patman12
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2006
- Messages
- 1,968
- Reaction score
- 2,243
It’s premature.Came too soon?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It’s premature.Came too soon?
Would be nice if a Patsfans poster (Joker perhaps) filed a civil suit against Goodell, and he was forced to put himself on the exempt list.
They where in a consensual relationship something brown has always stated. She has said it was professional. When he said i busted your back it could have been after sex.
I understand, but taunting someone about a sexual activity doesn’t make you guilty of rape or any other crime. Makes you childish but not guilty of a crime.
BTW - - happy birthday, Dude!
What was the timing of the "taunting"? I can see him doing that if it happened after her law suit was filed. It's not a huge stretch to imagine her thinking it no big deal at the time. Maybe they did "playful" sex things like that to each other. Maybe he just thought it would be funny. Maybe she laughed about it, maybe she was annoyed about it. Maybe she merely tolerated it. If that's the case then I can see how Brown might taunt her about it now that she's filed a law suit against him. On the other hand if she hated it. If she hated him for doing it and he knew that then he is an ahole for taunting her about it now. I just think anyone who has dug in about "knowing" what happened should rethink their position. It's all speculation right
Got a link to that letter?
We have seen the vids showing her to be a liar, so I would need to see a copy of this letter.
(Edit: Sorry, as you can see I have never had the talent for conciseness.)
The first reference in the texts to jacking on her back doesn't make sense as a taunt. Both texts are about how angry he is that she's trying to extort him, angrily talking about how she and her mom should pick an easier mark next time, and so on.
The first part of the text to me read like, "We were intimate, we did all these things, I can't believe you're extorting me." For example, an analogous text might read, "We walked along the river holding hands! We had romantic dinners by candlelight! We were sleeping together! How could you sleep with my best friend and say we were just friends?"
To read the first part as a taunt doesn't jive with the second sentence, "slept with u n bed!" AB is saying "we were really intimate. We slept together in bed. I jacked off on your back."
The reference to "jacking off on her back" could easily just mean they were doing doggy and he unloaded on her back at the end instead of inside her.
Now look at the second reference to jacking off on her back in the second text. me n (redacted) a laugh about this **** me busing on your back!" He calls it "this ****." Let's say he did jack off on her back, but only in the context of finishing after doggy style. So to AB, the fact she's making up some ridiculous story about him masturbating and finishing on her while watching a religious video sets him off. That's why he calls it "this ****" and the story's so stupid that he and his friend(s) are laughing about it.
Now to me that's an easily plausible explanation. Both stories are going to be unprovable.
Regardless, the original interpretation doesn't make sense to me, because he's clearly saying, "we slept together in bed, we were intimate, I can't believe you're coming up with this extortion garbage and texting my team, etc." Wouldn't follow logically to frame an argument, "(<TAUNT>) (<EVIDENCE OF INTIMACY>, <HOW COULD YOU DO THIS>"
haha I pulled the chair out from under you when you were sitting down! We were intimate in bed, so I can't believe you're pulling all this!"
Instead, to me he's clearly doing,
EXAMPLE OF INTIMACY (jacking off on her back after doggy)
EXAMPLE OF INTIMACY (we slept together in bed)
then following with, "WE WERE REALLY INTIMATE, HOW CAN YOU BE TREATING ME LIKE THIS."
Yeah, Brady "lost" that because they concluded the CBA gave the commissioner basically unrestricted power to do anything regardless of the merit of the case.
Then why is he laughing and taunting her about it?
She actually said they had a "brother/sister" relationship.
Look, I don't find her story credible. I already stated that. I don't find his story credible either (that none of this is true).
This clown of a woman works for the Globe, but she's calling out the Patriots for how they're handling a woman's issue.
On Antonio Brown, the Patriot Way is about looking the other way - The Boston Globe
Ordway just raked her over the coals for her hypocrisy.
Of course not. It will be about how a pro athlete got away with rape, just like how Eli got away with fraud, and Payton got away with Sexual assault, and Ray Lewis got away with murder and Tyreek Hill got away with child abuse.If this gets exposed as a money grab, will she write a new article about that and warn us of the danger of false accusations from women and how the Patriots can be admired for not acting too hastily?