- Joined
- Sep 16, 2004
- Messages
- 12,409
- Reaction score
- 13,117
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.His numbers, albeit from 2016, are not half bad.
Blount and Hogan were also really good in 2016. Want them back? They also have the advantage of not sitting around letting their body atrophy.
That's what the workout is for...to determine if he's still in shape.
The workout is a publicity stunt. Teams could have worked him out privately to determine if he's still in shape.
In any event, if you acknowledge that whether or not he's in shape is an unknown I can't see how you can confidently assert he'd be a better option than Stidham.
I’m not convinced you do think. This thread seems to not be about thinking rather it’s about tossing **** around like it’s laser tag or paintball only it’s **** instead of a laser gun or ****ball instead of a paintball.If the Pats want to know how to beat the Ravens, they’d sign him. If they meet again, I’d think the Pats lose.
Obviously I'm making the assumption that if the Pats sign him he's in decent football shape by their own determination.
He's a veteran QB who has been to the Super Bowl.
Good sportsmanship from Tom Brady.Brady is happy that he's getting a chance.
Except you'd already decided he's a better option than Stidham before the workout.
There are lots of those. That doesn't mean they are in playing condition in 2019.
As far as backup QBs, who else is available now? The other option besides Kap, if Bill is not comfortable with Stidham, is Sam Bradford.
I think if BB thought he needed a better option than Stidham, he would have brought someone in other than Wednesday practice Brady placeholder Kessler.I've seen nothing from Stidham that gives me confidence in him.
That's not to say he is not ready ... we haven't really seen him.
I thought it was better to keep him than Hoyer - who I knew was useless.
If Kaep is a much better option than Stidham I say sign him.
I don't much care for him personally - but business is business and ours is Lombardis.
Stidham easily could suffer turf toe as the ink is drying on the contract.
Like him or hate him ... he deserves a chance like anyone else.