordinator lost it....play of the game was that 3rd and 19 and for some dumb @$$ reason decided to call zone....Hill found a nice spot for a 1st down and stole the momentum in the process. A punt by KC there and game is over.
I pin it on a closed eyed Jimmy tossing up interceptions.
Brady lost 2 and Jimmy lost 1.
I mean I chose Brady every ****ing time too but it's insane to pin that loss on jimmy
Try the coaching and the officiating first.
Was keeping Brady the right decision? That's the question.
Mahomes also is a better player.First one yes
Second one just meh.
Kermit int way worse
I didn't watch any of the game, so maybe you can help me. Which coach or official threw the two SF interceptions?
I didn't watch any of the game, so maybe you can help me. Which coach or official threw the two SF interceptions?
Mahomes also is a better player.
Brady lost 2 and Jimmy lost 1.
I mean I chose Brady every ****ing time too but it's insane to pin that loss on jimmy
Try the coaching and the officiating first.
Let's start with if you think bradys last int against the colts in 06 afc title game had any impact on the game before I engage.