NYCPATS4LIFE
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
- Messages
- 4,877
- Reaction score
- 3,475
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Rosenhaus’ entire purpose in this thing is to make money. That’s it. He couldn’t care less about anything his client does or say, all he cares about is spinning it into a positive so he can get signed and he can get commission.
Zero. Any relief will come next year.So what’s the deal here? What’s the most cap relief we can get for this year if his contract is voided . I’m sure there will be some dead money.
Nope. He was cut before he criticized Kraft, so he was not under contract when he criticized Kraft, so that criticism of Kraft can’t be used by NE.
If it was in question before, it's not now. And that bonus wasn't due until tomorrow. I'm shocked.
Since Rosenhaus wants his client to make money so he can make money I’m sure he’s just thrilled, thrilled that his client is giving the NFL even more reasons to suspend him and giving teams even more reasons to have 2nd thoughts about signing him.
Essentially he just voided his contract, as he was critical of Kraft.
He’s a dumbass.
What exactly does he mean by: "System working effectively"? Is he suggesting it's a good thing that the writer is getting death threats?
View attachment 24347
Yeah that’s my thought process too. They can’t use the tirade as the reason for termination but I don’t know why it can’t be used as the reason to not pay the signing bonus.But the criticism was made before the bonus was due meaning it could be easily argued the club's obligation to that bonus under it's terms has in fact been voided
I'm only commenting on which approach gives the Patriots the best chance to win the battle to not pay the guarantee.
The actions are accusations. There was no criminal charge. The league didn't even feel as though up to Wednesday that Brown deserved to be on the exempt list, let alone suspended. For this reason opening the door for AB's team to say the lawsuit/incident added to the decision to cut him, and not pay guarantees, weakened the Patriots position.
The texts clearly violated the agreement after AB was a member of the team.
Playing him last Sunday places the violation cleanly on the better argument.
Since Rosenhaus wants his client to make money so he can make money I’m sure he’s just thrilled, thrilled that his client is giving the NFL even more reasons to suspend him and giving teams even more reasons to have 2nd thoughts about signing him.
Someone get the man some help before he wins up dead. This is abnormal behavior
Does he realize that by bringing up Sharpe and big ben hes almost admitting he did sexually assault her but since they played he should?