- Joined
- Sep 8, 2008
- Messages
- 3,876
- Reaction score
- 4,465
Might want to take your own advice there.
No one with a working prefrontal cortex agrees with this nonsense. Brady is not making Patrick Freaking Mahomes look mediocre. One of Mahomes' greatest strengths is his mobility, which allows him to make a majority of the plays that he does. It's not always about personnel; how you use the guys you have is more important.
Let's be clear-- Brady's numbers took an absolute nosedive when we lost guys on offense, no doubt about it. But that also had a lot to do with the line not giving him time-- THIS IS PRECISELY WHAT MAHOMES THRIVES AT. The Chiefs' line is nothing to write home about and they have Patrick under duress a lot, but the kicker is that he's athletic and can escape long enough for his Usain Bolt-like receivers to get open. Brady would throw the ball in the dirt.
You're trying to compare a QB with a team that relies on its defense to one that is all offense, and state that the QB with the better defense would thrive in the offensive scheme-- it's like you've never watched football a day in your life. Football is more than players-- it's scheme. It's coaching. It's strategy. Brady could have been more successful in KC than he was with the Patriots, but making Patrick Mahomes look mediocre is a Stretch Armstrong level reach. You simply don't know what you are talking about.
You seem like you have a mediocre level of football IQ