Antonio Brown

sambam94 said:

someone who has work done and doesn't pay is a scum bag...

Click to expand...

Unless the work was shoddy or the vendor did not fulfill their contractural obligations.

QuantumMechanic said:

Probably bad. If it lasted 10 hours she probably had lots of stuff to tell/show to the NFL investigators.

Click to expand...

TommyBrady12 said:

Bad

Click to expand...

You have zero clue what it actually means. First it's laughable to think it actually lasted 10 hours. 0.0% chance it was just 10 hours of her giving testimony.. The fact that this was leaked to CNN and not some NFL media says it likely doesn't come from the league office and was probably leaked by her attorney(s) or as posted above it's coming from a Broncos fan no-name at CNN and not some higher on the food chain? so it's questionable at best. She tweeted it at 9:50AM ET. No one had said anything until Dale Arnold retweeted it at 1PM. So it was out there for 3 hours and no one picked up on it.

She also could have given them nothing more than what's in her lawsuit. We have no clue of knowing that.

Also missed in you guys jumping to "IT'S BAD" concern trolling is the flipside Brown could have stuff that kills whatever she gave.

So when do we get the next AB scandal? Think he’ll do something else before Sunday?

blackglass3 said:

Don't know if this is good or bad:

@anacabrera: meeting with Antonio Brown's accuser lasted 10 hours, a source close to the case tells CNN.

Click to expand...

If there's anything in this thread that we can trust, it's CNN.

What is BB waiting for? Release AB STAT

Froob said:

So when do we get the next AB scandal? Think he’ll do something else before Sunday?

Click to expand...

Heard AB didn't address somebody by their preferred pronouns. Ana Cabrera is all over it. More at 11

JMC00 said:

You have zero clue what it actually means. First it's laughable to think it actually lasted 10 hours. 0.0% chance it was just 10 hours of her giving testimony.. The fact that this was leaked to CNN and not some NFL media says it likely doesn't come from the league office and was probably leaked by her attorney(s) or as posted above it's coming from a Broncos fan no-name at CNN and not some higher on the food chain? so it's questionable at best. She tweeted it at 9:50AM ET. No one had said anything until Dale Arnold retweeted it at 1PM. So it was out there for 3 hours and no one picked up on it.

She also could have given them nothing more than what's in her lawsuit. We have no clue of knowing that.

Also missed in you guys jumping to "IT'S BAD" concern trolling is the flipside Brown could have stuff that kills whatever she gave.

Click to expand...

No one is assuming the report is correct. However, if it was in fact 10 hours, it's bad. Depositions typically don't even last that long. That's like 2 days of Kavanaugh testimony...

TommyBrady12 said:

No one is assuming the report is correct. However, if it was in fact 10 hours, it's bad. Depositions typically don't even last that long. That's like 2 days of Kavanaugh testimony...

Click to expand...

10 hours is good news for AB.

Fatmancryin said:

Yeah they both deleted all of their social media accounts.

Weird for her at least as she is supposedly trying to build a business.

Click to expand...

Any attorney he had would have had all these downloaded long ago since they were in negotiations

This woman claimed she was thrown on the mattress and raped against her will on may 20th 2018. Brown’s reps released videos claiming they where recent videos of them together after may 20th. Shouldn’t the nfl be interested in attaining those videos and not just the evidence from accuser. If those videos are after may 20th case closed!!!!!!

NYCPATS4LIFE said:

This woman claimed she was thrown on the mattress and raped against her will on may 20th 2018. Brown’s reps released videos claiming they where recent videos of them together after may 20th. Shouldn’t the nfl be interested in attaining those videos and not just the evidence from accuser. If those videos are after may 20th case closed!!!!!!

Click to expand...

What do you think the answer to that question is?

robertweathers said:

What do you think the answer to that question is?

Click to expand...

He could be holding on to them until she shows what she got for the nfl. Like a counter-attack.

TommyBrady12 said:

No one is assuming the report is correct. However, if it was in fact 10 hours, it's bad. Depositions typically don't even last that long. That's like 2 days of Kavanaugh testimony...

Click to expand...

And he is now sitting on the highest court

6 games is maximum brown should be facing given what the precedent is but then again theres none for civil cases.

Hill had a criminal investigation and still faced 0 game suspension

NYCPATS4LIFE said:

This woman claimed she was thrown on the mattress and raped against her will on may 20th 2018. Brown’s reps released videos claiming they where recent videos of them together after may 20th. Shouldn’t the nfl be interested in attaining those videos and not just the evidence from accuser. If those videos are after may 20th case closed!!!!!!

Click to expand...

A civil case like this can morph into a criminal case. Brown would be smart to avoid any interviews or evidence requests on the part of the NFL.

SBLIII said:

10 hours is good news for AB.

Click to expand...

No, if the woman were clearly making it up, they would have wrapped it up much quicker than that.

festy1986 said:

And he is now sitting on the highest court

6 games is maximum brown should be facing given what the precedent is but then again theres none for civil cases.

Hill had a criminal investigation and still faced 0 game suspension

Click to expand...

If he proves this woman’s inconsistencies he should get none! If the girlfriend beater didn’t get suspended why should he?

Deus Irae said:

A civil case like this can morph into a criminal case. Brown would be smart to avoid any interviews or evidence requests on the part of the NFL.

Click to expand...

Yes but nobody is gonna believe someone who got raped and then is smiling the next couple of months with her rapist. Seriously?

NYCPATS4LIFE said:

He could be holding on to them until she shows what she got for the nfl. Like a counter-attack.

Click to expand...

Thats 1 & 3

1) They haven't met w AB yet but it'll be interesting how rigorous of a defense he puts up w/ the NFL when he has a trial pending.
2) He has not been threatened to be put on the Commish List - yet
3) He is not in civil suit litigation and not disclosed in pre-trial discovery. I'd venture to say AB would rather be suspended a couple of games than fork over $1m in the civil suit.
4) The NFL wants to railroad AB b/c of the "crime" and it fits the Susan G Comen pink October narrative nicely.

TommyBrady12 said:

No, if the woman were clearly making it up, they would have wrapped it up much quicker than that.

Click to expand...

Or maybe they wanted to get the facts straight. If it was cut and dry should would have been out sooner.

NYCPATS4LIFE said:

Yes but nobody is gonna believe someone who got raped and then is smiling the next couple of months with her rapist. Seriously?

Click to expand...

I'm going to bring up a famous example. It's not to be political, but to show how even the most dubious "evidence" can lead to entrenched positions, particularly on charged issues like this one:

Think Ford/Kavanaugh